湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2): 247-256.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.02.037

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    

乡村振兴促进共同富裕的实践形态与驱动逻辑——基于多案例的类型分析

吴尔, 许佳君, 刘体凤   

  1. 河海大学公共管理学院,南京 211100
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-01 出版日期:2026-03-04 发布日期:2026-03-04
  • 通讯作者: 许佳君(1966-),男,江苏淮安人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事城乡社会学、公共政策与社会管理研究,(电话)13913823229(电子信箱)xujiajun2004@126.com。
  • 作者简介:吴 尔(1991-),男,安徽宿松人,在读博士研究生,研究方向为城乡社会学,(电话)18326922891(电子信箱) 1209874866@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(KYCX22_0695)

Practical forms and driving logic of rural revitalization in promoting common prosperity:A typological analysis based on multiple cases

WU Er, XU Jia-jun, LIU Ti-feng   

  1. School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
  • Received:2025-09-01 Published:2026-03-04 Online:2026-03-04

摘要: 基于制度嵌入与内源式发展理论,构建“政府赋能-内生动力”二维分析框架,依据二者强弱程度差异,识别出乡村振兴促进共同富裕的四种实践类型:产业致富型、人才效率型、文化赋能型、生态公平型,分别对应物质富裕、效率提升、精神富裕与公平促进等维度。结合对典型村庄实践案例的田野调查发现,外部政府赋能与村庄内生动力的组合模式共同塑造了地方实践的差异化路径。进一步地,揭示了各类型实践形态的驱动机制:产业致富型遵循以物质为导向的产业致富逻辑;人才效率型遵循以效率为导向的人才引领逻辑;文化赋能型遵循以精神为导向的文化赋能逻辑;生态公平型则遵循以公平为导向的生态共创逻辑。该整合性的横向比较框架,为系统理解乡村振兴促进共同富裕的多元路径提供了可比较的理论视角和具象化的操作路径。本研究尚存在一定的局限性,未来需进一步完善理论建构,以增强其解释广度与适用性。

关键词: 共同富裕, 乡村振兴, 实践形态, 驱动逻辑, 类型分析

Abstract: Based on institutional embeddedness and endogenous development theories, a two-dimensional analytical framework of “government empowerment-endogenous dynamism” was constructed. By assessing the relative strengths of these two dimensions, four practical models for rural revitalization promoting common prosperity were identified: industry-driven wealth, talent-driven efficiency, culture-driven empowerment, and ecology-driven equity. These corresponded to dimensions of material affluence, efficiency enhancement, spiritual enrichment, and equitable promotion, respectively. Field investigations of typical village practices revealed that combinations of external government empowerment and internal village dynamism jointly shaped differentiated local pathways. Furthermore, this framework elucidated the driving mechanisms of each practice type: Industry-driven wealth followed a material-oriented industrial enrichment logic; talent-driven efficiency adhered to an efficiency-oriented talent-led logic; culture-driven empowerment followed a spirit-oriented cultural empowerment logic; ecology-driven equity adhered to an equity-oriented ecological co-creation logic. This integrated comparative framework provided a comparable theoretical perspective and concrete operational pathways for systematically understanding the diverse paths of rural revitalization promoting common prosperity. This study had certain limitations, and future research should further refine the theoretical framework to enhance its explanatory breadth and applicability.

Key words: common prosperity, rural revitalization, practical forms, driving logic, typological analysis

中图分类号: