政策工具下的中国耕地保护政策文本量化研究

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2019.19.042

湖北农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (19): 206-213.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2019.19.042

政策工具下的中国耕地保护政策文本量化研究

马向平¹, 潘蒙蒙²

1.中国地质大学（武汉）公共管理学院,武汉 430074;
2.中共荆门市委党校,湖北荆门 448000

收稿日期:2019-03-02 出版日期:2019-10-10 发布日期:2019-11-15
通讯作者: 潘蒙蒙（1991-）,女,湖北孝感人,讲师,硕士,主要从事土地资源公共政策研究,（电子信箱）1715036045@qq.com。
作者简介:马向平（1964-）,女,山东潍坊人,教授,硕士,主要从事资源政策研究,（电话）18672950432（电子信箱）maxiangping@126.com;

Research on text quantitative of China’s farmland protection policy from the perspective of policy tools

MA Xiang-ping¹, PAN Meng-meng²

1.School of Public Administration,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,China;
2.Jinmen Municipal Party School of the C.P.C.,Jinmen 448000,Hubei,China

Received:2019-03-02 Online:2019-10-10 Published:2019-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取2005—2017年国家发布的186份耕地保护政策文本为研究样本,利用文本量化分析法对政策制定主体协作、政策数量变化以及政策工具的配置情况进行了分析。结果表明,2005—2017年国家发布的耕地保护政策发文主体保持着多元化的特征,但协同性稍显欠缺;政策制定过程中,中央政府主导的特征明显;政策工具的配置存在着环境型政策工具应用过溢、供给型政策工具使用频率低下、需求型政策工具应用不足以及过度关注耕地的“建设”和“特色经营”功能,而对耕地的“吃饭”和“生态保护”功能的体现不足等结构性缺陷。针对上述政策制定过程中存在的不足,提出了未来政策调整的建议。

关键词: 政策工具, 耕地保护政策, 文本量化分析

Abstract: Taking the 186 cultivated land protection policy texts issued by the state from 2005 to 2017 as research samples, the cooperation of policy-making subjects, the change of policy quantity and the configuration of policy tools was analyzed by text quantitative analysis method. The results showed that the main body of cultivated land protection policy issued by the state from 2005 to 2017 remained a diversified feature but lack of synergy. There was an obvious characteristic that the central government dominated the policy-making process. In terms of policy tools allocation, there were some structure defects such as excessive application of environmental policy tools, low frequency of supply policy tools, insufficient application of demand policy tools. It payed too much attention on the functions of "construction" and "characteristic management" of cultivated land, but lacked in the functions of "eating" and "ecological protection". Finally, In view of the deficiencies in the above policy making process, some suggestions for future policy adjustments were put forward.

Key words: policy tools, cultivated land protection policy, text quantitative analysis

中图分类号:

F301.2

马向平, 潘蒙蒙. 政策工具下的中国耕地保护政策文本量化研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(19): 206-213.

MA Xiang-ping, PAN Meng-meng. Research on text quantitative of China’s farmland protection policy from the perspective of policy tools[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 58(19): 206-213.

参考文献 21

[1]	BEESLEY K B,RAMSEY D.Agricultural land preservation[J].International encyclopedia of human geography,2009,25(6):65-69.
[2]	WEIKARD H P,KIS A,UNGV RI G.A simple compensation mechanism for flood protection services on farmland[J].Land use policy,2017,65:128-134.
[3]	VALIPOUR M.Land use policy and agricultural water management of the previous half of century in Africa[J].Applied water science,2015,5(4):367-395.
[4]	BOLAY J C,SLAVA Z,MIODROG V,et al.Planning and land policy tools for limiting urban sprawl:The example of Belgrade[J].Spatium,2015,33(5):69-75.
[5]	牛海鹏,张杰,张安录.耕地保护经济补偿的基本问题分析及其政策路径[J].资源科学,2014,36(3):427-437.
[6]	曹瑞芬,张安录,万珂.耕地保护优先序省际差异及跨区域财政转移机制——基于耕地生态足迹与生态服务价值的实证分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(8):34-42.
[7]	欧文·E·休斯.公共管理导论[M].第二版.彭和平,周明德,金竹青,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.99.
[8]	ROBERTS C W.A conceptual framework for quantitative text analysis on joining probabilities and substantive inferences about texts[J].Quality & quantity,2000,34:259-274.
[9]	MAMOUNEY L.Environmental policy-making in New South Wales 1979-2010:A quantitative analysis[J].Australasian journal of environmental management,2014,21(3):241-252.
[10]	BEAUGUITTE L,RICHARD Y,GUÉRIN-PACE F. The EU and its neighbourhoods:A textual analysis on key documents of the European neighbourhood policy[J].Geopolitics,2015,20(4):853-879.
[11]	邱均平,邹菲.国外内容分析法的研究概况及进展[J].图书情报知识,2003,12(6):6-8.
[12]	王亮亮,彭晓东.国内外管理科学学科发展趋势研究——基于内容分析法[J].科学学研究,2007,25(5):959-962.
[13]	李燕萍,吴绍棠,郜斐,等.改革开放以来我国科研经费管理政策的变迁、评价与走向——基于政策文本的内容分析[J].科学学研究,2009,27(10):1441-1447.
[14]	黄萃,苏竣,施丽萍,等.中国高新技术产业税收优惠政策文本量化研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(10):46-54.
[15]	黄萃,苏竣,施丽萍,等.政策工具视角的中国风能政策文本量化研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(6):876-882.
[16]	曾婧婧.泛珠三角区域合作政策文本量化分析:2004—2014[J].中国行政管理,2015(7):110-116.
[17]	许阳. 中国海洋环境治理的政策工具选择与应用——基于1982—2016年政策文本的量化分析[J].太平洋学报,2017, 25(10):49-59.
[18]	ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Reindusdalization and technology[M].London:Logman group limited,1985.83-104.
[19]	姜申未.立足耕地多功能,以分类促进保护[EB/OL].http://www.zgtdxh.org.cn/tdr/wslt/27tdr/gdbh/201706/t20170623_1512077.htm,2017-06-23.
[20]	MILNE M J,DLER R W.Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis[J].Accounting auditing & accountability journal,1999,12(2):237-256.
[21]	KLINE J,WICHELNS D.Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs[J].Land economics,1996, 72(4):538-549.

政策工具下的中国耕地保护政策文本量化研究

Research on text quantitative of China’s farmland protection policy from the perspective of policy tools

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴正平, 倪志强, 夏颖婷. 科技援疆政策特征分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(15): 161-166.
[2]	王茁, 卓成刚, 黄凯丽. 政策工具视角下的中国耕地保护路径与特征——基于1986—2017年政策文本的量化分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(13): 109-116.