添加糖蜜与预处理对油菜秸秆微贮饲料品质的影响

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.02.021

湖北农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (2): 138-143.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.02.021

添加糖蜜与预处理对油菜秸秆微贮饲料品质的影响

王砚¹, 刘恒恒¹, 伍玉鹏¹, 刘兵², 张艳艳², 徐志宇³

1.华中农业大学资源与环境学院,武汉 430070;
2.荆门市科牧牛业有限公司,湖北荆门 448000;
3.农业农村部农业生态与资源保护总站,北京 100125

收稿日期:2024-02-29 出版日期:2025-02-25 发布日期:2025-03-07
通讯作者: 伍玉鹏（1985-）,男,云南曲靖人,副教授,主要从事生态环境过程与物质循环研究,（电话）18062414462（电子信箱）wyp19851205@126.com。
作者简介:王砚（1975-）,女,湖北仙桃人,副教授,主要从事固体废物处理与资源化研究,（电话）18971490591（电子信箱）windy@mail.hzau.edu.cn。
基金资助:
湖北省重点研发计划项目（2023BCB042）; 国家现代农业产业技术体系项目（CARS-12）

Effects of molasses addition and pretreatment on forage quality of rape straw micro-storage

WANG Yan¹, LIU Heng-heng¹, WU Yu-peng¹, LIU Bin², ZHANG Yan-yan², XU Zhi-yu³

1. College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
2. Jingmen Kemu Industry Co.,Ltd.,Jingmen 448000, Hubei, China;
3. Agricultural Ecology and Resource Protection Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China

Received:2024-02-29 Published:2025-02-25 Online:2025-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为分析不同水平糖蜜与不同预处理方式对油菜秸秆饲料品质的影响,采用高温蒸煮、好氧预处理和高温蒸煮联合好氧预处理对油菜秸秆进行预处理后,再进行厌氧发酵,期间添加0%、5%和10%的糖蜜,添加比例以鲜重为基础。发酵完成后,分析各处理发酵饲料感官评价和营养品质。结果表明,随着糖蜜添加量从0%增加至10%,高温蒸煮预处理油菜秸秆饲料的粗蛋白质（CP）含量从3.55%上升至7.07%、可溶性糖（WSC）含量从0.56%上升至1.23%、干物质（DM）含量从33.02%下降至30.99%、pH从4.44下降至4.08、酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）和中性洗涤纤维（NDF）含量分别减少14.16%和12.16%;好氧预处理饲料的CP和DM含量均略有上升,WSC含量不升反降,pH从5.38下降至4.02,WSC、ADF和NDF含量分别减少0.46%、7.66%和7.43%;好氧发酵与高温蒸煮联合预处理饲料的CP含量从6.66%上升至11.06%、WSC含量从0.49%上升至0.97%,DM、ADF和NDF含量变化不大。因此,糖蜜添加能有效提高3种不同预处理油菜秸秆微贮饲料品质,糖蜜添加量以10%为宜。

关键词: 油菜秸秆, 微贮, 预处理, 糖蜜添加, 饲料品质

Abstract: Effects of molasses addition （0%, 5% and 10%） and pretreatment （high temperature cooking, aerobic pretreatment and high temperature cooking combined with aerobic pretreatment） on forage quality of rape straw micro-storage were analyzed. The results showed that within the high-temperature cooking pretreatment, the CP and WSC content of ensiled rape straw feed increased from 3.55% to 7.07% and 0.56% to 1.23% respectively, with the increase of molasses addition. DM content decreased from 33.02%, and pH declined from 4.44 to 4.08. While ADF and NDF content decreased by 14.16% and 12.16% respectively, with the increase of molasses addition. Within the aerobic pretreatment, the CP and DM contents of ensiled rape straw feed increased slightly with the increase of molasses addition, while pH declinced from 5.38 to 4.02, and WSC, ADF and NDF content decreased by 0.46%, 7.66% and 7.43%, respectively. Within the combination of high temperature cooking and aerobic pretreatment, the CP and WSC contents of ensiled rape straw feed increased from 6.66% to 11.06% and 0.49% to 0.97% respectively, with the increasing of molasses addition. While non-significant change was detected for DM, ADF and NDF contents. Therefore, the addition of molasses could effectively improve the fermentation quality of rape straw micro-storage, no matter what kinds of pretreatment adopted. In addition, the optimal amount of molasses addition was 10% based on the fresh amount of rape straw.

Key words: rape straw, micro-storage, pretreatment, molasses addition, forage quality

中图分类号:

S816.53

王砚, 刘恒恒, 伍玉鹏, 刘兵, 张艳艳, 徐志宇. 添加糖蜜与预处理对油菜秸秆微贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(2): 138-143.

WANG Yan, LIU Heng-heng, WU Yu-peng, LIU Bin, ZHANG Yan-yan, XU Zhi-yu. Effects of molasses addition and pretreatment on forage quality of rape straw micro-storage[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2025, 64(2): 138-143.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG Q, ZOU D, ZENG X, et al.Effect of the direct use of biomass in agricultural soil on heavy metals-activation or immobilization[J]. Environmental pollution, 2021, 272: 115989.
[2] 王砚,伍玉鹏,王亦闻,等.前端好氧预处理对油菜秸秆黄贮发酵品质的影响[J].中国饲料,2021(17):116-121.
[3] LI X, TANG W, HE Y.Integrated understanding of acidic deep eutectic solvent choline chloride: Oxalic acid pretreatment to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of rape straw[J]. Industrial crops and products, 2023, 206: 117691.
[4] TIAN J, POURCHER A, BIZE A, et al.Impact of wet aerobic pretreatments on cellulose accessibility and bacterial communities in rape straw[J]. Bioresource technology, 2017, 237: 31-38.
[5] 贾晶霞,梁宝忠,王艳红,等.不同汽爆预处理对干玉米秸秆青贮效果的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(20):192-198.
[6] 张相伦,游伟,赵红波,等.乳酸菌制剂对全株玉米青贮品质及营养成分的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(1):336-342.
[7] 谢华德,李苗苗,靳思玉,等.乳酸菌对低温下玉米秸秆黄贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J].中国饲料,2019(7):33-38.
[8] 伍玉鹏,刘恒恒,胡荣桂,等.不同预处理方式对油菜秸秆微贮饲料品质的影响[J].中国饲料,2022(19):134-139.
[9] 刘冠明,王晓明,吴壮丽.基于主成分分析的青贮玉米品种生产性能的综合评价[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2006,41(3):35-39.
[10] 张晓兵,夏琛,项波卡,等.基于灰色关联分析的云南烟叶化学成分适宜性评价[J].烟草科技,2011(10):32-35.
[11] 韩瑞宏,卢欣石,高桂娟,等.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):142-146.
[12] 庞丹波,李生宝,潘占兵,等.基于主成分分析和隶属函数的紫花苜蓿引种初步评价[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(6):2815-2819.
[13] 刘晶,宋谦,田新会,等.基于隶属函数法和GGE双标图的饲草型小黑麦种质适应性评价[J].草业学报,2018,27(5):85-96.
[14] BORREANI G, TABACCO E, SCHMIDT R, et al.Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages[J]. Journal of dairy science, 2018, 101(5): 3952-3979.
[15] 原现军,王奇,李志华,等.添加糖蜜对青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质及营养价值的影响[J].草业学报,2013,22(3):116-123.
[16] 王坚,王亚琴,闻爱友,等.糖蜜添加对西花茎叶稻秸苜蓿混合青贮发酵品质的影响[J].草业学报,2014,23(3):248-254.
[17] 刘婷婷,张振威,岳春旺,等.添加糖蜜和青贮添加剂对“张杂谷”全株青贮发酵品质的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2017,44(5):1382-1387.
[18] 徐鹏飞,王旭哲,杨寒珺,等.添加糖蜜对棉杆微贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2023,60(3):715-726.
[19] MCDONALD P, HENDERSON A, HERON S.The biochemistry of silage (2nd edition)[M]. Aberystwyth: Cambrian printers ltd, 1991.
[20] 张养东,杨军香,王宗伟,等.青贮饲料理化品质评定研究进展[J].中国畜牧杂志,2016,52(12):37-42.
[21] 李岚捷,成述儒,刁其玉,等.日粮碳水化合物对幼龄反刍动物生长发育的影响[J].畜牧与兽医,2017(12):145-149.
[22] 李向林,张新跃,唐一国,等.日粮中精料和牧草比例对舍饲山羊增重的影响[J].草业学报,2008,17(2):85-91.
[23] 袁英良,唐丹,鲁馨檀,等.饲用油菜与不同秸秆按不同水分含量混贮品质研究[J].中国饲料,2021(15):115-120.
[24] 周娟娟,吴丹,刘洋,等.微贮和氨化处理对西藏主要农作物秸秆饲用品质的影响[J].中国饲料,2023(8):126-129.
[25] 刘海燕,王彦靖,王秀飞,等.不同品种菊芋秸秆黄贮饲料的饲用价值评价[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(11):5321-5328.
[26] 琚泽亮,赵桂琴,覃方锉,等.添加玉米粉和乳酸菌制剂对燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播捆裹青贮发酵品质的影响[J].草原与草坪,2016,36(2):59-65.
[27] 阴法庭,张凤华.饲料油菜与玉米秸秆混合青贮营养品质[J].草业科学,2018,35(7):1790-1796.
[28] 何玉鹏,郭艳丽,秦士贞,等.添加米糠和小麦麸对不同品种马铃薯茎叶青贮品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(10):3311-3318.

添加糖蜜与预处理对油菜秸秆微贮饲料品质的影响

Effects of molasses addition and pretreatment on forage quality of rape straw micro-storage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于德涵, 朱颖怡, 黎莉, 武海玲. 超声辅助有机酸预处理玉米芯复合酶解工艺优化[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(5): 168-174.
[2]	杨秀梅, 张艺萍, 赵阿香, 王丽花, 瞿素萍. 不同保鲜剂组合对非洲菊切花保鲜效果的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(1): 96-101.
[3]	王泽家, 陈炀, 董媛媛. 过氧化氢和氢氧化钙联合预处理对小麦秸秆纤维素、半纤维素、木质素含量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(22): 97-99.
[4]	邓甜, 胡婷, 晏丽. 月季切花简易家用型保鲜条件研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(17): 137-141.
[5]	白祖国, 彭文博, 谢静, 丁邦超, 杨积衡. 预处理与双膜法组合工艺处理农药厂含磷生化尾水研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(12): 72-74.
[6]	吉松毅, 潘志新, 矣勇波, 闫奇, 许江虹, 王浩雅. 造纸法再造烟叶原料预处理工艺及装备研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(22): 178-181.
[7]	童贯和, 罗勋, 刘天骄. 无土栽培基质对四种叶菜类蔬菜某些生理指标的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(21): 113-117.
[8]	程建平, 李进兰, 李阳, 徐得泽, 赵锋, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 费利红, 张璟. 油菜秸秆还田下不同水稻栽培模式对产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(24): 62-65.