HTTP状态 404 - 未找到

HTTP状态 404 - 未找到


类型 状态报告

描述 源服务器未能找到目标资源的表示或者是不愿公开一个已经存在的资源表示。


Apache Tomcat

�??JFIFHH�?�ExifMM*bj(1r2��i??HHAdobe Photoshop 7.02009:10:16 13:00:33?��?��?(& ?HH�??JFIFHH�? Adobe_CM�?Adobed��??            �?�a"�?�??   3!1AQa"q?�”B#$R�b34r��C%�S疳�cs5⒉?D�TdE拢t6�U�e虺�糜u泱F'���脑漪サ耪艴Vfv��Χ浦骣7GWgw��Х亲琪5!1AQaq"2��”B#�R佯3$b�r��CScs4?⒉?&5乱D�T?dEU6te怛�糜u泱F���脑漪サ耪艴Vfv��Χ浦骣'7GWgw��Х?? ?黹够��Z?"??VUE?��V邛???j�Yt\�a��饩喊��CF�赝���8�WU�p-$�B?�\GX§0驺2���h|6fY揽�s��??B?[" ?;向��z]��x秧'�许��n3$��e��93畹蠼漕��5?�m豚佑�r]��D���模J\�~�Y潺�I?psL9�Z|��}?��??f?�A陀�SO@���E5は'�O���盐^S�趾�盗?�?��Me鬈靛??b柁镯mC�z��7��?荦�腌鳏�I?须?X> ~D;?%�k�7n唇キ;�n??�i�匆�h��.o?P氏m?拨包�c匡�c1�???�绠o��[^江!�s嵛埴&C�Y��烤�~?v�kg?:Xi��E��o�{l糙�_巾{C_u�Rp瑕�宜2r?�}? C犏W蕹q?�e�f刳j?�VMDX�nx{i��胲�???9�O�v9"E�X�;x9��wJ�v-滓m/k+uls�k+xk]�VE�zl坑{谔6c��?��P崎t槌?�V?l48�{kj�c>�璨�髡g衄kWHLn?符�`N 吩p��M?�W��?k=m精�Ec��W挥�E侦合?F�s~��c^Z�k�]�苕�u?i}��m-�v婊音饔殪鼹���? r琢?�D湿�s2)ュ粽m�憎r?�eot?��Ew�II龌?��j?鸦扎�V锥哆S��?�w- l候(e? x????=吸�@堡?��l?�� d��\7?�髅g峪�?W再U坍册/x腮�n�]�O�k}&U[��%?�z�芬�g�Y斐o�g���.�赙�WK6解���Ot2%�?#0��^�n蒋?K�蹩�WG1�}横???-/劢,gQ?v臼掮d组0>�Wf6G�缸U8?Q懦�}?��|��%��刳揿��宸X?铉u�Z弦{唪?m.?4T�K�朽侣�@?诳�\�U冻�l&哇ld;q?���|W�U?��q?���lw�BWT�x��h?�a�]dX�[Y?�~S1�c?X综�g榭?B�xu,{:?偏[ �e幻Z娑г?{з?IU吨9�N?O?麂#edL消?原H��U��Μ�LJ�n��)�S�{肴v叨竹cs]聚?淡{�m��_�eb苋虢"�画u���]�c���a��s�~?��W�{��椠/耶x=�I0�c寄$l? 嗔��(雷M+Bㄧ��M�t�n?#++壮%�x�cY{?みN?=�B�O�U�B+/��惨��-?锿O?镖?葆?�v�RH?B?q?�宜?��QSp骶?y�4��?.�贳�淀k�Oi?yx�Ur?_ヤ��6�q�霆_乔��� 墁�r_�wr��牿l`??综茄?�G?[e[ヒ4'�`p��蝶��?Jl�Lo o?L�O畸+/��?��?}??��HD�g7B%����?部T��3Nk&`|aoB>���(?�s@'I???�^g�H*[ZyN�HT���??�x?2��?v�u�5/w�R\戌���W�桡峁����D?绀o�~{��=?|�~���?.秉?扩?�u< ??�?喉�z���Ы缑R�沧F忡@?a 虼�z??Kq��?���??hPhotoshop 3.08BIM%8BIM?HH8BIM&?�8BIM x8BIM8BIM? 8BIM 8BIM' 8BIM?H/fflff/ff�?2Z5-8BIM?p����������������������?����������������������?����������������������?����������������������?8BIM8BIM8BIM@@8BIM8BIM???g*h��-1??nullboundsObjcRct1Top longLeftlongBtomlong?Rghtlong?slicesVlLsObjcslicesliceIDlonggroupIDlongoriginenum ESliceOrigin autoGeneratedTypeenum ESliceTypeImg boundsObjcRct1Top longLeftlongBtomlong?Rghtlong?urlTEXTnullTEXTMsgeTEXTaltTagTEXTcellTextIsHTMLboolcellTextTEXT horzAlignenumESliceHorzAligndefault vertAlignenumESliceVertAligndefault bgColorTypeenumESliceBGColorTypeNone topOutsetlong leftOutsetlong bottomOutsetlong rightOutsetlong8BIM8BIM8BIM ?a�$? ?�??JFIFHH�? Adobe_CM�?Adobed��??            �?�a"�?�??   3!1AQa"q?�”B#$R�b34r��C%�S疳�cs5⒉?D�TdE拢t6�U�e虺�糜u泱F'���脑漪サ耪艴Vfv��Χ浦骣7GWgw��Х亲琪5!1AQaq"2��”B#�R佯3$b�r��CScs4?⒉?&5乱D�T?dEU6te怛�糜u泱F���脑漪サ耪艴Vfv��Χ浦骣'7GWgw��Х?? ?黹够��Z?"??VUE?��V邛???j�Yt\�a��饩喊��CF�赝���8�WU�p-$�B?�\GX§0驺2���h|6fY揽�s��??B?[" ?;向��z]��x秧'�许��n3$��e��93畹蠼漕��5?�m豚佑�r]��D���模J\�~�Y潺�I?psL9�Z|��}?��??f?�A陀�SO@���E5は'�O���盐^S�趾�盗?�?��Me鬈靛??b柁镯mC�z��7��?荦�腌鳏�I?须?X> ~D;?%�k�7n唇キ;�n??�i�匆�h��.o?P氏m?拨包�c匡�c1�???�绠o��[^江!�s嵛埴&C�Y��烤�~?v�kg?:Xi��E��o�{l糙�_巾{C_u�Rp瑕�宜2r?�}? C犏W蕹q?�e�f刳j?�VMDX�nx{i��胲�???9�O�v9"E�X�;x9��wJ�v-滓m/k+uls�k+xk]�VE�zl坑{谔6c��?��P崎t槌?�V?l48�{kj�c>�璨�髡g衄kWHLn?符�`N 吩p��M?�W��?k=m精�Ec��W挥�E侦合?F�s~��c^Z�k�]�苕�u?i}��m-�v婊音饔殪鼹���? r琢?�D湿�s2)ュ粽m�憎r?�eot?��Ew�II龌?��j?鸦扎�V锥哆S��?�w- l候(e? x????=吸�@堡?��l?�� d��\7?�髅g峪�?W再U坍册/x腮�n�]�O�k}&U[��%?�z�芬�g�Y斐o�g���.�赙�WK6解���Ot2%�?#0��^�n蒋?K�蹩�WG1�}横???-/劢,gQ?v臼掮d组0>�Wf6G�缸U8?Q懦�}?��|��%��刳揿��宸X?铉u�Z弦{唪?m.?4T�K�朽侣�@?诳�\�U冻�l&哇ld;q?���|W�U?��q?���lw�BWT�x��h?�a�]dX�[Y?�~S1�c?X综�g榭?B�xu,{:?偏[ �e幻Z娑г?{з?IU吨9�N?O?麂#edL消?原H��U��Μ�LJ�n��)�S�{肴v叨竹cs]聚?淡{�m��_�eb苋虢"�画u���]�c���a��s�~?��W�{��椠/耶x=�I0�c寄$l? 嗔��(雷M+Bㄧ��M�t�n?#++壮%�x�cY{?みN?=�B�O�U�B+/��惨��-?锿O?镖?葆?�v�RH?B?q?�宜?��QSp骶?y�4��?.�贳�淀k�Oi?yx�Ur?_ヤ��6�q�霆_乔��� 墁�r_�wr��牿l`??综茄?�G?[e[ヒ4'�`p��蝶��?Jl�Lo o?L�O畸+/��?��?}??��HD�g7B%����?部T��3Nk&`|aoB>���(?�s@'I???�^g�H*[ZyN�HT���??�x?2��?v�u�5/w�R\戌���W�桡峁����D?绀o�~{��=?|�~���?.秉?扩?�u< ??�?喉�z���Ы缑R�沧F忡@?a 虼�z??Kq��?���?8BIM!UAdobe PhotoshopAdobe Photoshop 7.08BIM�?Hhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ adobe:docid:photoshop:46a575a0-b9f9-11de-8233-f05547954a70 �?Adobed�??         �???�?�??  s!1AQa"q?2���B#�R厌3b?r��%C4S�⒉cs?D'��?Tdt靡?&? ��EFごV�U(蜚竽凿�eu��サ耪艴fv��Χ浦骣7GWgw��Х亲琪8HXhx��ǜ蓉桫)9IYiy��┕少轾*:JZjz���菏陉�m!1AQa"q��2”?裂?BRbr?$4C?�S%�c猜s?�D?T? &6E'dtU7颍趁()鱼��ご脑漪eu��サ耪艴FVfv��Χ浦骣GWgw��Х亲琪8HXhx��ǜ蓉桫9IYiy��┕少轾*:JZjz���菏陉��? ?肀M鹄I堍最?ш-)�H)Z?甘4V��f%�]B�@"�埚\?? ��T�G�W�^�gd??TY m�T��c��*:��7犸��/{??[�Y;?�j?HZ�I�R��So?�`D��正1�M疃钪?�p'. ?N藁d颁��??I2?�┬q�c�e��验???Vq??�q�QEeu�Djx �R:跛�[L过?Ld�Ju�s��m�o?-?P��M�'z>��?R?s⑼?zU�MN�]M�U�?�p*??m佰�i6净W?��k[ \?R��?��#L?译h �i�G晗>?y/?��?���C�Kxd�d �\阏+7kn�l��h碑[舱��k��@x^衡Mj�@j�R�rs哟苊���r?}G�9��?�墨}?亍ca 赆U��Rmpa�H-鋈?擞J?��~?穸O�与��?��{��霞�U$S*,�W?�Zd��\?;�c\坩嫜8�j3�p9?�(�\PH/=?��R�?M��?vO��Z�Nd5-媵a�p� ��E�^��B齐?}?st�[\!r?�U\�d��?|<:��`d��蚤QK(E5?�{?3?vQ]�iJ��?$-�U&?�r�`�F??�K6脞3g�@?�^��J?噶 艽1�R�jT辊T麦,yl?k��i����G荜%�{准痢iq�V�Vp�K㈤o Et?ǒ @??过尢���9f?BdI?威��劁�????�?钮���H,�K�M��x�R"��迂?��'C仁Y �G?l改?1掰�S渫?G]粥I嫉,铵���!13r��?�A?遐��?}u?I5`��}Jib�^�t��璃�I�yfuG-uk^?腔.�I烨隧eR?G戬�e�Rm?���QI<希菹�描Cb??��?��?d�K&�]�`G��??��&_藐?'�Z?,�u茎i ��{5��)0�YP?Q纽R~�_�e$�vA羰>�柰���W?钮ir�w?u���w$�Q攒捧{x�PA+ .�r嵘?��$�oO ?�D �\S?夫沂�o3鸶1人kxD���1 ?�N?杖�m?�?=���F�k?H#-正?j���V2兢`??�o?蠕??��R�D8�B�e扦C�U�L[qV��,��?&猁�ZP5O?KFda昃g�F�Kn?�②,泥J??��?�j�`队m�`}3@�w#栉+����e�?檗e??道��R???��?3�l? �i��?�萘瘙�~#E?�|?珍???;赧彤mQ�v尜-�z�V�ebK?r孺?|史�墨s泠~,�M>?�H��t2??鳎��问�I菊-b�^亓Z���祉�诱?O?�}.<���袱c!�_�O?'3,A�c��A ? �闳�%"��K�m�dya?BGU�~圆o鹚痄�d-碎�q1��u�耆�k鹏"�yn�G-QH5g�R6f��?G{倭诜z镏挤?りQ ?U竟?�yp�h)?���G.9?��L?��i�bx��5帧��tWv�qwW-:簧%k昵E_M腼����q 愕]�D待-娅U5 �W?|9$�LP��)�K??z[t�c?��.�b�逯��吊��?6�tS$Q�Q??厦�W?�3?),??� e�G��?{agh����k��鄯�?,������O痼g�?�um'掘G��还?k劢H^?殍??�p9ro�忑�I9p驱�a?匐/R_��g?b宴�SG?祠ID比裁元��C?蜾�s���w?:ㄋ?7?U�冻?釉CF�j7弋d馐2DHr.<�F��?�}>?穸O�?�y★�{G�U�C?�iZS%��?q���㈣'?q�h饕��u�J��`A汰Gc 贬2?耠�M?_�y@“咴?�Nj啃?T�a�l�S?望Z��I�d��R{��瘀�G�P�?闾Z邀T纯<5�|M��芝柜瘀9<咎?����y2�K?�V?所�?~m涓&`����>*  a#=r\�Z��1X=拥??�c楂>�B舂��n?�tY ?13�P�UX�@'p? ����?'V�xu R����=�TWcE�}&^,@?��?J��裉?*Б�z�宵m������]?���??9���}�T?j��楮��髋B耋�=金{]д��慈?7KF{P��E�Y?�U�R??�z�C??�F�?yZ?��A苏n(hZ⒌G�D��3!��z倒��b务? TnGM喇�|�a�v��?]苟��Ih$�ymFb?'~剐枧 ?��烘?�Vk闽咔7�i� F2y!拍}?b?��_?�@狲Ea���Z� �$2? �I邪P���B+�d��!S��z?�?a??�睚%��?J7m�M����x2\?�[��m慨?d *�H���$�?H1#��?Wn??�l ?�??���??y���}?&.�W'LT.??| {谯赝�� ?��蘅?�C��6y^�d?:OY��G�E泶��X��X:�M��)Q_��?`J钯?汁�m�X?B?跌?U�Z嫠NI ??汁KE泊eP�@�hI^��粑�K'Q�k��LhZ�{��D?=��L���Bげ搡��W�k�~~8�|�p鹿�,k\���卯E�V�劣�?�l?��?�孔o���<��O?�|,[4S p∶??淞'?��?6d}铑96{�?�O�疽�茕?�q��.j�m0c��c�U�m?_��Nd穿?沫�8ゥ?��\ ^?p�?�z`d>�铍�u塔?gO��M��K��~�,y���}�N��?+��Uh钡�b��圮��@3M<�`'??��.?�Y�j2^走 wU��M赣��,?��??�蠓�9仪�x袤>酹��秣 (?�Y��?��yL �P?�Q�Q1LU@�s��N��`囵啄Z?�p�h�Py劁?)止`Av+?��?HUU_M��??イSS?~膜??=I�V�イ�茚涠��s?�|?�l ?�??�v�g:X?.g蘅��擗=��psM�h[�O�w??@ �h?,i�x�j@ゼ2��m?_??��?[LM0�f*�t??H┞ {?�滠J���Bmh�����猥锹=?%.PI�W饧z��>�Yo�?b�s#��?�jz�H9Y?-�C??-�J�?�� R9.0(i啊kt�T?�qH\:R�`Ww郎W??瀑o�? error

Content of Aquatic Science in our journal

        Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Effect of isolating female from male culture on the culture performance and gonad development of Procambarus clarkii
    HU Qian, WANG Qi-shuai, LIU Xiao-long, LI Yan-he
    HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES    2023, 62 (11): 113-117.   DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.11.020
    Abstract247)      PDF (3107KB)(158)       Save
    In order to explore the effect of Procambarus clarkii culture, the growth, survival, disability and gonad development of Procambarus clarkii were investigated under three culture modes including female mono-sex, male mono-sex and mixed culture. The results showed that there was no significant effect on body weight of Procambarus clarkiiP>0.05) under different aquaculture modes, the survival rate of female mono-sex on the 90th day was the highest (74.17%) and the disability rate was the lowest (5.62%), the average body weight of male crayfish in mixed culture was always higher than that of female crayfish, while the survival rate and disability rate of female crayfish were always higher than those of male crayfish, and the gonad development degree of female crayfish in female mono-sex was higher than that in mixed culture.
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Effects of monthly satiation degree on growth performance, body composition, immunity and water quality of juveniles grass carp
    GUO Wei, WANG Min, YANG Hui-jun, MO Ai-jie, YUAN Yong-chao
    HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES    2023, 62 (11): 106-112.   DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.11.019
    Abstract222)      PDF (1633KB)(102)       Save
    In order to explore the effects of monthly satiation degree on the feeding, growth, immunity of juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) and the water quality index of farmed aquatic fish ponds, juvenile grass carp with body weight of (18.10 ± 0.09) g was selected as the test subjects for a period of 60 days. The juveniles were fed at four levels of 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% of monthly satiation degree. The results showed that: ① The weight gain rate and specific growth rate of the test fish were significantly positively correlated with the monthly satiety, and the treatment group with monthly satiation degree of 100% showed the best specific growth rate (2.02%/d), but had no obvious difference compared with the treatment group with monthly satiation degree of 90% (P>0.05); the feed coefficient of the test fish was significantly negatively correlated with the monthly satiety, the test fish with monthly satiation degree of 90% had the lowest feed coefficient (1.16±0.04), while the test fish with monthly satiation degree of 70% had the highest feed coefficient (1.43±0.07). ② Different monthly satiation degrees had a certain impact on the survival rate and morphological indicators of the test fish, among which the test fish with monthly satiation degree of 100% had the lowest survival rate, but their hepotasomatic index and condition factor were the highest. ③ The difference in the muscle nutrient composition of the test fish under different monthly satiety levels was not significant (P>0.05), while the crude fat content in the whole fish nutrient content was significantly positively correlated with the monthly satiation degree (P<0.05). ④During the test period, the contents of ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen and phosphate in the cultured water bodies increased significantly with the increase of monthly satiety (P<0.05), but the monthly satiety had no significant effect on the nitrogen nitrite nitrogen in the cultured waters and the serum antioxidant index of the test fish (P>0.05).
    Reference | Related Articles | Metrics