小龙虾养殖水体氮磷污染问题的对策研究

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.12.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 虾稻模式具有良好经济效益,而养殖水体必须用湿地植物高效净化氮磷。借鉴了农作物高效吸收利用氮磷的根系表型特点,综述了湿地植物表型可塑性、根系结构、生理功能以及已有去除水体氮磷研究进展。提出了人工调整湿地植物物候期,不同环境条件诱导其具有高效吸收氮磷的根系表型可塑性,以便适用于小龙虾（Procambarus clarkii）养殖水体的关键处理时期,合理搭配物种组合构建人工浮岛。

关键词: 小龙虾（Procambarus clarkii）, 富营养化, 生态净化, 湿地植物, 表型可塑性, 生理生态特征

Abstract: Procambarus clarkii-rice model has good economic benefits. Aquaculture water of Procambarus clarkii must use wetland plants to effectively purify nitrogen and phosphorus. In this paper, referenced the phenotypic characteristics of the crops root system for the efficient absorption and utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus, and summarized the phenotypic plasticity, root structure and physiological function of wetland plants, as well as the research progress of removed nitrogen and phosphorus in water. It is suggested that adjusted the phenology of wetland plants, induced the roots phenotypic plasticity with efficiently absorption and utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus under the different concentrations, to suite the critical treatment period of Procambarus clarkii aquaculture water. and construct the artificial floating island by reasonable combination of species.

Key words: Procambarus clarkii, eutrophication, ecological purification, wetland plant, phenotypic plasticity, ecophysiological features

中图分类号:

X824

张霞, 汪婷, 魏红波, 周存宇, 杨代勤, 李俊凯, 杨朝东. 小龙虾养殖水体氮磷污染问题的对策研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(12): 113-118.

ZHANG Xia, WANG Ting, WEI Hong-bo, ZHOU Cun-yu, YANG Dai-qin, LI Jun-kai, YANG Chao-dong. Study on the countermeasures of controlling nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in the aquaculture water of Procambarus clarkii[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 60(12): 113-118.

参考文献

[1] 苏文霞. 小龙虾稻田种养模式与技术研究[J]. 农家致富顾问, 2017(14): 60.
[2] 毛栽华, 丁凤琴, 周洵, 等. 克氏原螯虾稻虾连作水质稳定性的研究[J]. 中国水产, 2015(5): 80-81.
[3] 唐尧, 蒋坤桓, 翁建江. 实战派之小龙虾养殖技术系列三:虾蟹池塘亚盐产生、危害和防治,以及pH值传递的信息[J]. 当代水产, 2017, 42(6):82-83, 86.
[4] 翁建江, 吴承玲, 陈以强. 实战派之小龙虾养殖技术系列一:小龙虾养殖准备工作,及3月份池塘常见问题[J]. 当代水产, 2017, 42(4): 90-91.
[5] 沈建筑, 李潇轩, 李志辉, 等. 浅析淡水养殖尾水处理技术及达标排放措施[J]. 水产养殖, 2019, 40(5): 37-39.
[6] 郑杰. 城市湖泊清淤工程的探讨[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2010(9): 3-47.
[7] STENSTROM-KHALILI M I, HAKANSON L. Variations and spurious correlations related to DIN, DIP, TN, TP, DIN/DIP and TN/TP in lakes, rivers, and marine systems[J]. The open marine biology journal, 2009, 3(1): 28-35.
[8] PENG W T, ZOU L, WANG J, et al. Studies on effects of several wetland plants on eutrophic water purification[J]. Advanced materials research, 2011, 356-360: 1180-1188.
[9] YANG J, QI Y, LI H, et al.Comparison of nitrogen and phosphorus purification effects of different wetland plants on eutrophic water[J]. Iop conference, 2018, 113(1): 012042.
[10] BAI X, ZHU X, JIANG H, et al.Purification effect of sequential constructed wetland for the polluted water in urban river[J]. Water, 2020, 12: 1054.
[11] XING W, HAN Y, GUO Z, et al.Quantitative study on redistribution of nitrogen and phosphorus by wetland plants under different water quality conditions[J]. Environmental pollution, 2020, 261: 114086.
[12] 吴振斌. 水生植物与水体生态修复[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2011.
[13] 朱晓荣, 沈全华, 褚秋芬, 等. 潜流湿地技术在高密度养殖尾水处理中的应用[J]. 水产养殖, 2012, 33(10): 17-23.
[14] 陈桂顶. 水培蔬菜系统对农村生活污水尾水中氮磷去除及资源化利用研究[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2015.
[15] PAEZ-GARCIA A, MOTES C M, SCHEIBLE W R, et al.Root traits and phenotyping strategies for plant improvement[J]. Plants, 2015, 4(2): 334-355.
[16] LYNCH J P.Roots of the second green revolution[J]. Australian Journal of botany, 2007, 55: 493-512.
[17] LYNCH J P.Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture:An underexploited opportunity for global agriculture[J]. New phytologist, 2019, 223.
[18] WHITE P J.Root traits benefitting crop production in environments with limited water and nutrient availability[J]. Annals of botany, 2019, 124: 883-890.
[19] 汤显强, 李金中, 李学菊, 等. 7种水生植物对富营养化水体中氮磷去除效果的比较研究[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2007(2): 8-14.
[20] 金树权, 周金波, 朱晓丽, 等. 10种水生植物的氮磷吸收和水质净化能力比较研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(8):1571-1575.
[21] 马旻, 朱昌雄, 梁浩亮, 等. 几种植物对水产养殖废水的修复效果[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(1): 18-22.
[22] 周玥, 韩玉国, 张梦, 等. 4种不同生活型湿地植物对富营养化水体的净化效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10): 3353-3360.
[23] 王良芬, 吴献花, 刘东辉, 等. 水葫芦圈养对星云湖富营养化水体水质的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(2): 952-958.
[24] 李婷, 杨恒, 潘远智, 等. 五种湿地植物组合对城市污水净化效果的模拟研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2019(1): 107-113.
[25] 张震, 刘伸伸, 胡宏祥, 等. 3种湿地植物对农田沟渠水体氮、磷的消减作用[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(1):91-98.
[26] COLMER T D, GIBBERD M R, WIENGWEERA A, et al.The barrier to radial oxygen loss from roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) is induced by growth in stagnant solutions[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 1998, 49: 1431-1436.
[27] ARMSTRONG J, JONES R E, ARMSTRONG W.Rhizome phyllosphere oxygenation in Phragmites and other species in relation to redox potential, convective gas flow, submergence and aeration pathways[J]. New phytologist, 2006, 172: 719-731.
[28] SOUKUP A, ARMSTRONG W, SCHREIBER L, et al.Apoplastic barriers to radial oxygen loss and solute penetration:a chemical and functional comparison of the exodermis of two wetland species, Phragmites australis and Glyceria maxima[J]. New phytologist, 2007, 173: 264-278.
[29] 杨朝东, 张霞, 刘国锋, 等. 植物根中质外体屏障结构和生理功能研究进展[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(1): 114-119.
[30] RANATHUNGE K, LIN J, STEUDLE E, et al.Stagnant deoxygenated growth enhances root suberization and lignifications but differentially affects water and NaCl permeabilities in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots[J]. Plant, cell and environment, 2011, 34(8): 1223-1240.
[31] SHIONO K, OGAWA S, YAMAZAKI S, et al.Contrasting dynamics of radial O₂-loss barrier induction and aerenchyma formation in rice roots of two lengths[J]. Annals of botany, 2011, 107(1): 89-99.
[32] DONG S, ZHANG J, ZHA T, et al.Increased plant density with reduced nitrogen input can improve nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat while maintaining grain yield[J]. Archives of agronogy and soil sceience,2019,66(12):1707-1720.
[33] JIA X, LIU P, LYNCH J P.Greater lateral root branching density in maize improves phosphorus acquisition from low phosphorus soil[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2018, 69:4961-4790.
[34] SUN B, GAO Y, LYNCH J P.Large crown root number improves topsoil foraging and phosphorus acquisition[J]. Plant physiology, 2018:00234.
[35] 朱德峰, 林贤青, 曹卫星. 超高产水稻品种的根系分布特点[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2000(4): 5-8.
[36] YANG C D, YANG X, ZHANG X, et al.Anatomical structures of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) suggest it is well adapted to the aquatic-terrestrial transition zone[J]. Flora, 2019b, 253: 27-34.
[37] YANG C D, ZHANG X, WANG T, et al.Phenotypic plasticity in the structure of fine adventitious Metasequoia glyptostroboides roots allows adaptation to aquatic and terrestrial environments[J]. Plants, 2019c, 8(11): 501.
[38] 夏军. 植物表型可塑性[EB/OL]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ f568d128 ed630b1 c59eeb58c.html.
[39] 赫丁轩, 李肖夏, 郭友好. 水深梯度对钝脊眼子菜生长和繁殖的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2019, 39(5): 794-801.
[40] 王姝, 周道玮. 植物表型可塑性研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24): 8161-8169.
[41] 邹元春, 吕宪国, 姜明. 湿地克隆植物根茎对变境适应的表型可塑性[J]. 湿地科学, 2007, 5(4): 305-310.
[42] STEFFENS B, RASMUSSEN A.The physiology of adventitious roots[J]. Plant physiology, 2016, 170: 603-617.
[43] 罗良国, 陈崇娟, 赵天成, 等. 植物修复农田退水氮、磷污染研究进展[J]. 农业环境与发展, 2016, 33(1): 1-9.
[44] 纪晟莹, 陈友德, 向延平, 等. 湿地植物在农业面源污染防治中的应用研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(5): 113-117.
[45] ENSTONE D E, PETERSON C A, MA F.Root endodermis and exodermis:Structure, function, and responses to the environment[J]. Journal of plant growth regulation, 2003, 21: 335-351.
[46] YANG C D, ZHANG X, ZHOU C, et al.Root and stem anatomy and histochemistry of four grasses from the Jianghan Floodplain along the Yangtze River, China[J]. Flora, 2011, 206(7): 653-661.
[47] ZHANG X, HU L, YANG C D, et al.Structural features of Phalaris arundinacea L. in the Jianghan floodplain of the Yangtze River, China[J]. Flora, 2017, 229:100-106.
[48] ZHANG X,YANG C D, SEAGO Jr J L. Anatomical and histochemical traits of roots and stems of Artemisia lavandulaefolia and A. selengensis (Asteraceae) in the Jianghan floodplain, China[J]. Flora, 2018, 239: 87-97.
[49] KRISHNAMURTHY P, RANATHUNGE K, FRANKE R, et al.The role of apoplastic transport barriers in salt tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Planta, 2009, 230(1): 119-134.
[50] PAULUZZI G, DIVOL F, PUIG J, et al.Surfing along the root ground tissue gene network[J]. Development biology, 2012, 365: 14-22.
[51] WATANABE H, SAIGUSA M, MORITA S.Identification of Casparian bands in the mesocotyl and lower internodes of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings using fluorescence microscopy[J]. Plant Production science, 2006, 9(4): 390-394.
[52] BUSCHHAUS C, JETTER R.Composition differences between epicuticular and intracuticular wax substructures:How do plants seal their epidermal surfaces[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2011, 62(3): 841-853.
[53] MEYER C J, PETERSON C A.Casparian bands occur in the periderm of Pelargonium hortorum stem and root[J]. Annals of botany, 2011, 107(4): 591-598.
[54] YANG C D, ZHANG X, SEAGO Jr J L, et al. Anatomical and histochemical features of Brasenia schreberi (Cabombaceae) shoots[J]. Flora, 2020, 263: 151524.
[55] PECKOVÁ E, TYLOVÁ E, SOUKUP A.Tracing root permeability:Comparison of tracer methods[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2016, 60(4): 695-705.
[56] 杨朝东, 张霞. 双穗雀稗(Paspalum distichum) 通透性生理和茎解剖结构补充研究[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(5): 564-568.
[57] BAÑUELOS G S, FAKRA S C, WALSE S S, et al. Selenium accumulation, distribution, and speciation in spineless prickly pear cactus:A drought-and salt-tolerant, selenium-enriched nutraceutical fruit crop for biofortified foods[J]. Plant physiology, 2011, 155: 315-327.
[58] KOPITTKE P M, WANG P, LOMBI E, et al.Synchrotron-based X-ray approaches for examining toxic trace metal(loid)s in soil-plant systems[J]. Journal of environment quality, 2017, 46:1175-1189.
[59] ENT A V D, PRZYBYOWICZ W J, JONGE M D D, et al. X-ray elemental mapping techniques for elucidating the ecophysiology of hyperaccumulator plants[J]. New phytologist, 2018, 218: 432-452.
[60] ENT A V D, MALAISSE F, ERSKINE P D, et al. Abnormal concentrations of Cu-Co in Haumaniastrum katangense, Haumaniastrum robertii and Aeolanthus biformifolius:Contamination or hyperaccumulation?[J]. Metallomics, 2019, 11(1):586-596.
[61] 邓泓, 叶志鸿, 黄铭洪. 湿地植物根系泌氧的特征[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 24(6): 69-76.
[62] JORGENSON K D, LEE P F, KANAVILLIL N.Ecological relationships of wild rice, Zizania spp. 11. Electron microscopy study of iron plaques on the roots of northern wild rice (Zizania palustris)[J]. Botany, 2013, 91(3): 189-201.
[63] WU C, YE Z, LI H, et al.Do radial oxygen loss and external aeration affect iron plaque formation and arsenic accumulation and speciation in rice?[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2012, 63(8): 2961-2970.
[64] 谭淑端, 张守君, 张克荣, 等. 长期深淹对三峡库区三种草本植物的恢复生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2009, 27(4): 391-396.
[65] 王建超,朱波,汪涛. 三峡库区典型消落带淹水后草本植被的自然恢复特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(5): 603-610.
[66] FROST-CHRISTENSEN H, JRGENSEN L B, FLOTO F.Species specificity of resistance to oxygen diffusion in thin cuticular membranes from amphibious plants[J]. Plant cell and environment, 2003, 26(4): 561-569.
[67] PLACHNO B J, FABER J, JANKUN A, Cuticular discontinuities in glandular hairs of Genlisea St.-Hil. in relation to their functions[J]. Acta botany gallica:Botany letter, 2005, 152: 125-130.
[68] VAN V H, SASIDHARAN R.Shape shifting by amphibious plants in dynamic hydrological niches[J]. New phytologist, 2019,229(1):79-84.
[69] 张霞, 刘志雄, 袁龙义, 等. 武陵山区莼菜减产原因调查和改进措施探讨[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(10): 45-50.
[70] YANG C D, ZHANG X, ZHANG F, et al.Structure and ion physiology of Brasenia schreberi mucilage hairs in vivo[J]. PEERJ, 2019a, 7: e7288.
[71] CHOW M F, SANTHIRAN V, HARIS H.Investigation of the effectiveness of water hyacinth as floating wetland plant on treating the nutrient pollutants[J]. AIP conference proceedings, 2019, 2129(1): 020028.
[72] 张志勇, 刘海琴, 严少华, 等. 水葫芦去除不同富营养化水体中氮、磷能力的比较[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(5): 1039-1046.
[73] 蔡佩英, 刘爱琴, 侯晓龙. 9种水生植物对模拟污水中氮、磷的生物净化效果[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 39(3): 313-318.
[74] 徐秀玲, 陆欣欣, 雷先德, 等. 不同水生植物对富营养化水体中氮磷去除效果的比较[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2012, 30(1): 8-14.
[75] 赵凤亮. 高效净化富营养化水体能源植物的筛选及其生理生态基础[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2012.
[76] 刘燕, 万福绪, 王瀚起. 不同水生植物对富营养化水体氮磷的去除效果[J]. 林业科技开发, 2013, 27(3): 72-75.
[77] 苏小红, 王文国, 顾新娇, 等. 高氨氮对湿地植物污水净化效果的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2014, 32(1): 29-32.
[78] 谢静, 吕锡武, 李洁. 6种湿地植物吸收污水中氮和磷的动力学[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(8): 4067-4072.
[79] 赵妍, 王旭和, 戚继忠. 十九种植物净化生活污水总氮及总磷能力的比较[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(17): 81-84.
[80] 徐蕾, 陈思宇, 谢东升, 等. 乡土水生植物对富营养化水体的净化效果研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2019, 27(6): 642-648.
[81] 熊缨, 苏志刚, 高举明. 不同挺水植物在生活污水中生长量及去污能力比较研究[J]. 环境研究与监测, 2010(3): 12-15.
[82] 张水丽, 范立维, 陈嫩清, 等. 人工湿地净化造纸废水尾水及优势植物筛选[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(9): 3718-3724.
[83] 戢小梅, 许林, 谢焰锋, 等. 水生植物对N、P的富集作用研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015(2): 371-376.
[84] 陈秋夏, 郑坚, 金川. 水生植物对N、P的富集作用研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2008, 30(3): 437-442.
[85] DARAVATH V, CHANDER S, SAGAR D.Impact of elevated carbon dioxide on the protective enzymes in brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) and infested rice (Oryza sativa) plants[J]. Indian journal of agricultural sciences, 2018, 88(9): 1366-1370.
[86] 原向阳,郭平毅,张丽光, 等. 干旱胁迫下草甘膦对抗草甘膦大豆幼苗保护酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3): 698-705.