湖北农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (22): 51-55.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.22.011

• 资源·环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同钝化剂修复镉污染稻田及其对水稻吸收镉的影响

冯敬云1,2, 聂新星2, 刘波2, 李方敏1, 杨利2   

  1. 1.长江大学化学与环境工程学院,湖北 荆州 434023;
    2.湖北省农业科学院植保土肥研究所/农业农村部废弃物肥料化利用重点实验室/农业环境治理湖北省工程研究中心,武汉 430064
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-25 出版日期:2021-11-25 发布日期:2021-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 杨利,(电子信箱)516416134@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:冯敬云(1996-),女,贵州镇远人,硕士,主要从事土壤污染修复方面的研究,(电话)18163135701(电子信箱)1178271220@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0801003); 公益性协同创新联盟专项(2018LM); 湖北省政府采购项目(2020-05381)

Effects of different passivators on available cadmium contents in paddy soil and its accumulation in rice

FENG Jing-yun1,2, NIE Xin-xing2, LIU Bo2, LI Fang-min1, YANG Li2   

  1. 1. College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering,Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023,Hubei,China;
    2. Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer/Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hubei Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Environmental Control,Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Wuhan 430064,China
  • Received:2020-12-25 Online:2021-11-25 Published:2021-12-10

摘要: 以氧化钙镁(NL)、生物炭(B)和碳酸盐岩(SRC) 3种钝化剂在大冶市轻度(S1)、中度(S2)镉(Cd)污染农田土壤开展田间试验,研究不同钝化剂对土壤有效态Cd含量及对水稻子粒Cd吸收的影响。结果表明,3种钝化剂处理均显著降低水稻子粒Cd含量,与对照相比,试验点S1、S2水稻子粒Cd含量分别降低了42.88%~67.29%、38.25%~52.59%,其中试验点S2水稻子粒Cd含量达到了食品安全国家标准(GB2762—2017,Cd≤0.2 mg/kg)。NL、B、SRC处理能不同程度降低土壤有效态Cd含量,与对照相比,试验点S1、S2土壤有效态Cd含量分别降低了14.09%~17.51%、30.38%~37.60%、9.22%~10.54%。试验点S1、S2土壤有效态Cd含量与水稻子粒呈一定的正相关。施用3种钝化剂显著提高试验点S1的土壤pH,土壤pH与水稻子粒Cd含量呈显著负相关,相关系数(R2)达0.727 8。3种钝化处理下对水稻产量没有显著影响,且达到了NY/T3343—2018评价标准中重金属钝化剂施用后作物减产不超过10%的要求。3种钝化剂原位钝化修复中度、轻度Cd污染稻田土壤效果表现为生物炭>氧化钙镁>碳酸盐岩。

关键词: 重金属, 镉, 土壤修复, 钝化剂, 水稻

Abstract: Three passivators (calcium and magnesium oxide (NL), biochar (B) and carbonate rock (SRC) were used to pollute farmland soil with mild (S1) and moderate (S2) cadmium (Cd) in Daye city. Field experiments were carried out to discuss the effects of different passivators on available Cd contents in soil and Cd contents of rice grains. The results showed that all the three passivations significantly reduced the contents of Cd in rice grains. Compared with the control, the contents of Cd in rice grains in field test site S1 and S2 decreased by 42.88%~67.29% and 38.25%~52.59%, respectively, and the contents of Cd in rice grains in test site S2 even reached the national food safety standard (GB2762—2017 Cd≤0.2 mg/kg). The above three passivator treatments reduced the contents of soil available Cd in different degrees. Compared with the control group, the contents of soil available Cd in S1 and S2 were decreased by 14.09% to 17.51%, 30.38% to 37.60% and 9.22% to 10.54%, respectively. Soil available Cd contents in S1 and S2 were a certain extent correlated positively with rice grains. Soil pH of S1 was significantly increased by three passivators, and soil pH was significantly negatively correlated with Cd content in rice grain, with a negative correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.727 8. There was no significant effect of the three passivating agent treatments on rice yield, and the requirements that the crop yield reduction not exceed 10% after the application of heavy metal passivating agents in the evaluation standard of NY/T3343—2018 was reached. The effect of in-situ remediation of the three passivating agents in the mild and moderate Cd polluted paddy soil was as follow: Biocharcoal>calcium and magnesium oxide>carbonate rock.

Key words: heavy metal, cadmium, soil remediation, passivator, rice

中图分类号: