The dynamic relationship between urban and rural construction land transformation and rural transformation：Taking Taigu District in Shanxi Province as an example

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.04.038

Abstract

Abstract: Taking Taigu District in Shanxi Province as a research case, an indicator system for evaluating the development level of urban-rural construction land transformation and rural transformation was constructed based on its topography, which was divided into plain area and mountainous area, in order to reveal the spatial and temporal characteristics of urban-rural construction land transformation and rural transformation in Taigu District, and to validate the dynamic relationship between the two in the long term by using the VAR model. The results showed that the comprehensive index of urban and rural construction land transformation and the rural transformation index in the study area showed an upward trend in time and a spatial distribution of high in the west and low in the east. The overall level of urban-rural construction land transformation and rural transformation in the plain region was better than that in the mountainous area. The study area had a long-term equilibrium between urban and rural construction land transformation and rural transformation, and there was a unidirectional causal relationship between urban and rural construction land transformation and rural transformation in the whole of Taigu District and plain area, with rural transformation being the Granger cause of urban and rural construction land transformation, and urban and rural construction land transformation and rural transformation in the mountainous area being the Granger cause of each other. The transformation of urban and rural construction land was affected by its own structural shocks as well as by the transformation of the countryside, and the intensity of the impact of the transformation of the countryside on the transformation of urban and rural construction land was increasing, while the transformation of the countryside was relatively less affected by the transformation of urban and rural construction land and more affected by its own structural shocks. It was recommended that the government should adopt differentiated control strategies for urban and rural construction land expansion in different regions, and promote the coordinated development of urban and rural land transformation and rural transformation in an orderly manner.

Key words: transformation of urban and rural construction land, rural transformation, Taigu District of Shanxi Province

CLC Number:

F301.2:F321.1

YAO Xiao-gang, CHEN Xiao, QIN Ming-xing, KANG Qing. The dynamic relationship between urban and rural construction land transformation and rural transformation：Taking Taigu District in Shanxi Province as an example[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2025, 64(4): 237-246.

References

[1] LIU Y S,LI Y H.Revitalize the world's countryside[J].Nature,2017,548(7667):275-277.
[2] MITCHELL C J A. Creative destruction or creative enhancement? Understanding the transformation of rural spaces[J].Journal of rural studies,2013,32:375-387.
[3] ESPARCIA J.Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects[J]. Journal of rural studies,2014,34:1-14.
[4] LONG H L,LIU Y S,LI X B,et al.Building new countryside in China: A geographical perspective[J].Land use policy,2010,27(2):457-470.
[5] SCOTT K,ROWE F,POLLOCK V.Creating the good life? A wellbeing perspective on cultural value in rural development[J].Journal of rural studies,2018,59:173-182.
[6] 马丽君. 大城市郊区乡村转型与土地利用转型:过程与相关性研究[D].安徽芜湖:安徽师范大学,2020.
[7] 龙花楼,戈大专,王介勇.土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望[J].地理学报,2019,74(12):2547-2559.
[8] LONG H L,QU Y.Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective[J].Land use policy,2018,74:111-120.
[9] 戈大专,王如敏,卢小雪.土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合关系研究——以江苏省县域为例[J].资源科学,2025,47(1):196-210.
[10] 谭林,陈岚.土地利用隐性转型的作用机理及调控路径[J].资源科学,2025,47(1):26-41.
[11] 邹欣怡,赵伟,蒲海霞.三峡库区重庆段土地利用转型及生态服务功能价值时空分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):267-275.
[12] 宋小青,申雅静,王雄,等.耕地利用转型中的生物灾害脆弱性研究[J].地理学报,2020,75(11):2362-2379.
[13] 宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架[J].地理学报,2017,72(3):471-487.
[14] 曲艺,龙花楼.中国耕地利用隐性形态转型的多学科综合研究框架[J].地理学报,2018,73(7):1226-1241.
[15] 瞿诗进,胡守庚,李全峰.中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局[J].地理学报,2020,75(7):1539-1553.
[16] 瞿诗进,胡守庚,童陆亿,等.长江中游经济带城镇建设用地转型的时空特征[J].资源科学,2017,39(2):240-251.
[17] 许凤娇,吕晓,陈昌玲.山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(9):1554-1567.
[18] 屠爽爽,龙花楼,张英男,等.典型村域乡村重构的过程及其驱动因素[J].地理学报,2019,74(2):323-339.
[19] 李升发,李秀彬.中国山区耕地利用边际化表现及其机理[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):803-817.
[20] SMITH A,SNAPP S,CHIKOWO R,et al.Measuring sustainable intensification in smallholder agroecosystems: A review[J].Global food security,2017,12:127-138.
[21] 刘彦随. 新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):637-650.
[22] 杨忍,刘彦随,龙花楼,等.中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望: 逻辑主线与内容框架[J].地理科学进展, 2015,34(8):1019-1030.
[23] 姚艳红. 长沙市城乡建设用地转型特征与协调性研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2019.
[24] 曾于珈. 重庆市巴南区城乡建设用地转型与经济社会发展耦合协调研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2019.
[25] 贺艳华,范曙光,周国华,等.基于主体功能区划的湖南省乡村转型发展评价[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(5):667-676.
[26] 曹苗苗,彭鹏,王贤,等.湖南武陵山片区乡村转型时空演化特征及其影响因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020, 29(9):1930-1940.
[27] 郭向阳,穆学青,丁正山,等.城市生态环境与旅游经济协调效应及动态关系——以曲靖为例[J].经济地理,2020,40(7):231-240.