International scientific and technological cooperation model under the background of innovation-driven and scientific and technological cooperation mode between China and Austria

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.13.041

Abstract

Abstract: Conducting international scientific and technological cooperation is internal need for countries around the world to enhance innovation capability, make up their weaknesses and achieve high-quality development. Combing 2015—2019 global innovation development report, summarizing the global pattern of scientific and technological innovation, the evolution trend of innovation law is as follows： from attaching importance to basic research expansion to scientific and technological innovation performance; from innovation quantity to innovation quality; global innovation shows a multipolar development trend; science and technology integration; innovation chain and industrial chain integration; promoting scientific and technological innovation through international cooperation. In this context, referring to the Pasteur quadrant model and combining with the reality of China's scientific and technological innovation, the international cooperation path of two-way integration of innovation chain and industrial chain is put forward, and the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are proposed taking China-Austria scientific and technological cooperation as an example.

Key words: global innovation index, international scientific and technological cooperation, integration of science and technology, integration of innovation chain and industrial chain, China-Austria scientific and technological cooperation

CLC Number:

G321.5

LIN Xi-yan, CHEN Xiong, XIN Bing-qing, YU Sha, MA Yun-fei. International scientific and technological cooperation model under the background of innovation-driven and scientific and technological cooperation mode between China and Austria[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 59(13): 189-194.

References

[1] 张世专,王大明. 关于实质性国际科技合作的理想模型[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2011(5):597-605.
[2] POSNER M.International trade and technical change[J]. Oxford economic papers-new series,1961,13(3):323-341.
[3] 陈健雄,徐翔. 国际技术合作的动因及其理论解释[J]. 国际经济合作,2009(12):19-23.
[4] HANNA V,WALSH K.Small firm networks:A successful approach to innovation[J]. R&D management,2002,32(3): 201-207.
[5] FIAZ M.An empirical study of university-industry R&D collaboration in China: Implications for technology in society[J]. Technology in society,2013,35(3):191-202.
[6] MARTÍNEZ-ROMÁN J A,GAMERO J,TAMAYO J A. Analysis of innovation in SMEs using an innovative capability-based non-linear model:A study in the province of Seville(Spain)[J]. Technovation,2011,31(9):459-475.
[7] SCHWARTZ M,PEGLOW F,FRITSCH M, et al.What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? ——project-level evidence from Germany[J]. Technovation,2012,32(6):358-369.
[8] 傅利平, 周小明, 罗月丰. 产学研合作创新网络知识溢出的发生机制与影响因素研究[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,15(4):293-297.
[9] LÓPEZ A.Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms[J]. International journal of industrial organization,2008,26(1):113-136.
[10] OKAMURO H,KATO M,HONJO Y.Determinants of R&D cooperation in Japanese start-ups[J]. Research policy,2011,40(5):728-738.
[11] GULATI R.Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation[J]. Strategic management journal,1999,20(5):397-420.
[12] GERYBADZE A,HOMMEL U,REINERS H W,et al.Innovation and international corporate growth[M]. New York,USA:Springer,2010.
[13] BOSCHMA R A.Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J]. Regional studies, 2005, 39(1): 61-74.
[14] 王海花, 王蒙怡. 多维邻近性对我国跨区域产学协同创新的影响:静态与动态双重作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(2): 44-50.
[15] 毛磊, 谢富纪. 多维邻近视角下跨区域协同创新影响因素实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(8): 44-50.
[16] 叶乘伟. 当代国际科技合作模式研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学,2005.
[17] WRIGHT M,CLARYSSEB,LOCKETT A,et al.Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries[J]. Research policy,2008,37(8):1205-1223.
[18] DUTRENIT G,ARZA V.Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organizations and industry: Comparing four Latin American countries[J]. Science & public policy,2010,37(7):541-553.
[19] 王英俊,丁堃. “官产学研”型虚拟研发组织的结构模式及管理对策[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2004,25(4):40-43.
[20] 朱桂龙,彭有福. 产学研合作创新网络组织模式及其运作机制研究[J]. 软科学,2003,17(4):49-52.
[21] 苏敬勤,林海芬. 管理创新研究视角评述及展望[J]. 管理学报,2010,7(9):1343-1349.
[22] LEAVY B.Collaborative innovation as the new imperative- design thinking, value co-creation and the power of “pull”[J]. Strategy & leadership, 2012, 40(2): 25-34.
[23] VAN GILS A,ZWART P.Knowledge acquisition and learning in Dutch and Belgian SMEs:The role of strategic alliances[J]. European management journal,2004,22(6): 685-692.
[24] BUSH V.Science:The endless frontier[M]. Washington:National science foundation,1990.3-6.
[25] 司托克斯D.E. 基础科学与技术创新巴斯德象限[M]. 周春彦,谷春立,译. 北京:科学出版社,1999.
[26] The global innovation index 2019: Creating healthy lives—The future of medical innovation[R]. Ithaca, index 2019: Creating healthy lives—The future of medical innovation[R]. Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva:Word Intellectual Property Organization,2019.
[27] 江晓渭. 奥地利与非欧盟国家科技合作新布局[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望,2014,29(8):15-18.