Research progress on city scale and urban efficiency

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2019.16.038

Abstract

Abstract: From the perspective of urban externality theory and growth theory on the inner principle of urban optimal scale and the empirical study of urban scale and urban efficiency, the research progress of urban scale and urban efficiency is reviewed. Empirical studies show that population size, land area, first position degree and Gini coefficient are effective indicators to reflect the size of the city from different aspects; DEA method, energy method and ecological footprint method are often used to measure urban efficiency from economic and ecological perspectives; there is a general "U-shaped" relationship and threshold relationship between urban efficiency and city size. Finally, the shortcomings of the current research results are summarized, and the leading direction of future research is proposed, in order to provide a theoretical reference for the country to adjust the urban development strategy.

Key words: urban optimal scale, urban efficiency, externality theory, urban growth theory

CLC Number:

F293

WANG Tao, HAO Han-zhou. Research progress on city scale and urban efficiency[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 58(16): 165-170.

References

[1] 郑军,金晓雨.中国城市效率与城市规模研究——基于非参数与半参数的实证[J].软科学,2015,29(3):107-110.
[2] PARKINSON M,MEEGAN R,KARECHA J.City size and economic performance:Is bigger better,small more beautiful or middling marvellous[J].European planning studies,2015,23(6):1054-1068.
[3] 万庆,吴传清.六大视角下最优城市规模研究进展与展望[J].区域经济评论,2017(1):107-114.
[4] BRUECKNER J K.Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies[J].International regional science review,2000,23(2):160-171.
[5] 赵可,徐唐奇,张安录.城市用地扩张,规模经济与经济增长质量[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(3):390-401.
[6] 高健. 中国城市规模、效率与经济增长研究[D].济南:山东大学,2016.
[7] ANAS A,ARNOTT R J,SMALL K A.Urban spatial structure[J].Journal of economic literature,1998,36(3):1426-1464.
[8] LEVINE,JONATHAN,GARB,et al. Congestion pricing's conditional promise:Promotion of accessibility or mobility?[J].Transport policy,2002,9(3):179-188.
[9] PALIVOS T,WANG P.Spatial agglomeration and endogenous growth[J].Regional science and urban economics,1996,26(6):645-669.
[10] 段瑞君. 中国城市规模及其影响因素研究——来自284个地级及以上城市的经验证据[J].财经研究,2013(9):82-94.
[11] 蒋涛,沈正平.聚集经济与最优城市规模探讨[J].人文地理,2007,22(6):68-71.
[12] 王俊,李佐军.拥挤效应、经济增长与最优城市规模[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(7):45-51.
[13] 赵曜. 中国城市规模与城市生产效率研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2015.
[14] 席强敏. 城市效率与城市规模关系的实证分析——基于2001~2009年我国城市面板数据[J].经济问题,2012(10):37-41.
[15] 方创琳. 中国城市发展空间格局优化的总体目标与战略重点[J].城市发展研究,2016,23(10):1-9.
[16] 杨孟禹,蔡之兵,张可云.中国城市规模的度量及其空间竞争的来源——基于全球夜间灯光数据的研究[J].财贸经济,2017, 38(3):38-51.
[17] 孟令勇,韩祥铭.县域城市首位度及其城镇体系等级规模结构分析[J].小城镇建设,2010(6):77-81.
[18] 朱顺娟,郑伯红.从基尼系数看中国城市规模分布的区域差异[J].统计与决策,2014(6):127-129.
[19] 王嗣均. 城市效率差异对我国未来城镇化的影响[J].经济地理,1994(1):46-52.
[20] 张军. 基于能值方法和DEA模型的城市生态系统效率分析——以北京为例[J].产业与科技论坛,2017(19):94-96.
[21] 刘畅. 基于生态足迹法的可持续发展测度研究——以上海市2010年为例[J].科学大众(科学教育),2013(4):138-139.
[22] HARDLE W,MAMMEN E.Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits[J].Core discussion papers,1990,21(1990065):1926-1947.
[23] 郭力. 中国城市规模效率与最优规模的生态考量——基于地级市面板数据的分析[J].城市问题,2018(2):11-17,35.
[24] 豆建民,张可.空间依赖性、经济集聚与城市环境污染[J].经济管理,2015(10):12-21.
[25] 刘冰. 中国城市最优规模的实证研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2007.
[26] 赵晓霞,渠爱雪,荀文华,等.城市效率研究进展与展望[J].淮海工学院学报(自然科学版),2012,21(1):74-78.