Comprehensive evaluation of the effects of organic bran fertilizers on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco in Qingyuan City based on the AHP-entropy weight TOPSIS model

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.06.012

Abstract

Abstract: To clarify the effects of different types of organic bran fertilizers on the yield, quality and economic benefit of flue-cured tobacco in Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, and to screen suitable high-quality organic fertilizer substitution schemes for this region, Yueyan 97 was used as the test variety, and five treatments were set: conventional commercial fertilizer (CK), sesame bran fertilizer (T1), peanut bran fertilizer (T2), rapeseed bran fertilizer (T3) and soybean bran fertilizer (T4). The agronomic traits, economic traits, chemical composition, sensory quality and appearance quality indicators of flue-cured tobacco were systematically determined, and the AHP-entropy weight TOPSIS model was constructed for multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation. The results showed that T1 performed best in plant height and leaf number at the mature stage; T2 had the highest yield of 2 966.19 kg/hm², which was significantly increased by 9.98% compared with CK; T1 achieved the best economic benefit with an output value of 96 611.69 yuan/hm², which was significantly increased by 20.90% compared with CK; the proportion of superior tobacco leaves in T1 was significantly increased by 20.23% compared with CK. In terms of chemical composition, T2 had a higher nicotine content, while T1 exhibited a higher sugar-nicotine ratio. Sensory evaluation indicated that sesame bran fertilizer performed outstandingly in improving the aroma quality and appearance quality of upper leaves as well as the aroma quality and aroma quantity of middle leaves of flue-cured tobacco. According to the comprehensive AHP-entropy weight TOPSIS evaluation results, the ranking of each treatment was T1>T2>T4>CK>T3. In conclusion, sesame bran fertilizer and peanut bran fertilizer could improve the yield, quality and sensory style of flue-cured tobacco in Qingyuan City, among which sesame bran fertilizer had the best comprehensive performance and could be recommended as the preferred organic fertilizer for substituting chemical fertilizer in this tobacco-growing area.

Key words: AHP, entropy weight method, TOPSIS model, organic bran fertilizer, Qingyuan City, flue-cured tobacco, yield and quality, comprehensive evaluation

CLC Number:

S572

LI Hong-xing, CHEN Jun, YAN Zhao, ZHANG Sheng-qiang, WANG Wei, HUANG Jia-jie, SHEN Li-zheng, CAI Yi-xia. Comprehensive evaluation of the effects of organic bran fertilizers on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco in Qingyuan City based on the AHP-entropy weight TOPSIS model[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2026, 65(6): 72-79.

References

[1] 张启明,陈仁霄,管成伟,等.不同有机物料对土壤改良和烤烟产质量的影响[J].土壤,2018,50(5):929-933.
[2] MENG H F, TIAN X, LIU B X, et al.Improving root nitrogen uptake via organic fertilizer substitution enhances yield and efficiency in dryland maize[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(9):2216.
[3] 李迪秦,龚湛武,李玉辉,等.复合生物有机肥对烤烟光合生理特性及土壤微生物的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2017,19(9):109-116.
[4] 杨营月,刘慧,王龙飞,等.不同肥料类型对植烟土壤及烤烟品质的影响研究[J].作物杂志,2022(3):187-193.
[5] 黄瑞寅,杨天乐,吴向,等.广东不同地方晒黄烟物质成分、代谢物与感官质量差异分析[J].西南农业学报,2024,37(11):2414-2423.
[6] 李红星,陈俊,黄凯祥,等.清远烟区不同烤烟品种引进与综合质量评价[J].天津农业科学,2024,30(7):33-38.
[7] 潘义宏,顾毓敏,夏贤仁,等.有机肥与化肥配施对土壤微生物及烟叶品质的影响[J].江西农业学报,2019,31(1):30-36.
[8] TANG Z H, ZHANG Y Y, SHANGGUAN H Y, et al.Urban organic manure application enhances antibiotic resistance gene diversity and potential human pathogen abundance in invasive giant African snails[J]. Journal of environmental sciences, 2025, 158: 610-620.
[9] 苑举民,丁永亮,张启明,等.有机无机肥对烤烟光合特性和烟叶质量的影响[J].广东农业科学,2018,45(4):14-21.
[10] 凌寿军,罗福命,孙曙光,等.连州烟区不同烤烟育苗方式比较试验[J].广东农业科学,2009,36(1):26-28,41.
[11] 杨伟平,罗福命,凌寿军,等.清远(连州)烟区的发展优势及建议[J].广东农业科学,2011,38(21):184-186.
[12] 褚旭,王珂清,魏建荣,等.基于综合赋权法的烤烟烟叶质量评价[J].烟草科技,2019,52(10):28-36.
[13] 谢林波,杨振宇,匡博麟.基于AHP-TOPSIS-耦合协调模型的农业发展水平实证评估[J].湖北农业科学,2024,63(3):97-103.
[14] 张勇刚,任志广,张晓兵,等.基于改进TOPSIS方法的烤烟化学品质综合评价[J].烟草科技,2022,55(10):62-69.
[15] 张明发,张迪,张胜,等.新型生物有机肥对烤烟生长整齐度及生产效益的影响[J].中国农学通报,2025,41(20):91-96.
[16] 宋树成,刘骏洲,马盼盼,等.基于AHP和TOPSIS的近距空中支援作战方案[J].信息化研究,2025,51(4):63-68.
[17] 徐文兵,吴峰,邓小华,等.根区施用不同生物有机肥对烤烟根系生长发育的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2017,38(5):45-49.
[18] CHEN Y X, LV X L, QIN Y M, et al.Effects of different botanical oil meal mixed with cow manure organic fertilizers on soil microbial community and function and tobacco yield and quality[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2023, 14: 1191059.
[19] 周雨,靳志丽,郭峰,等.有机物料对土壤理化性状及烟叶产质量影响定位研究[J].湖南农业科学,2024(9):54-58.
[20] 齐长悦,张玺,李大西,等.芝麻、花生饼肥等量替代化肥对烤烟碳氮代谢及氮素利用率的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2025, 53(12):85-93.
[21] 刘天波,段淑辉,裴晓东,等.有机无机肥配比对烤烟农艺性状、产质量的影响[J].广东农业科学,2016,43(10):28-33.
[22] 代超. 饼肥不同种类和用量与化肥配施对烤烟性状和质量的影响[D].吉林延吉:延边大学,2016.
[23] 刘君仁,何佶弦,张启莉,等.有机肥与甲壳素、芸苔素内酯互作对烤烟上部叶生长和品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2024, 52(22):44-50.
[24] 杨春雷,吕厚劲,饶雄飞,等.不同类型有机肥对楚雪14号茄芯烟叶产量和品质的影响[J].现代农业科技,2023(13):38-45.
[25] 姚忠达,黄一兰,吴克松,等.不同有机肥对烟叶产量和质量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(36):17951-17953.
[26] 时向东,方圆,杨双剑,等.烤烟叶片发育过程中的组织学和细胞学研究[J].烟草科技,2009,42(7):48-52,60.
[27] 严锦申,杨天乐,黄瑞寅,等.不同有机肥与化肥配施对烤烟产质量及香气代谢物的影响[J].作物研究,2025,39(1):29-38.
[28] 万越. 饼肥对烤烟生长及产质量的影响[J].湖南农业科学,2014(6):29-30,34.
[29] 吕文昌. 生物有机肥对植烟土壤状况和烟叶品质的影响[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2022.
[30] 李影. 有机菌肥和生物炭配施对豫中烤烟生长、品质及植烟土壤性质的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2018.
[31] 韦凤杰,丁红营,张东豫,等.有机肥对不同发育时期烤烟叶片类胡萝卜素含量和脂氧合酶(LOX)活性的调控效应[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(14):164-167.
[32] 丁福章,王发鹏,郑登峰,等.发酵饼肥与减少采收次数对烤烟产质量的影响[J].江西农业学报,2011,23(6):43-45.