湖北农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (7): 213-220.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.07.040

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于改进AHP法的乡村居住环境适老性研究——以南昌市新建区乡村居住环境为例

陈佐江a, 唐世斌a, 覃盟琳a,b   

  1. 广西大学,a. 林学院; b. 土木建筑工程学院,南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-08 出版日期:2022-04-10 发布日期:2022-05-04
  • 通讯作者: 唐世斌(1963-),男,重庆梁平人,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事风景园林建筑工程与规划设计研究,(电子信箱)tshibin@163.com。
  • 作者简介:陈佐江(1994-),男,江西新建人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为风景园林规划设计,(电话)13707082849(电子信箱)895780170@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51768001)

Study on the suitability of rural residential environment for aging based on improved AHP method:Taking the rural living environment in Xinjian district of Nanchang as an example

CHEN Zuo-jianga, TANG Shi-bina, QIN Meng-lina,b   

  1. a. College of Forestry; b. School of Civil Engineering and Architectre, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
  • Received:2022-01-08 Online:2022-04-10 Published:2022-05-04

摘要: 为研究当前中国普通乡村居住环境的适老化建设情况,选取南昌市新建区9个乡镇的乡村居住环境作为研究对象,构建以1个目标层、6个准则层和36个指标层为基础的评价指标体系,并创新性使用改进AHP法进行权重计算。结果显示,9个调查乡镇的乡村居住环境适老性综合评价得分及排序为招贤镇(3.870 5分)>经开区(3.767 2分)>梅岭镇(3.661 8分)>溪霞镇(3.406 2分)>石岗镇(3.395 0分)>乐化镇(3.300 7分)>樵舍镇(3.168 2分)>石埠镇(2.975 4分)>西山镇(2.725 3分),南昌市新建区乡村居住环境适老性综合评价得分为3.363 4分,适老化建设评价满意度为“一般”。

关键词: 改进AHP法, 乡村居住环境, 适老性, POE法, 南昌市新建区

Abstract: In order to study the aging construction of ordinary rural living environment in China, the rural living environment of 9 towns in Xinjian district of Nanchang city was selected as the research object,the evaluation index system based on one target layer, six criteria layers and 36 index layers was constructed, and the improved AHP method was innovatively used to calculate the weight. The results show that the comprehensive evaluation scores and ranking of rural living environment suitability of 9 surveyed townships are Zhaoxian town (3.870 5 points) > Economic Development zone (3.767 2 points) > Meilin town (3.661 8 points) > Xixia town (3.406 2 points) > Shigang town (3.395 0 points) > Lehua town (3.300 7 points) > Qiaoshe town (3.168 2 points) > Shibu town (2.975 4 points) > Xishan town (2.725 3 points), and the comprehensive evaluation score of rural living environment suitability in Xinjian district of Nanchang city is 3.363 4 points. The evaluation satisfaction of aging construction is “general”.

Key words: improved AHP method, rural living environment, aging suitability, POE method, Xinjian district, Nanchang city

中图分类号: