榆林市樟子松人工林土壤养分特征

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.01.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为进一步探明陕西省榆林市樟子松人工林的土壤养分变化特征,以5年生樟子松（Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv.）纯林和5年生樟子松-胡枝子（Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.）混交林为研究对象,分析土壤有机质、硝态氮、有效磷、速效钾等理化指标以及土壤酶活性的变化特征。结果表明,樟子松纯林和樟子松-胡枝子混交林土壤有机质、有效磷和速效钾含量整体上均随着土层深度的增加呈下降趋势,全磷含量均随着土层深度的增加呈先升高后降低的趋势,硝态氮含量则均随着土壤深度的增加而增加,5个指标均表现为樟子松-胡枝子混交林高于樟子松纯林,且樟子松-胡枝子混交林各层土壤有效磷含量均显著高于樟子松纯林（P<0.05）;樟子松纯林和樟子松-胡枝子混交林土壤含水率各土层间差异均不显著,樟子松-胡枝子混交林5~15 cm土层土壤含水率含量显著高于樟子松纯林（P<0.05）;樟子松纯林和樟子松-胡枝子混交林土壤碱性磷酸酶活性、过氧化氢酶活性、脲酶活性均随着土层深度的增加而降低,且樟子松-胡枝子混交林过氧化氢酶活性和脲酶活性在各土层均显著高于樟子松纯林（P<0.05）。

关键词: 樟子松（Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv.）, 纯林, 混交林, 土壤理化指标, 酶活性, 榆林市

Abstract: In order to investigate the characteristics of soil nutrient changes of Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv. plantation in Yulin City, Shaanxi Province, a 5-year-old pure plantation and a 5-year-old mixed plantation of P. sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv. were selected as the research objects, and the changes of soil organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, and soil enzyme activity were analyzed. The results showed that the contents of soil organic matter, available phosphorus and available potassium in pure forest of P. sylvestris var. mongolica Litv. （abbreviated as pure forest） and mixed forest of P. sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv. and Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. （abbreviated as mixed forest） decreased with the increase of soil depth, the content of total phosphorus increased first and then decreased with the increase of soil depth, and the content of nitrate nitrogen increased with the increase of soil depth. The five indexes showed that the mixed forest was higher than that of pure forest, and the content of available phosphorus in each layer of mixed forest was significantly higher than that of pure forest （P<0.05）. The soil moisture content between different soil layers was no significant in pure forest and mixed forest, and the soil moisture content of 5~15 cm soil layer in mixed forest was significantly higher than that in pure forest （P<0.05）. The soil alkaline phosphatase activity, catalase activity and urease activity of pure forest and mixed forest decreased with the increase of soil depth, and the catalase activity and urease activity of mixed forest were significantly higher than those of pure forest in each soil layer （P<0.05）.

Key words: Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv., pure forest, mixed forest, soil physical and chemical index, enzyme activity, Yulin City

中图分类号:

白晓霞, 崔洁, 周千强, 齐凯乐. 榆林市樟子松人工林土壤养分特征[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(1): 47-51.

BAI Xiao-xia, CUI Jie, ZHOU Qian-qiang, QI Kai-le. Soil nutrients characteristics of Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv. plantation in Yulin City[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 63(1): 47-51.

参考文献

[1] 王凯,齐悦彤,那恩航,等.基于器官-凋落叶-土壤生态化学计量特征的樟子松和赤松人工林养分利用策略[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(2):274-281.
[2] 张胜男,闫德仁,黄海广,等.不同林龄沙地樟子松人工林土壤微生物群落结构[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2023, 43(1):123-131,143.
[3] 卢慧,吕刚,刘建华,等.辽西北风沙地不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤优先流特征[J].生态环境学报,2022,31(12):2350-2357.
[4] 高翔,周宇,孟平,等.辽西樟子松人工林净生态系统碳交换[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(5):1183-1190.
[5] 柳叶,任悦,高广磊,等.沙地樟子松人工林土壤碳氮磷储量分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(6):27-34.
[6] 于德良,雷泽勇,赵国军,等.土壤酶活性对沙地樟子松人工林衰退的响应[J].环境化学,2019,38(1):97-105.
[7] 宋立宁,朱教君,郑晓.基于沙地樟子松人工林衰退机制的营林方案[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3249-3256.
[8] 郭鑫炜,李志远,秦胜金,等.林农复合对沙地樟子松人工林土壤团聚体、有机碳及微生物生物量碳分配的影响[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3036-3042.
[9] 于东伟,雷泽勇,张岩松,等.沙地樟子松人工林的生长对土壤氮变化的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(6):179-186.
[10] 白晓霞,艾海舰.榆林沙地樟子松人工林土壤养分变化特征[J].西部林业科学,2020,49(3):80-85.
[11] 林雅超,高广磊,丁国栋,等.沙地樟子松人工林土壤理化性质与微生物生物量的动态变化[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(5):1445-1454.
[12] 王学林,高广磊,丁国栋,等.沙地樟子松人工林土壤酶活性研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(1):114-120.
[13] 闫德仁,张胜男,黄海广,等.沙地樟子松人工林土壤养分和酶活性变化研究[J].西部林业科学,2019,48(3):10-15.
[14] 廉泓林,李卫,冯金超,等.科尔沁沙地典型固沙人工林地土壤水分时空特征及其对环境因子的响应[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8256-8265.
[15] 程昊天,孔涛,吕刚,等.不同林龄樟子松人工林根际与非根际土壤生态化学计量特征[J].浙江农林大学学报,2021,38(5):1058-1065.
[16] 王凯,那恩航,张日升,等.不同密度下沙地樟子松碳、氮、磷化学计量及养分重吸收特征[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(2):313-322.
[17] 邓继峰,丁国栋,魏亚伟,等.毛乌素沙地南缘樟子松人工林土壤理化性质差异及其与林分生长的关系[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(8):160-166.
[18] 宋依璇,邓继峰,李景浩,等.辽西北典型人工林地不同坡位土壤养分特征及与林木生长性状的关系[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(3):18-24.
[19] 翟培凤,关家欣,何鹏,等.沿干旱梯度樟子松人工林针叶和枝条非结构性碳水化合物及氮含量的变化[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(6):1518-1524.
[20] 裴艳武,黄来明,李荣磊,等.毛乌素沙地东南缘人工林樟子松根系吸水来源与影响因素[J].土壤学报,2022,59(5):1336-1348.
[21] 曾泽群,雷泽勇,魏晓婷.基于水分变化的沙地樟子松人工林土壤分层特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(12):161-165.
[22] 淑敏,姜涛,王东丽,等.科尔沁沙地不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤生态化学计量特征[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(4):789-795.
[23] 赵珮杉,郭米山,高广磊,等.半干旱-亚湿润干旱沙区樟子松根内真菌群落结构和功能时空动态特征[J].环境科学,2023, 44(1):502-511.
[24] 程昊天,孔涛,吕刚,等.不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤-针叶-微生物生态化学计量及稳态性特征[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(5):887-894.
[25] 郑琳琳,赵琼,曾德慧.林下植被去除对樟子松人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3056-3063.
[26] 于德良,雷泽勇,张岩松,等.沙地樟子松人工林土壤酶活性及其影响因子[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(3):621-629.
[27] 武林辉,耿必苗,王艳杰,等.氮添加对樟子松人工林土壤细菌磷酸酶编码基因丰度的影响[J].生物技术通报,2022,38(11):202-209.