湖北农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (9): 151-157.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.09.027

• 信息工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于三维光谱指数的春小麦SPAD高光谱估算

刘晓翠, 吾木提·艾山江, 尼加提·卡斯木   

  1. 伊犁师范大学生物与地理科学学院/资源与生态研究所,新疆 伊宁 835000
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-15 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 尼加提·卡斯木(1991-),男(维吾尔族),新疆伊宁人,副教授,博士,主要从事高光谱遥感数值建模研究,(电话)13659980391(电子信箱)Nejatkasim@126.com。
  • 作者简介:刘晓翠(1999-),女,甘肃武威人,本科,主要从事遥感数值建模研究,(电话)17799379554(电子信箱)2207691212@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    伊犁师范大学博士科研启动基金项目(2020YSBSYJ001); 伊犁师范大学大学生创新训练项目(X20201076406)

SPAD hyperspectral estimation of spring wheat based on three dimensional spectral index

LIU Xiao-cui, Umut Hasan, Nijat Kasim   

  1. College of Biological and Geographical Sciences/Institute of Resources and Ecology, Yili Normal University, Yining 835000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2022-02-15 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-24

摘要: 为探讨三维光谱指数(TBI)对春小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)SPAD(Soil and plant analyzer development)估算的可行性,在田间尺度上以春小麦为目标,采集抽穗期冠层高光谱数据并计算任意波段组合的三维光谱指数,构建基于最优三维光谱指数的春小麦SPAD估算模型。结果表明,在400~ 1 300 nm波段处三维光谱指数TBI-1(849、850、850 nm)TBI-2(849、850、997 nm)TBI-3(850、849、850 nm)TBI-4(849、849、850 nm)分别与SPAD呈极显著相关(P<0.01);采用人工神经网络(ANN)、K近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM) 3种机器学习算法,建立春小麦SPAD估算模型,通过模型的估算对比发现,KNN算法构建的模型估算效果(R2=0.79,RMSE=2.68,RPD=2.25)优于ANN、SVR算法。

关键词: 春小麦(Triticum aestivum L.), SPAD, 机器学习, 三维光谱指数, 高光谱

Abstract: To explore the feasibility of estimating SPAD (Soil and plant analyzer development) of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using the three dimensional spectral index (TBI), this study focused on spring wheat at the field scale, collected canopy hyperspectral data at the heading stage, and calculated the three dimensional spectral index for any band combination to construct a SPAD estimation model for spring wheat based on the optimal three dimensional spectral index. The results showed that the three-dimensional spectral indexes TBI-1(849, 850, 850 nm), TBI-2(849, 850 997 nm), TBI-3(850, 849, 850 nm), and TBI-4(849, 849, 850 nm) were significantly correlated with SPAD at the range of 400~1 300 nm (P<0.01); a spring wheat SPAD estimation model was established using three machine learning algorithms: artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and support vector machine (SVM). By comparing the estimation results of the models, it was found that the model constructed using KNN algorithm had better estimation performance (R2=0.79, RMSE=2.68, RPD=2.25) than ANN and SVR algorithms.

Key words: spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), SPAD, machine learning, three-dimensional spectral index, hyperspectral

中图分类号: