湖北农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (20): 214-219.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2019.20.051

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GIS的武陵山区旅游扶贫绩效空间差异分析—以湖南省37个县市为例

唐业喜a, 周盛芳a, 李智辉a, 李逸舒a, 陈其红b, 邓明蓉a   

  1. 吉首大学,a.土木工程与建筑学院; b.旅游与管理工程学院,湖南 张家界 427000
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-23 出版日期:2019-10-25 发布日期:2019-11-19
  • 作者简介:唐业喜(1989-),男,湖南津市人,助教,硕士,主要从事资源与产业经济研究,(电话)15174481235(电子信箱)15174481235@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然与文化遗产研究基地2018年开放项目(18JDZB054); 大鲵资源保护与综合利用湖南省工程实验室2017年基金项目(DNGC1707); 吉首大学2018年大学生研究性和创新性实验计划项目(JDCX2018089)

Spatial difference analysis of tourism poverty alleviation performance GIS in Wuling Mountain area:Taking 37 counties and cities in Hunan province as an example

TANG Ye-xia, ZHOU Sheng-fanga, LI Zhi-huia, LI Yi-shua, CHEN Qi-hongb, DENG Ming-ronga   

  1. a.School of Civil Engineering and Architecture; b.College of Tourism and Management Engineering,Jishou University,Zhangjiajie 427000,Hunan,China
  • Received:2018-10-23 Online:2019-10-25 Published:2019-11-19

摘要: 基于湖南省武陵山区2017年的面板数据,结合旅游扶贫的内涵,构建包含经济、社会、生态、贫困绩效4个维度的评价指标体系,分别运用AHP法、标准值加权求和法确定指标权重及最终扶贫绩效值,对37个县域的旅游扶贫绩效空间差异及存在问题进行分析。结果表明,湖南省武陵山区整体旅游扶贫绩效不佳,中等绩效以上的县域22个,占比59.46%,较低绩效以下的县域仍占比40.54%;各县域绩效差异较明显,空间上大体呈现出南北绩效较好、中部绩效一般的分布态势;指标维度绩效差异性较大,经济绩效和贫困绩效对综合绩效贡献较大,而社会绩效和生态绩效贡献较小。

关键词: 旅游扶贫, 绩效, 空间差异, GIS, 武陵山区

Abstract: Based on the panel data of Wuling Mountain district in Hunan province in 2017, combined with the connotation of tourism poverty alleviation, an evaluation index system consisting of four dimensions of economic, social, ecological and poverty performance is constructed, The AHP method and the standard value weighted summation method are used to determine the indicator weight and the final poverty alleviation performance value so as to analyze the spatial differences and existing problems of tourism poverty alleviation performance in 37 counties. The results show that the overall tourism poverty alleviation performance in Wuling Mountain, Hunan is not good, 22 counties with medium performance above, accounting for 59.46%, and the county below lower performance still accounts for 40.54%; the performance difference of each county is obvious, and the space is generally presented. Spatially, the distribution performance of North-South performance is good, and the performance of Central China is generally; the performance of indicator dimension is different, economic performance and poverty performance contribute a lot to comprehensive performance, while social performance and ecological performance contribute less.

Key words: tourism poverty alleviation, performance, spatial differences, GIS, Wuling Mountain

中图分类号: