Comparison of nutritional organs medicinal components of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata under two planting models

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.04.029

Abstract

Abstract: Using Alpinia katsumadae Hayata from Eucalyptus forest intercropping and Alpinia katsumadae Hayata from natural growth as research objects, the total flavonoid, polysaccharide, total phenolic, total saponin content and drying rate of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata nutritional organs （roots, stems, leaves） were determined. The results showed that the whole plant drying rate of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata with natural growth was 1.11 times that of Eucalyptus forest intercropping;the total flavonoid content of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata was 10.27~32.13 mg/g, among which Eucalyptus forest intercropping had the highest total flavonoid content in the leaves of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata, reaching 32.13 mg/g;the polysaccharide content of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata was 21.50~37.28 mg/g. Under natural growth conditions, the total polysaccharide content of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata was 1.15 times that of Eucalyptus forest intercropping;the total phenolic content of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata under the condition of Eucalyptus forest intercropping was 2.10 times that of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata under the condition of natural growth;the total saponin content of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata under the condition of Eucalyptus forest intercropping was 1.25 times that of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata under the condition of natural growth;according to principal component analysis, under the condition of Eucalyptus forest intercropping, the comprehensive score and ranking of the nutritional organs of Alpinia Katsumadae Hayata were higher than those of natural growth. In summary, the medicinal component content of the nutritional organs of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata was at a high level under both planting modes, and the Eucalyptus forest intercropping condition was more conducive to the accumulation of effective ingredients of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata.

Key words: Alpinia katsumadae Hayata, Eucalyptus spp. forest, medicinal components, nutritional organs

CLC Number:

S759.82

LUO Dun, WU Tong, LU Su-jun, YU Feng-qiang, LI Ting-yan, YANG Mei, CHEN Zhen-sheng. Comparison of nutritional organs medicinal components of Alpinia katsumadae Hayata under two planting models[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 63(4): 158-162.

References

[1] 胡璇, 王丹, 于福来, 等. 草豆蔻的本草考证[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2020, 26(21): 210-219.
[2] 陈细钦, 冯剑, 詹志来, 等. 经典名方中豆蔻类中药的本草考证[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2022, 28(10): 22-41.
[3] 晏小霞, 王茂媛, 王祝年, 等. 草豆蔻不同部位挥发油化学成分GC-MS分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2013, 34(7): 1389-1394.
[4] JI K L, WU M Z, HUANG C Y, et al, Alpinia hainanensis rhizome extract ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis: Active ingredient investigation and evaluation[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2022, 70(13): 3989-3999.
[5] 曹继钊, 李孝忠. 桉树人工林沃土保育与可持续经营思考[J]. 广西林业科学, 2017, 46(2): 233-236.
[6] 谢耀坚. 中国桉树人工林可持续经营战略初探[J]. 世界林业研究, 2003 (5): 59-64.
[7] 许俊文. 南宁树木园珍贵树种林下种植模式研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2019.
[8] 贤景春, 林镁. 草豆蔻总黄酮提取工艺的优化[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(22): 5158-5160.
[9] 张志军, 刘建华, 李淑芳, 等. 灵芝多糖含量的苯酚硫酸法检测研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2006 (2): 193-195.
[10] 邹晓红, 曹骋, 曾元儿, 等. 不同产地砂仁总酚测定及抗氧化活性比较[J]. 中国现代中药, 2018, 20(7): 811-815.
[11] 李森辉, 董鹏鹏, 戴卫波, 等. 广西不同产地走马胎总三萜的含量测定[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2018, 27(1): 33-36.
[12] 李佳. 吉林敖东提升红参生产折干率项目质量管理改进研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017.
[13] 都晓伟, 刘鸣远. 药材生物学研究是GAP研究的前提和理论基础[J]. 世界科学技术, 2004 (3): 73-76, 89.
[14] 王永明. 实行林下栽培野山参开辟种植人参新途径[J]. 中药研究与信息, 2003(10): 25-27.
[15] 倪天宇, 罗晓朦, 张春椿, 等. 不同生境下多花黄精化学成分比较[J]. 中成药, 2020, 42(11): 2948-2953.
[16] 杜乐乐. 黄蜀葵非药用部位资源化学及生物转化研究[D]. 南京: 南京中医药大学, 2016.
[17] 徐圆圆,周思维, 陈仲, 等. 无患子不同器官中的总皂苷和总黄酮含量[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(4):83-89.
[18] 朱冬雪, 顾采琴, 周伯春. 喜树不同生长发育期及不同器官中黄酮含量的变化[J]. 广东林业科技, 2012, 28(1): 61-64.
[19] 吴静, 胡居吾, 熊伟, 等. 樟树不同器官中多糖抗氧化、免疫调节活性的研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2019,41(4): 804-813.
[20] ZONG A Z, CAO H Z, WANG F S.Anticancer polysaccharides from natural resources: A review of recent research[J]. Carbohydrate polymers,2012, 90(4): 1395-1410.
[21] LIU J, WILLFÖR S, XU C L. A review of bioactive plant polysaccharides: Biological activities, functionalization, and biomedical applications[J]. Bioactive carbohydrates & dietary fibre, 2015, 5(1): 31-61.
[22] 张声祥. 玉竹基因表达分析及其多糖生物合成途径关键酶的研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽中医药大学, 2020.
[23] 杨晓杰, 付学鹏, 李娜. 药用蒲公英不同器官多糖含量的比较[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2011, 22(9): 2228-2229.
[24] 张泽锐, 黄申, 刘京晶, 等. 多花黄精和长梗黄精花主要营养功效成分[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2020, 45(6): 1329-1333.
[25] 梁永富, 易家宁, 王康才, 等. 遮阴对多花黄精生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2019, 44(1): 59-67.
[26] 郭妮. 栽培措施对林下多花黄精产量和品质的影响[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2019.
[27] 付佳, 王洋, 阎秀峰. 萜类化合物的生理生态功能及经济价值[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2003,31(6): 59-62.
[28] SUBRAMANIYAM S, MATHIYALAGAN R, NATARAJAN S, et al.Transcript expression profiling for adventitious roots of Panax ginseng Meyer[J]. Gene, 2014, 546(1): 89-96.
[29] 黄琴, 沈杨霞, 张成静, 等. 铁皮石斛多酚和黄酮含量及与抗氧化活性的相关性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2014, 20(3): 438-442.
[30] 江燕,晁若冰. 黄芪药材中黄芪甲苷和总皂苷含量的比较[J]. 华西药学杂志, 2007, 22(3): 322-324.
[31] 张爱华, 雷锋杰, 许永华, 等. 外源人参皂苷对人参种子萌发和幼根抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 4934-4941.
[32] BENNETT R N, WALLSGROVE R M.Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms[J]. New phytologist, 2010, 127(4): 617-633.
[33] LI Z,WANG Q,RUAN X,et al.Phenolics and plant allelopathy[J]. Molecules, 2010, 15(12): 8933-8952.