腐殖酸水溶肥施用量及其与微生物菌剂联合施用对小香葱产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.08.011

湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (8): 74-79.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.08.011

腐殖酸水溶肥施用量及其与微生物菌剂联合施用对小香葱产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响

李笑媛, 李思雨, 吴旭, 杨洪力, 李旭, 王祥, 王祥向

红河哈尼族彝族自治州农业科学院,云南蒙自 661100

收稿日期:2026-05-11 发布日期:2026-09-02
通讯作者: 王祥向（1995-）,男,云南会泽人,在读博士研究生,农艺师,主要从事作物生理生态与产量品质形成研究,（电子信箱）1973684942@qq.com。
作者简介:李笑媛（1996-）,女,云南昆明人,农艺师,硕士,主要从事土壤肥料研究及技术推广工作,（电子信箱）785166223@qq.com
基金资助:
2025年中央耕地保护与质量提升项目

Effects of combined application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer at different application rates and microbial inoculants on yield, quality and soil physicochemical properties of scallion

LI Xiao-yuan, LI Si-yu, WU Xu, YANG Hong-li, LI Xu, WANG Xiang, WANG Xiang-xiang

Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Mengzi 661100, Yunnan, China

Received:2026-05-11 Online:2026-09-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以小香葱（Allium ascalonicum L.）为研究对象,采用随机区组排列试验,喷施不同次数的腐殖酸水溶肥、微生物菌剂、腐殖酸水溶肥+微生物菌剂,研究腐殖酸水溶肥、腐殖酸水溶肥联合微生物菌剂对小香葱生长、产量及品质的影响。结果表明,施用2次腐殖酸水溶肥（HF₂）小香葱生长指标、产量、品质指标比常规施肥和施用1次腐殖酸水溶肥（HF₁）均有明显增加,与施用3次腐殖酸水溶肥（HF₃）无显著差异。与仅施用腐殖酸水溶肥相比,联合施用腐殖酸水溶肥与微生物菌剂小香葱生长指标、产量、品质和土壤养分含量均明显提高。与施用1次腐殖酸水溶肥+微生物菌剂（BF₁）相比,施用2次腐殖酸水溶肥+微生物菌剂（BF₂）小香葱株高、茎粗、分蘖数、单株叶片数和地上部生物量均显著增加,产量增加3.80 t/hm²,纯收入增加15 093元/hm²,产投比增加1.21,粗纤维、维生素C含量分别显著增加2.33、14.20 mg/kg,土壤中碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾含量分别增加6.23%、5.96%和2.95%;微生物菌剂联合施用3次腐殖酸水溶肥（BF₃）各指标与微生物菌剂联合施用2次腐殖酸水溶肥（BF₂）相比,各项指标均无显著差异。因此,在小香葱上微生物菌肥联合施用2次腐殖酸水溶肥效果最佳。

关键词: 小香葱（Allium ascalonicum L.）, 腐殖酸水溶肥, 微生物菌剂, 产量, 品质, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: Scallions were used as test materials in a randomized block experiment. Treatments included foliar sprays of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer applied at different frequencies, microbial inoculants alone, and the combined application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer and microbial inoculants, to explore their effects on the growth, yield and quality of scallion. The results showed that plant growth, yield and quality were markedly improved under two applications of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer (HF₂) compared with conventional fertilization and one application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer (HF₁), whereas no significant differences were found between HF₂ and three applications of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer (HF₃). Compared with a single application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer, combined application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer and microbial inoculants significantly improved growth traits, yield, quality of scallion and soil nutrient contents. Compared with one application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer combined with microbial inoculant (BF₁), two applications of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer combined with microbial inoculant (BF₂) significantly improved plant height, stem diameter, tiller number, leaf number per plant and aboveground biomass of scallion. The yield increased by 3.80 t/hm², net income rose by 15 093 yuan/hm², and the input-output ratio increased by 1.21. Crude fibre and vitamin C contents were significantly elevated by 2.33 mg/kg and 14.20 mg/kg, respectively. The contents of alkaline-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium in soil increased by 6.23%, 5.96% and 2.95%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in all measured indicators between three applications of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer combined with microbial inoculant (BF₃) and BF₂treatment. Consequently, the treatment of microbial inoculant plus two applications of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer achieved the optimal effect on scallion.

Key words: scallion (Allium ascalonicum L.), humic acid water-soluble fertilizer, microbial inoculants, yield, quality, soil physicochemical properties

中图分类号:

S633.9

李笑媛, 李思雨, 吴旭, 杨洪力, 李旭, 王祥, 王祥向. 腐殖酸水溶肥施用量及其与微生物菌剂联合施用对小香葱产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(8): 74-79.

LI Xiao-yuan, LI Si-yu, WU Xu, YANG Hong-li, LI Xu, WANG Xiang, WANG Xiang-xiang. Effects of combined application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer at different application rates and microbial inoculants on yield, quality and soil physicochemical properties of scallion[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2026, 65(8): 74-79.

参考文献

[1] 陈琴,张力,宋焕忠,等.不同施肥处理对香葱生长、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2021,34(10):92-97.
[2] 郭必府. 泸西县小香葱品种选育及栽培技术总结[D].昆明:云南农业大学,2024.
[3] 段向东. 泸西县小香葱产业发展的现状与对策[J].农家参谋, 2020(17):295.
[4] 瞿华蓥,雷叶舒,高文.乡村振兴战略背景下泸西小香葱特色产业研究[J].产业创新研究,2024(13):97-99.
[5] 李若清. 腐殖酸水溶肥对芦笋生长·产量及营养成分的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2024,52(17):164-166,254.
[6] 张世远. 叶面喷施腐殖酸类水溶肥对万寿菊生长发育的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2024.
[7] 王雅婷,陈子平,陈世金,等.腐植酸肥料增产作物与改良土壤研究新进展[J].腐植酸,2023(4):21-26.
[8] 张志奎,鹿启智,余忠保,等.有机腐殖酸高活性液肥在蔬菜生产上的应用研究[J].现代农业科技,2013(7):83,86.
[9] 何孝英. 腐植酸叶面肥对柠檬主要次生代谢产物的影响[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2018.
[10] 张曼丽,陈剑山,柳晓磊,等.水溶肥配施微生物菌剂对海南设施哈密瓜产量及土壤的影响[J].中国农技推广,2017,33(2):54-56.
[11] 孔祥馨,梁发辉,王丽娟.枯草芽孢杆菌对草莓生长及品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2025(5):25-30.
[12] 崔佳,崔莹,张晓红,等.生物菌肥配施土壤调理剂对连作番茄产量及土壤微生态的影响[J].北方园艺,2025(10):103-110.
[13] DAWOOD M G, ABDEL-BAKY Y R, EL-AWADI M E, et al. Enhancement quality and quantity of faba bean plants grown under sandy soil conditions by nicotinamide and/or humic acid application[J]. Bulletin of the national research centre, 2019, 43(1):28.
[14] FAN H M, WANG X W, SUN X, et al.Effects of humic acid derived from sediments on growth, photosynthesis and chloroplast ultrastructure in Chrysanthemum[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2014, 177:118-123.
[15] 毕军,夏光利,毕研文,等.腐殖酸生物活性肥料对冬小麦生长及土壤微生物活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(1):99-103.
[16] 杜会英. 腐植酸改善葡萄营养的效应与机理[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2004.
[17] 王洋娟. 微生物菌肥对苹果树体生长及病害防控的研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.
[18] WU Z, ZHAO Y, KALEEM I, et al.Preparation of calcium-alginate microcapsuled microbialfertilizer coating Klebsiella oxytoca Rs-5 and its performance under salinity stress[J]. European journal of soil biology, 2011, 47(2):152-159.
[19] 李庆康,王志明,袁灿生,等.生态肥对蔬菜产量及品质的影响[J].长江蔬菜,2001(4):35-36.
[20] 王明友,杨秀凤,郑宪和,等.复合微生物菌剂对番茄的光合特性及产量品质的影响[J].土壤肥料,2004(4):37-39.
[21] 普继雄,赵娟莉,马桂梅,等.微生物菌剂对大棚草莓产量和品质的影响[J].云南农业科技,2023(5):12-13,22.
[22] 吾斯曼·依马尔尼牙孜,沈其云,木斯塔怕·海比布,等.微生物菌剂与腐殖酸水溶肥联用对不同土壤质地葡萄生长的影响[J].农业开发与装备,2025(4):122-124.

腐殖酸水溶肥施用量及其与微生物菌剂联合施用对小香葱产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响

Effects of combined application of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer at different application rates and microbial inoculants on yield, quality and soil physicochemical properties of scallion

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨婉蓉, 郑福维, 解娜, 帅子昂, 帅细强. 湘早籼45号稻米品质对气象因子的响应[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(8): 8-13.
[2]	信彩云, 李襄良, 马惠, 杨军, 辛淑荣. 氮磷减施互作对济宁市水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(8): 14-18.
[3]	李菲, 杨再强, 赵梦凡, 钟存, 李璠. 低温冻害对油菜叶片光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(8): 24-31.
[4]	畅天舒, 崔素倩, 郝心雨, 张永胜, 李会彬, 王丽宏, 刘廷辉, 刘忠宽. 切根处理对苜蓿产量及主要害虫种群发生动态的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(8): 84-89.
[5]	阳永学, 易沭远, 陈峰, 李佩璇, 陈法志, 王湛昌. 三种干燥工艺对卷丹百合品质影响的对比研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(8): 141-145.
[6]	张莹莹, 李莓, 罗丽娅, 祝培, 许本波, 徐劲松, 张学昆. 不同基因型油菜对赤霉素调控的差异响应[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(7): 1-5.
[7]	金迪, 雷然, 艾堂顺, 秦欢, 刘龙, 吴亚滨. 乙烯利催熟对油菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(7): 12-16.
[8]	彭银, 张建华, 孙信成, 黄蓉蓉, 岳峰, 田菊英, 白伟涛, 蒋万, 杨连勇, 黄友化. 不同颜色棚膜对矮生菜豆品质和产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(7): 110-113.
[9]	申忠国, 吕朝燕, 隋常玲, 钱正敏, 韩畅. 不同配方营养液对金钗石斛幼苗生长及品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(7): 127-132.
[10]	李阳, 田茂涛, 张作林, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 谢艺, 程建平. 长江中游地区再生稻品种丰产性和稻米品质分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 1-8.
[11]	李昌焱, 王建宇, 胡容, 张作林, 付冬, 周浩, 田贵生, 游艾青, 陈志军, 周雷. 基于52份优质籼型杂交稻的湖北省再生稻适宜品种筛选[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 9-13.
[12]	闫振华, 罗真, 戴宝生, 赵树琪, 何涛, 张华崇, 黄晓莉, 张欣, 李蔚. 高产杂交棉冈0996和冈杂棉10号F₁的杂种优势及相关性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 14-19.
[13]	张超一, 纪元, 刁红霞, 宋海妹. 海藻提取物配施液体肥对旱作玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 20-25.
[14]	李大华, 梁大熠, 冯春生, 曾莉, 杨梅, 罗华龙, 魏国余. 不同间伐经营模式对灰木莲林分生长量和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 117-123.
[15]	余小红, 赖崇健, 李维维, 蔡林, 陈乃健, 吴红英. 菌种用量对大球盖菇产量和农艺性状的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 124-127.