不同光波对烟田金龟甲成虫的诱集效果及其益害比分析

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.03.016

湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (3): 106-111.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.03.016

不同光波对烟田金龟甲成虫的诱集效果及其益害比分析

范龙¹, 张铜津¹, 沈珉¹, 蒋悦¹, 王涛¹, 胡峰², 李彩斌¹, 黄衍章²

1.贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司,贵州毕节 551713;
2.安徽农业大学植物保护学院,合肥 230036

收稿日期:2025-11-18 出版日期:2026-03-25 发布日期:2026-04-09
通讯作者: 黄衍章(1975-),男,副教授,主要从事有害生物绿色防控方面的教学和科研工作,(电子信箱)huangyz@ahau.edu.cn。
作者简介:范龙(1993-),男,四川南充人,农艺师,硕士,主要从事烟叶生产技术研究,(电子信箱)1806889961@qq.com。
基金资助:
贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司重点研发项目(2023520500240164)

Attraction effects of different light spectra on adult scarab beetles in tobacco fields and analysis of their beneficial-to-harmful insect ratios

FAN Long¹, ZHANG Tong-jin¹, SHEN Min¹, JIANG Yue¹, WANG Tao¹, HU Feng², LI Cai-bin¹, HUANG Yan-zhang²

1. Bijie Branch, Guizhou Tobacco Company, Bijie 551713, Guizhou, China;
2. School of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

Received:2025-11-18 Published:2026-03-25 Online:2026-04-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为精准防控烟草金龟甲为害,采用定点诱捕法研究了4种光波对贵州省威宁县烟田金龟甲成虫的诱集效果及其对主要益虫的安全性。供试4种诱集光波特征分别为：1#,330~420 nm,峰值350、370 nm;2#,330~600 nm,峰值350、380、560 nm;3#,570~680 nm,峰值605、628、650 nm;4#,330~490 nm,峰值350 nm。结果表明,4种光波对金龟甲成虫的诱集效果表现为2#>4#>1#>3#,其中2#光波的诱集效果最好。2#光波对小阔胫玛绢金龟、阔胫玛绢金龟和东方绢金龟3种关键金龟甲的诱集数量最多,累计为 1 693头,占该光波诱集总量的26.19%;4#光波次之,累计诱集1 215头,占比为26.80%。安全性分析显示,2#光波的诱集益害比最低,为0.016。趋光节律研究表明,金龟甲夜间趋光活动主要集中于20:00—24:00,3种关键金龟甲在22:00—24:00时段的诱集数量最高(187头),其次为20:00—22:00(96头)。综合分析认为,2#光波对金龟甲害虫及关键种类的诱集效果最优,且益害比最低,在烟田应用中安全性较好,最佳诱集时段建议为20:00—24:00。

关键词: 烟田, 金龟甲, 光波诱杀, 诱集益害比, 趋光节律

Abstract: To achieve precise control of tobacco scarab beetle damage, a fixed-point trapping method was employed to investigate the attraction effects of four light spectra on adult scarab beetles in tobacco fields of Weining County, Guizhou Province, as well as their safety for major beneficial insects. The characteristics of the four tested light spectra were as follows: 1#, 330-420 nm, with peak wavelengths at 350 and 370 nm; 2#, 330-600 nm, with peak wavelengths at 350, 380, and 560 nm; 3#, 570-680 nm, with peak wavelengths at 605, 628, and 650 nm; 4#, 330-490 nm, with a peak wavelength at 350 nm. The results showed that the attractiveness of the four light spectra to adult scarab beetles followed the order of 2# > 4# > 1# > 3#, with spectrum 2# exhibiting the highest attraction effect. Spectrum 2# attracted the greatest number of three key scarab beetle species: Maladera verticalis, Maladera ovatula, and Maladera orientalis, with a cumulative total of 1 693 individuals, accounting for 26.19% of the total insects trapped by this spectrum. Spectrum 4# ranked second, trapping a total of 1 215 individuals, representing 26.80% of its total catch. The safety analysis showed that spectrum 2# had the lowest beneficial-to-harmful insect ratio, with a value of 0.016. Analysis of phototactic rhythm revealed that the nocturnal phototactic activity of scarab beetles was mainly concentrated between 20:00 and 24:00. The highest number of the three key scarab beetle species was trapped during 22:00-24:00 (187 individuals), followed by 20:00-22:00 (96 individuals). Comprehensive analysis indicated that spectrum 2# demonstrated the optimal attraction effect for scarab beetle pests and key species, along with the lowest beneficial-to-harmful insect ratio, indicating good safety for application in tobacco fields. The optimal trapping period was recommended to be from 20:00 to 24:00.

Key words: tobacco field, scarab beetle, light spectrum trapping, beneficial-to-harmful insect ratio after trapping, phototactic rhythm

中图分类号:

S435.72
S477

范龙, 张铜津, 沈珉, 蒋悦, 王涛, 胡峰, 李彩斌, 黄衍章. 不同光波对烟田金龟甲成虫的诱集效果及其益害比分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(3): 106-111.

FAN Long, ZHANG Tong-jin, SHEN Min, JIANG Yue, WANG Tao, HU Feng, LI Cai-bin, HUANG Yan-zhang. Attraction effects of different light spectra on adult scarab beetles in tobacco fields and analysis of their beneficial-to-harmful insect ratios[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2026, 65(3): 106-111.

参考文献

[1] 杨广东,熊桂莲,张文辉.三种常见地下害虫的发生规律及综合防治方法[J].现代园艺,2010,33(4):32-33.
[2] 张美翠,尹姣,李克斌,等.地下害虫蛴螬的发生与防治研究进展[J].中国植保导刊,2014,34(10):20-28.
[3] AMIZHTHINI S,YASODHA P,ROSELEEN S S J,et al. Global species diversity, bioecology and management of white grubs in crops: A review[J].International journal of tropical insect science,2024,44(5):2259-2285.
[4] 秦雪峰,吕文彦,杜开书,等.草坪蛴螬种群调查及综合治理研究[J].河南农业科学,2007(2):56-57.
[5] ZHANG J H,WANG S,YANG S,et al.Differential proteome analysis of the male and female antennae from Holotrichia parallela[J].Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology,2016,92(4):274-287.
[6] 张亚南,刘雨欣,李梦瑶,等.4种不同药剂对马铃薯蛴螬的防治效果评价[J].农药,2021,60(10):775-777.
[7] 刘保才,王俊琪,孙国语.蔬菜病虫害化学防治中的3R问题与科学使用农药[J].上海蔬菜,2004(6):68-69.
[8] 高希武. 我国害虫化学防治现状与发展策略[J].植物保护,2010,36(4):19-22.
[9] ELMOWITZ D E,EBSSA L,KOPPENHÖFER A M. Overwintering behavior of the entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema scarabaei and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and their white grub hosts[J]. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata,2013,148(3):246-258.
[10] 彭国雄,张淑玲,夏玉先.金龟子绿僵菌CQMa421农药及应用情况[J].中国生物防治学报,2020,36(6):850-857.
[11] GLAZER I,SANTOIEMMA G,BATTISTI A, et al.Invasion of Popillia japonica in Lombardy, Italy: Interactions with soil entomopathogenic nematodes and native grubs[J].Agricultural and forest entomology, 2022,24(4):600-608.
[12] 付国需,李为争,吴少英,等.桃蚜对不同单色光趋性反应的测定[J].昆虫学报,2009,52(10):1171-1176.
[13] YANG J Y,SUNG B K,LEE H S.Phototactic behavior 8: Phototactic behavioral responses of western flower Thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), to light-emitting diodes[J].Journal of the Korean society for applied biological chemistry,2015,58(3):359-363.
[14] 周向平,蒋笃忠,沈力,等.太阳能诱虫灯诱杀烟草害虫的效果研究[J].湖南农业科学,2012(19):90-92.
[15] 方加兴,申卫星,孟宪鹏,等.泰山黑虎峪灯下金龟甲种群结构及其发生动态研究[J].中国植保导刊,2016,36(6):40-43.
[16] KUMAR S,PANDEY A K,ANOKHE A.Response of light traps to attract various species of Scarabaeid beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)[J].International journal of tropical insect science,2025,45(2):635-648.
[17] 唐良德,梁延坡,赵海燕,等.瓢虫的趋光性反应研究[J].环境昆虫学报,2016,38(2):337-340.
[18] 刘思雨,户艳霞,范志勇,等.烟草田间蛴螬种类及其空间分布与抽样技术研究[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(11):2722-2730.
[19] 张瑞平,李斌,胡建新,等.四川省攀枝花市烟区烟田金龟子种群动态初步研究[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(3):1119-1123.
[20] 许浩,文礼章,陈坤.湖南烟田常见金龟子种类及其识别调查研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(21):221-228.
[21] 刘福顺,冯晓洁,刘春琴,等.河北沧州花生田蛴螬发生动态及影响因素分析[J].中国植保导刊,2022,42(4):33-37.
[22] TANG G B,SONG B Z,ZHAO L L,et al.Repellent and attractive effects of herbs on insects in pear orchards intercropped with aromatic plants[J].Agroforestry systems,2013,87(2):273-285.
[23] SHI L Q,VASSEUR L,HUANG H S,et al.Adult tea green leafhoppers, Empoasca onukii (Matsuda), change behaviors under varying light conditions[J].PLoS one,2017,12(1):e0168439.
[24] LI Y Y,ZHANG H,DUAN Z,et al.Optical characterization of agricultural pest insects: A methodological study in the spectral and time domains[J].Applied physics B,2016,122(8):213.
[25] 吕飞,海小霞,范凡,等.黑绒鳃金龟甲成虫对不同单色光和光强的趋光行为[J].植物保护学报,2016,43(4):656-661.
[26] 蒋月丽,段云,武予清.三种不同波长绿-黄光对甜菜夜蛾产卵生物学的影响[J].植物保护学报,2008,35(5):473-474.
[27] SAUNDERS D S.Insect photoperiodism: Seeing the light[J].Physiological entomology,2012,37(3):207-218.
[28] 郭华伟,唐美君,周孝贵,等.五种诱集光源对茶园昆虫的诱集效果评价[J].中国茶叶,2015,37(11):20-21.

不同光波对烟田金龟甲成虫的诱集效果及其益害比分析

Attraction effects of different light spectra on adult scarab beetles in tobacco fields and analysis of their beneficial-to-harmful insect ratios

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价