湖北农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 224-229.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.03.035

• 气象·气候 • 上一篇    下一篇

冬小麦-夏玉米农业气象自动化观测技术评估

张志红1,2, 史桂芬1,3, 李书岭4   

  1. 1.中国气象局河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点开放实验室,郑州 450003;
    2.河南省气象科学研究所,郑州 450003;
    3.河南省气候中心,郑州 450003;
    4.郑州市气象局,郑州 450003
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-04-20
  • 作者简介:张志红(1972-),女,河南郑州人,高级工程师,本科,主要从事农业气象业务、服务和科研工作,(电话)13523070958(电子信箱) 719361993@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国气象局·河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点实验室开放基金项目(AMF202101)

Evaluation of automatic observation technology for agricultural meteorology of winter wheat and summer corn

ZHANG Zhi-hong1,2, SHI Gui-fen1,3, LI Shu-ling4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Agro-meteorological Safeguard and Applied Technique in Henan Province, China Meteorological Administration, Zhengzhou 450003,China;
    2. Henan Institute of Meteorological Science, Zhengzhou 450003, China;
    3. Henan Climate Center, Zhengzhou 450003,China;
    4. Zhengzhou Meteorological Bureau, Zhengzhou 450003,China
  • Received:2023-02-15 Published:2023-04-20

摘要: 2016—2020年在河南省郑州、鹤壁、黄泛区3个国家一级农业气象试验站,利用航天新气象科技有限公司、河南中原光电测控技术有限公司2个厂家5套观测设备,对冬小麦-夏玉米的发育期、冠层高度、密度、叶面积指数、干物质质量等进行连续自动化观测试验,并同时开展人工对比观测。结果表明,冬小麦发育期自动观测误差大都在4 d以内,返青、拔节误差在5 d以上,需辅以人工观测;冠层高度自动观测平均误差多在10 cm以下;生育期内密度波动较大,自动化观测效果较差。夏玉米发育期自动化观测误差大都在4 d以下,拔节、乳熟和成熟暂需辅以人工观测;密度、冠层高度自动观测效果较好。冬小麦和夏玉米发育期、生长状况评定、冠层高度及玉米密度自动观测效果较好,优化后可业务推广应用;而叶面积指数、干物质质量识别效果较差,尚不具备业务推广条件,需改进算法或识别技术。

关键词: 冬小麦, 夏玉米, 农业气象, 自动化观测, 评估

Abstract: In three national first-class agricultural meteorological observation test stations in Zhengzhou, Hebi and Huangfan district of Henan Province, 5 sets of observation equipment of Aerospace New Meteorological Technology Co., Ltd. and Henan Zhongyuan Optoelectronics Measurement and Control Technology Co., Ltd. were used to conduce continuous automatic observation experiments on the growth period, canopy height, density, leaf area index and dry matter of winter wheat and summer corn from 2016 to 2020, and at the same time, manual comparative observation was carried out. The results showed that the identification error of winter wheat in the growth period was usually within 4 days. The error in turning green and jointing period was more than 5 days, which should be supplemented by artificial observation. The average error of canopy height identification was less than 10 cm. The density fluctuated greatly during the growth period, and the effect of automatic identification was poor. The identification error of summer corn in the growth period was generally less than 4 days, and artificial observation was temporarily needed to assist in jointing, milk-ripening and ripening stages. The identification effect of the density and height was good. The identification effects on growth period, growth evaluation, canopy height and corn density of winter wheat and summer corn were good, which could be popularized and applied after optimization. However,the identification effect of the leaf area index and dry matter quality was poor, so there were no conditions for business promotion, and the algorithm or recognition technology should be improved.

Key words: winter wheat, summer corn, agricultural meteorological, automated observation, assessment

中图分类号: