The evolution process, characteristics and prospect of participating in agricultural land management policy of industrial and commercial capital：A quantitative analysis based on policy documents

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.20.042

Abstract

Abstract: Through a quantitative analysis of 52 policy documents from 2004 to 2022 by Nvivo 12 Plus software, it is found that the participating in agricultural land management policy of the industrial and commercial capital in China has gone through three main stages, and has presented three evolutionary characteristics including the principle of safeguarding the interests of farmers, the change from supporting the large-scale operation to seeking the combination of the large-scale operation and the small-scale peasant economy, and constantly enriching and refining the way of participating in agricultural land management and control of the industrial and commercial capital. The following aspects need to be focused on in the future： how to reasonably control the industrial and commercial capital while encouraging it to the countryside in the process of implementing the rural revitalization strategy, how to ensure the implementation of the relevant policies and measures about the participation in agricultural land management of the industrial and commercial capital, and how to solve the leftover problems of the industrial and commercial capital such as the unfinished projects and the running away with the reasonable policy and measures.

Key words: industrial and commercial capital, agricultural land management, quantitative analysis, policy evolution, characteristics

CLC Number:

F320.2

DU Xing-duan, YANG Xiao-he. The evolution process, characteristics and prospect of participating in agricultural land management policy of industrial and commercial capital：A quantitative analysis based on policy documents[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(20): 228-232.

References

[1] 徐章星,张兵.关于现代农业导向下资本农业发展的思考[J].农业经济,2020(8):3-5.
[2] 穆娜娜,孔祥智. 工商资本下乡种粮的增收机制——基于案例的实证分析[J]. 农业现代化研究. 2017, 38(1): 23-30.
[3] 郭庆海.小农户:属性、类型、经营状态及其与现代农业衔接[J].农业经济问题,2018(6):25-37.
[4] 胡新艳,陈文晖,罗必良.资本下乡如何能够带动农户经营——基于江西省绿能模式的分析[J].农业经济问题,2021(1):69-81.
[5] 陈秧分,刘玉,李裕瑞.中国乡村振兴背景下的农业发展状态与产业兴旺途径[J].地理研究,2019,38(3):632-642.
[6] 姚树荣,周诗雨.乡村振兴的共建共治共享路径研究[J].中国农村经济,2020(2):14-29.
[7] 许悦,陈卫平.资本下乡如何嵌入本地农村社区?——基于117家生态农场的实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(2):69-80.
[8] 高晓燕,赵宏倩.工商资本下乡“非粮化”现象的诱因及长效对策[J].经济问题,2021(3):92-99.
[9] 杨雪锋.资本下乡:为农增利还是与农争利?——基于浙江嵊州S村调查[J].公共行政评论,2017,10(2):67-84,194.
[10] 张义博. 工商资本下乡的用地问题研究[J].宏观经济管理,2019(4):53-59.
[11] 周振. 工商资本参与乡村振兴“跑路烂尾”之谜:基于要素配置的研究视角[J].中国农村观察,2020(2):34-46.
[12] 王家庭,舒居安,赵一帆.中国农村土地流转政策概念、分类及演进特征——基于政策文本的量化分析[J].经济问题,2017(10):96-101.
[13] 于晓华,钟晓萍,张越杰.农村土地政策改革与城乡融合发展——基于中央“一号文件”的政策分析[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2019,59(5):150-162,222-223.
[14] 王宏新,付甜,张文杰.中国易地扶贫搬迁政策的演进特征——基于政策文本量化分析[J].国家行政学院学报,2017(3):48-53,129.
[15] 王海娟. 资本下乡的政治逻辑与治理逻辑[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2015,41(4):47-54.
[16] 朱战辉. 新时期农业经营方式的再小农化[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(5):32-39.
[17] 付会洋,叶敬忠.论小农存在的价值[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,34(1):20-28.
[18] 陈锡文. 从农村改革四十年看乡村振兴战略的提出[J].行政管理改革,2018(4):4-10.
[19] 马彪. 工商资本进入农业的现状、问题及对策[J].中国物价,2020(9):18-21.
[20] 汪婷,费罗成.工商资本下乡的演化历程及其影响效应[J].湖北农业科学,2022,61(7):181-186,191.