Measurement of the level of ecology-economy-society coordinated development in resource-based cities：Taking Yan'an City, Shaanxi Province as an example

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.05.034

Abstract

Abstract: Taking Yan'an City as an example, an evaluation system covering ecology-economy-society was constructed, and the entropy weight method, coupling analysis method and obstacle degree analysis method were used to study the coupled development level of the ecology-economy-society system and the main influencing factors in Yan'an City from 2012 to 2021. The results showed that the developmental level of ecology, economy and society in Yan'an City had been continuously improved; the level of coupling of the ecology-economy-society system in Yan'an City was high, but the level of coordination was low and the development was slow; the five basic indicators of annual precipitation, per capita park green space, comprehensive utilization rate of general industrial solid waste, proportion of social fixed asset investment to GDP, and social fixed asset investment were the main constraining factors. Some suggestions were made from three aspects of ecological civilization construction, economic structure transformation and strengthening top-level design to promote the coordinated and efficient development in Yan'an City.

Key words: resource-based city, ecology-economy-society, coordinated development level, obstacle degree, Yan'an City

CLC Number:

F127

LI Li, MENG De-xing. Measurement of the level of ecology-economy-society coordinated development in resource-based cities：Taking Yan'an City, Shaanxi Province as an example[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2023, 62(5): 196-202.

References

[1] GROSSMAN G M,KRUEGER A B.Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement[J].Social science electronic publishing,1991,8(2):223-250.
[2] 陆虹. 中国环境问题与经济发展的关系分析——以大气污染为例[J].财经研究,2000(10):53-59.
[3] ZAIM O, TASKIN F.A Kuznets Curve in environmental efficiency: An application on OECD countries[J]. Environmental and resource economics,2000,17(1):21-36.
[4] PIGOU A C.The economics of welfare[M]. London:Macmillan & Co.,1920.
[5] 诸大建,徐萍.中国政府规模、经济增长与福利[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2010,21(2):107-114.
[6] 杨翠迎,何文炯.社会保障水平与经济发展的适应性关系研究[J].公共管理学报,2004,1(1):79-85,96.
[7] 李茜,胡昊,李名升,等.中国生态文明综合评价及环境、经济与社会协调发展研究[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1444-1454.
[8] 初雪,陈兴鹏,贾卓,等.欠发达地区经济、社会和生态系统的协调发展研究——以甘肃省崇信县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(10):13-18.
[9] 孙艺杰,任志远,郝梦雅,等.黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素——以延安市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3443-3454.
[10] 张慧利,蔡洁,夏显力.水土流失治理效益与生态农业发展的耦合协调性分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(8):162-169.
[11] 李恒吉,逯承鹏,鹿晨昱,等.东北地区城市可持续发展的时空格局演变分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):407-411,419.
[12] 姜晓艳,吴相利.林业资源型城市生态-经济-社会协调发展的定量测度——以黑龙江省伊春市为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(21):8396-8407.
[13] 陈妍,梅林.东北地区资源型城市转型过程中社会——经济——环境协调演化特征[J].地理研究,2018,37(2):307-318.
[14] 李玲蔚,白永平,杨雪荻,等.黄河几字湾地区可持续发展的动态演变及区域差异[J].干旱区地理,2022,45(2):639-649.
[15] 王林钰,陈浩,陈思源,等.城市层面能源-经济-环境-社会耦合协调发展的动态演化与实证分析——以江苏省为例[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(1):51-64.
[16] 张发明,叶金平,完颜晓盼.新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合协调分析——以中部地区为例[J].生态经济,2021,37(4):63-69.