湖北农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (10): 54-59.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2018.10.013

• 资源·环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

荆州汛期降水趋势模型研究

邓艳君, 赵卓勋, 张伦瑾   

  1. 湖北省荆州市气象局,湖北 荆州 434020
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-27 出版日期:2018-05-25 发布日期:2019-12-19
  • 作者简介:邓艳君(1988-),女,湖北荆州人,硕士,主要从事3S技术与气象应用研究,(电话)13697300790(电子信箱)570517642@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    荆州市气象局科技基金项目(JZ201605)

Prediction Model of Precipitation Tendency during Flood Season in Jingzhou

DENG Yan-jun, ZHAO Zhuo-xun, ZHANG Lun-jin   

  1. Jingzhou Meteorological Bureau of Hubei Province, Jingzhou 434020, Hubei, China
  • Received:2017-12-27 Online:2018-05-25 Published:2019-12-19

摘要: 利用国家气候中心每月下发的130项气候系统监测指数和荆州站1954-2016年的降水资料,逐一分析这些气候指数与汛期和主汛期降水距平百分率的相关性,选取相关系数>0.3的指数作为预测因子组,采用逐步回归统计法,建立荆州汛期降水预测模型和主汛期降水预测模型。结果表明,荆州汛期和主汛期降水预测模型的相关系数分别为0.874和0.914,均明显大于单个因子的相关性。模型预测2016年汛期和主汛期的降水距平百分率,结果分别为偏多17.3%和偏多223.2%,与汛期降水距平百分率偏多6.2%和主汛期降水距平百分率偏多30.2%相比,汛期降水预测模型预测结果较好,同属于略多的等级,主汛期降水预测模型预测结果虽能预测出偏多的趋势,但数值明显偏大,可能与该模型中预测因子上年11月印度副高强度指数有效数据较少,系数偏大有关,可能需要更多数据来调整该项系数,从而提高预测精度。

关键词: 汛期降水, 气候监测指数, 预测因子, 预测模型

Abstract: The 130 climate system monitoring index issued monthly by the National Climate Center and the precipitation data from 1954 to 2016 recorded by Jingzhou climate station were analyzed to find the correlation coefficient between these climate index and the flood season precipitation anomaly percentage as well as the main flood season precipitation anomaly percentage. Using stepwise regression method, the index with the correlation coefficients larger than 0.3 were chosen as predictor group to establish the Jingzhou precipitation forecast models of flood season and main flood season. The statistical results showed that the correlation coefficients of precipitation forecast models of flood season and main flood season were 0.874 and 0.914 respectively, which were significantly higher than the coefficients of single factor. The flood season and main flood season precipitation anomaly percentages of Jingzhou in 2016 were forecasted to be more than the normal 17.3% and 223.2% with those models. Comparing to the actual value of more than 6.2% and 30.2%, the flood season model gave better forecasting result and the main flood season model gave same trend but too large value. The large forecasting error of main flood season model may be related to the shortage of effective data of last November India subtropical high pressure zone index and larger coefficient. More data was needed to tune the relevant coefficient to improve the forecasting accuracy.

Key words: flood season precipitation, climatic monitoring index, predictive factors, prediction model

中图分类号: