活性炭对秸秆和猪粪混合厌氧发酵产生物甲烷的影响

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.11.008

湖北农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (11): 44-49.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.11.008

活性炭对秸秆和猪粪混合厌氧发酵产生物甲烷的影响

朱佳琪^1,2, 陈芳清¹, 黄永文², 熊丹伟¹, 刘杨赟²

1.三峡大学湖北省三峡地区生态保护与治理国际联合研究中心,湖北宜昌 443002;
2.湖北正江环保科技有限公司,湖北宜昌 443002

收稿日期:2021-04-29 出版日期:2022-06-10 发布日期:2022-07-06
通讯作者: 陈芳清（1963-）,男,教授,博士,主要从事水稻田生物甲烷生产利用及生态修复研究,（电子信箱）fqchen@ctgu.edu.cn。
作者简介:朱佳琪（1996-）,男,湖北黄石人,硕士,主要从事水稻田生物甲烷生产利用研究,（电话）13797786950（电子信箱）296015326@qq.com;
基金资助:
湖北省科技创新专项重点项目（2016AHB014）

Effect of activated carbon on methane production in the mixed anaerobic fermentation with straw and pig manure

ZHU Jia-qi^1,2, CHEN Fang-qing¹, HUANG Yong-wen², XIONG Dan-wei¹, LIU Yang-yun²

1. Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Center of Ecological Conservation and Management in Three Gorges Area, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China;
2. Hubei Zhengjiang Environmental Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Yichang 443002, Hubei,China;

Received:2021-04-29 Online:2022-06-10 Published:2022-07-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高水稻秸秆与猪粪田间混合厌氧发酵产生物甲烷的效率,研究在中温（35±1）℃下模拟田间厌氧发酵条件活性炭对厌氧发酵产生物甲烷的影响。试验分别设置了活性炭添加量为发酵基质质量的0%、1.0%、2.0%、3.0%、6.0%、8.0%等6个处理水平,测定了各处理的生物甲烷产气量和秸秆降解的变化。结果表明,活性炭的添加能加快秸秆和猪粪混合厌氧发酵进程,缩短停滞时间,提高产甲烷峰值;活性炭的添加对秸秆和猪粪混合厌氧发酵生物甲烷的产量有显著影响。随着活性炭添加量的增加,生物甲烷的累计产量呈先增加后减少的变化,以2%和3%活性炭添加量的生物甲烷的累计产量最高,分别比对照提高了29.29%和28.04%;活性炭的加入还有利于混合厌氧发酵系统水稻秸秆纤维素和半纤维素的降解。在活性炭添加量为3%的条件下,总木质纤维素降解率达到29.57%,纤维素和半纤维素降解率分别为45.35%和34.09%,分别比对照提高了125.73%、122.00% 和128.33%。表明适量活性炭的添加能加快水稻秸秆和猪粪混合厌氧发酵进程,提高厌氧发酵系统甲烷的产率和秸秆的降解率。

关键词: 混合厌氧发酵, 甲烷, 活性炭, 秸秆降解

Abstract: In order to improve the methane production efficiency of the mixed anaerobic fermentation with rice straw and pig manure in the field, this research carried out an experiment of activated carbon on methane production by simulating the field anaerobic fermentation conditions at medium temperature （35±1） ℃ in the laboratory. Six treatments were used whose activated carbon content account for 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 6%, 8% of fermentation substrate, respectively. The variation of gas production and straw degradation of each treatment was determined. The results showed that the activated carbon promoted the mixed anaerobic fermentation process by shortening lag time and increasing the peak value of methane production; the addition of activated carbon significantly influenced the biological methane production of the mixed anaerobic fermentation with straw and pig manure. The biological methane production increased firstly and then decreased with the increasing activated carbon amount, and reached the highest value at 2% and 3% treatments, increasing by 29.29% and 28.04% contrasting to the control, respectively; the addition of activated carbon also promoted the degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose of rice straw in the mixed anaerobic fermentation system. At the treatment of 3% activated carbon, the degradation rate of total lignocellulose, cellulose and hemicellulose reached 29.57%, 45.35% and 34.09%, respectively, increasing by 125.73%, 122.00% and 128.33% contrasting to the control. The results indicated that the addition of activated carbon can accelerate the process of mixed anaerobic fermentation with rice straw and pig manure, and increase the methane production and straw degradation in the anaerobic fermentation system.

Key words: mixed anaerobic fermentation, methane, activated carbon, straw degradation

中图分类号:

Q819

朱佳琪, 陈芳清, 黄永文, 熊丹伟, 刘杨赟. 活性炭对秸秆和猪粪混合厌氧发酵产生物甲烷的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(11): 44-49.

ZHU Jia-qi, CHEN Fang-qing, HUANG Yong-wen, XIONG Dan-wei, LIU Yang-yun. Effect of activated carbon on methane production in the mixed anaerobic fermentation with straw and pig manure[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(11): 44-49.

参考文献

[1] 白洁瑞,李轶冰,郭欧燕,等.不同温度条件粪秆结构配比及尿素、纤维素酶对沼气产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(2):188-193.
[2] 沈飞,李汉广,钟斌,等.碳氮比对稻草和猪粪生物处理及厌氧消化的影响[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(11):4212-4219.
[3] LIU E, LIU S.Process optimization and study of biogas fermentation with a mixture of duck manure and straw[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews,2017,72(16):439-444.
[4] HE R,SHEN D S,WANG J Q,et al.Biological degradation of MSW in a methanogenic reactor using treated leachate recirculation[J]. Process biochemistry,2005,40(12):3660-3666.
[5] 李伟,吴树彪,HAMIDOU B,等.沼气工程高效稳定运行技术现状及展望[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(7):187-196,202.
[6] CHIAKI H, TATSUGA H, HIROTO T.GET system-Establishment of renewable energy bio-methane, production system from rice straw in fallow paddy field[J].Bioindustry,2012,29(12):13-22.
[7] 陈芳清,耿启明,张行,等. 利用水稻秸秆与农家肥田间混合发酵产生物甲烷的方法[P]. 中国专利:CN110684808A,2020-01-14.
[8] 张仙梅,云斯宁,杜玉凤,等.沼气厌氧发酵生物催化剂研究进展与展望[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(5):141-155.
[9] LI Y, CHEN Y G, WU J.Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review[J]. Applied energy,2019,240:120-137.
[10] BARUA S, ZAKARIA B S, RANJAN B.Enhanced methanogenic co-degradation of propionate and butyrate by anaerobic microbiome enriched on conductive carbon fibers[J]. Bioresource technology,2018,266:259-266.
[11] CHEN S,ROTARU A E,SHRESTHA PR M,et al.Promoting interspecies electron transfer with biochar.[J]. Scientific reports,2014,4(1):1-7.
[12] JING Y, WAN J, ANGELIDAKI I,et al.iTRAQ quantitative proteomic analysis reveals the pathways for methanation of propionate facilitated by magnetite[J]. Water research,2017,108:212-221.
[13] SOUICHIRO K,KAZUHITO H,KAZUYA W.Methanogenesis facilitated by electric syntrophy via (semi)conductive iron‐oxide minerals[J]. Environmental microbiology,2012,14(7):1646-1654.
[14] LIU F, ROTARU A E, SHRESTHA P M,et al.Magnetite compensates for the lack of a pilinassociated ctype cytochrome in extracellular electron exchange[J]. Environmental microbiology,2015, 17(3):648-655.
[15] 熊素敏,左秀凤,朱永义.稻壳中纤维素、半纤维素和木质素的测定[J].粮食与饲料工业,2005(8):40-41.
[16] 樊丽. 锰和铁对牛粪厌氧发酵的影响研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2012.
[17] 李雪,张欣,葛长明,等.不同秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气潜力研究[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(6):496-499.
[18] 靳红梅,杜静,郭瑞华,等.沼渣水热炭添加对猪粪中温厌氧消化的促进作用[J].中国沼气,2018,36(1):47-53.
[19] 石思慧,郭荣欣,张良,等.添加铁氧化物和活性炭对玉米秸秆两相厌氧消化性能和微生物学特性影响研究[J].北京化工大学学报(自然科学版),2020,47(5):89-96.
[20] 韩秋平. 活性炭在水处理中的应用方法研究与进展[J].中国高新区,2017(15):159.
[21] ROMERO R M,VALENZUELA E I,CERVANTES F J,et al.Improved methane production from anaerobic digestion of liquid and raw fractions of swine manure effluent using activated carbon[J]. Journal of water process engineering,2020,38:101576.
[22] 马佳莹,魏华炜,苏应龙,等.微生物代谢视角下粉末活性炭通过缓解酸化提高城市有机固废厌氧共消化甲烷生产力[J].环境卫生工程,2020,28(6):94.
[23] 赵智强,李杨,张耀斌.厌氧消化中直接种间电子传递产甲烷机理研究与技术应用[J].科学通报,2020,65(26):2820-2834.
[24] YAN W, ZHANG L, WIJAYA S M,et al.Unveiling the role of activated carbon on hydrolysis process in anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource technology,2020,296:122366.
[25] 秦向东,龚舒静,马俊花,等.7种添加剂对杂交狼尾草厌氧发酵产沼气的影响[J].中国沼气,2015,33(6):38-43.
[26] PALLAVI G,BANAFSHA A,SATYA B T,et al.Conductive material engineered direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) in anaerobic digestion: Mechanism and application[J]. Environmental technology & innovation,2020,20:101056.
[27] 马佳莹,汪冰寒,乔子茹,等.碳基材料对餐厨垃圾厌氧消化效率和微生物群落的影响研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2020,26(3):730-738.
[28] 李俊柔,陈婷,殷峻,等.导电材料提升有机废物厌氧发酵性能的效果及其机制[J].环境卫生工程,2019,27(2):1-7.
[29] 宋亚楠,宋梓梅,裴梦富,等.蔬菜类废弃物甲烷发酵的产气潜能及过程特征[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(2):645-653.
[30] 秦凯,陈芳清,张行,等.碳氮比对模拟水稻秸秆田间厌氧发酵系统甲烷生产和秸秆降解的影响[J].生物资源,2020, 42(3):342-348.
[31] 甘荣,葛明民,刘勇迪,等.活性炭在中高温条件下对玉米秸秆厌氧发酵的影响[J].环境科学,2017,38(6):2607-2616.
[32] ZHANG H, HAN X, TIAN Y,et al.Process analysis of anaerobic fermentation of Phragmites australis straw and cow dung exposing to elevated chromium (VI) concentrations[J]. Journal of environmental management,2018,224:414-424.
[33] 王璐瑶,谢潇.生物炭的制备及应用研究进展[J].农业与技术,2020,40(22):34-36.
[34] 曾瑞媛,冉薛伶,王彦博,等.2种吸附剂对鸡粪厌氧发酵产气特性的影响[J/OL].农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2021(5):2-10.
[35] 肖生苓,荆勇,冯晶,等.木质生物炭对厌氧发酵产甲烷性能的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2021,23(1):128-135.

活性炭对秸秆和猪粪混合厌氧发酵产生物甲烷的影响

Effect of activated carbon on methane production in the mixed anaerobic fermentation with straw and pig manure

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李春艳, 吕育财, 龚大春, 刘陈杰, 朱佳琪, 李宁. 餐厨垃圾两段式厌氧消化的性质研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(5): 70-75.
[2]	范凯轩, 钟永科. 椰壳活性炭改性后对百草枯吸附能力的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(4): 56-60.
[3]	范凯轩, 张鹃, 周巡, 刘雨瑶, 钟永科. 煤质活性炭改性对百草枯的去除探究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(3): 65-69.
[4]	王睿, 张冬冬, 郭鹏, 王轶, 章春芳, 陈磊. 活性炭-聚四氟乙烯电极对生物电化学系统中NH₄⁺-N去除的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(21): 81-87.
[5]	寇永珍, 林陶. 草海湿地湖滨带不同类型土壤甲烷产生与氧化潜力的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(11): 25-30.
[6]	陈天崖, 张世豪, 王亚茹, 邵蕾, 王仕鑫, 刘剑飞. 活性炭固定床吸附硝基苯废水性能研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(8): 71-73.
[7]	江超, 赵仲辉, 刘秉岳. 生物炭吸附填埋场温室气体试验[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(20): 35-39.