湖北农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (1): 239-245.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.01.042

• 经济·管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国碳密集型行业对美贸易的竞争性与互补性研究

李佳逸, 嵇颖婕, 符磊   

  1. 河海大学商学院,南京 211100
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-22 出版日期:2024-01-25 发布日期:2024-02-05
  • 作者简介:李佳逸(2000-),女,江苏南京人,在读本科生,研究方向为贸易经济,(电话)13851512821 (电子信箱)2772213367@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(20BJL063)

Study on the competitiveness and complementarity of China’s carbon-intensive industries’ trade with the US

LI Jia-yi, JI Ying-jie, FU Lei   

  1. Business School of Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
  • Received:2021-11-22 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-02-05

摘要: 在中国“碳达峰”“碳中和”重点任务和美国碳关税政策生效的背景下,基于UNCOMTRADE数据库、CEADs数据库和HS商品分类法,利用投入产出表对中国和美国的碳密集型行业加以识别,将碳密集型行业分为传统碳密集型行业和完全碳密集型行业。然后,采用多个指数的实证测度指标,从竞争性和互补性两个角度,对中美碳密集型行业的贸易情况进行系统性分析。结果表明,相较于美国传统碳密集型行业,中国传统碳密集型行业出口较少,两国竞争性与互补性均比较弱;对于完全碳密集型行业,中美两国均是碳密集型产品出口大国,两国贸易竞争性和互补性并存,且美国占用了中国的碳排放量,中国付出了更多的环境成本。

关键词: 投入产出表, 碳密集型行业, 竞争性, 互补性, 对美贸易

Abstract: Under the background of China’s “Carbon Peak” and “Carbon Neutrality” and the effective implementation of the United States’ carbon tax policy, based on the UNCOMTRADE database, CEADs database, and HS commodity classification, the input-output table to identify the carbon-intensive industries in China and the US was employed, categorizing them into traditional carbon-intensive industries and fully carbon-intensive industries. Then, the trade situation of carbon-intensive industries between China and the United States from the perspectives of competitiveness and complementarity was systematically analyzed by using empirical measurement indicators of multiple indexes. The results indicated that, compared to the traditional carbon-intensive industries in the United States, China’s traditional carbon-intensive industries had a lower level of exports, with both countries demonstrating relatively weak competitiveness and complementarity. Concerning fully carbon-intensive industries, both China and the United States were major exporters of carbon-intensive products, exhibiting concurrent trade competitiveness and complementarity. Additionally, the United States was utilizing China’s carbon emissions, leading to China incurring higher environmental costs.

Key words: input-output table, carbon-intensive industries, competitiveness, complementarity, trade with the US

中图分类号: