湖北农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (6): 247-256.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.06.039

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    

对外开放背景下“一带一路”对乡村振兴的影响

袁元   

  1. 宝鸡文理学院经济管理学院, 陕西 宝鸡 721013
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-10 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-07-18
  • 作者简介:袁 元(1989-),女,陕西西安人,讲师,博士,主要从事“一带一路”农业发展研究,(电子信箱)yuanyuan_2022@snnu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省教育厅软科学一般项目(2020KRM104); 陕西省社会科学基金重点项目(2020D038)

The impact of the “Belt and Road” on rural revitalization under the background of opening-up

YUAN Yuan   

  1. College of Economics and Management, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013,Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2023-10-10 Published:2025-06-25 Online:2025-07-18

摘要: 选择“一带一路”倡议作为对外开放实践案例,探析其与乡村振兴战略的互动关系。基于2010—2021年省级面板数据,采用倾向得分匹配双重差分法(PSM-DID),实证识别“一带一路”对沿线地区经济发展、减贫成效及农村居民收入的影响。结果表明,“一带一路”带动了沿线地区经济增长和农民增收,降低了贫困率,对乡村振兴具有显著正向推动效应,且该效应随时间推移呈逐渐增强的趋势;从区域差异来看,“一带一路”对西部地区的作用比沿海地区更为显著,尤其对民族地区的脱贫带动作用尤为强劲。此外,研究发现,中欧班列的开行能够促进沿线地区经济增长,但对农民增收的作用存在区域异质性,在部分地区不显著。基于“五通”模式进一步研究发现,“一带一路”促进乡村振兴的传导路径主要通过产业优化和提升对外贸易水平来实现,而金融支撑和政策响应路径的作用效果相对较弱。提出了促进“一带一路”倡议与乡村振兴战略有效衔接的政策建议。

关键词: 对外开放, “一带一路”, 乡村振兴, “五通”

Abstract: The “Belt and Road” initiative was selected as a case of opening-up practice to explore the interaction between it and the strategy of rural revitalization. Using the provincial panel data from 2010 to 2021, the PSM-DID method was adopted to empirically identify the impact of the “Belt and Road” on the economic development, poverty reduction effectiveness and rural residents' income of the regions along the route. The results showed that the “Belt and Road” led to economic growth and increased farmers' income in the regions along the route, reduced the poverty rate, and had a significant positive driving effect on rural revitalization. The effect gradually strengthened over time. From the perspective of regional differences, the “Belt and Road” initiative played a more significant role in the western region than in the coastal region, especially the driving poverty alleviation in minority areas. In addition, it was found that the opening of the China-Europe train could promote the economic growth of the regions along the route, but the effect of increasing farmers' income had regional heterogeneity and was not significant in some areas. Based on the “Five-Pronged Approach” model, it was further found that the transmission path of the “Belt and Road” in promoting rural revitalization was mainly realized through industrial optimization and improving the level of foreign trade, while the role of financial support and policy response paths was relatively weak. Finally, policy suggestions for the effective connection between the “Belt and Road” Initiative and the strategy of rural revitalization were put forward.

Key words: opening-up, the “Belt and Road”, rural revitalization, “Five-Pronged Approach”

中图分类号: