湖北农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (9): 182-187.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2019.09.041

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    下一篇

农户生活垃圾治理支付意愿及影响因素分析——以山西省临汾市尧都区为例

估海斌, 党国英   

  1. 西南林业大学经济管理学院,昆明 650224
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-08 出版日期:2019-05-10 发布日期:2019-12-05
  • 通讯作者: 党国英,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要从事绿色创新与发展研究,(电子信箱)12836145@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:估海斌(1989-),男,山西临汾人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为农村发展,(电话)18035780806(电子信箱)1194208396@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(16BJL038)

Analysis of farmers' willingness to pay for domestic waste treatment and its influencing factors:A case study of Yaodu district,Linyi city,Shanxi province

GU Hai-bin, DANG Guo-ying   

  1. School of Economics and Management,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming 650224,China
  • Received:2019-01-08 Online:2019-05-10 Published:2019-12-05

摘要: “垃圾围村”现象严重影响了农村居民的生活与环境质量,成为社会主义新农村与美丽中国建设的巨大阻力。采用条件价值评估法(CVM)设计调查问卷,以山西省临汾市尧都区农村居民为调查对象,运用Logistic回归与主成分分析法对农户生活垃圾治理的支付意愿进行实证分析。结果表明,40.35%的农户有主动支付意愿,愿意为生活垃圾治理支付年平均70.47元/户的费用;影响农户支付意愿的因素依次为年龄、健康状况、环保理念宣传、政策监督、文化程度和工作类别,且均与支付意愿正相关,其中年龄和健康状况影响最大,环保理念宣传和政策监督次之,文化程度和工作类别最小。

关键词: 垃圾治理, 支付意愿, 农村, 影响因素

Abstract: The phenomenon of "garbage surrounding villages" has seriously affected the living and environmental quality of rural residents and has become a huge obstacle to the construction of a new socialist countryside and beautiful China. Using conditional value assessment method(CVM) to design the questionnaire, and taking the rural residents in Yaodu district, Linyi city, Shanxi province as the survey objects, Logistic regression and principal component analysis are used to empirically analyze the willingness of farmers to pay for domestic garbage treatment. The results show that 40.35% of the farmers have the willingness to pay, and are willing to pay an annual average of 70.47 yuan/household for the treatment of domestic waste. The factors affecting the willingness of farmers to pay are: age, health condition, propagandizing of environmental protection concept, policy supervision, education level and job category. Among them, age and health condition have the greatest impact, followed by environmental protection propaganda and policy supervision; education and work have the minimum impact.

Key words: garbage management, willingness to pay, rural areas, influencing factors

中图分类号: