山西省黄河流域水环境安全风险评价研究

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.12.007

湖北农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (12): 35-40.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.12.007

山西省黄河流域水环境安全风险评价研究

周璇¹, 侯向英¹, 郭丕斌²

1.中北大学经济与管理学院,太原 030051;
2.太原师范学院,太原 030619

收稿日期:2020-03-19 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-07-19
通讯作者: 侯向英（1995-）,女,山西长治人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为环境经济学、区域经济学,（电话）18735552655（电子信箱）time0355@163.com。
作者简介:周璇（1971-）,女,山西五寨人,副教授,博士,主要从事环境经济学、区域经济学研究,（电话）13485383067（电子信箱）nuceducn0351@sina.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71874119）; 山西省哲学社会科学规划课题（2020YJ119）

Study on risk assessment of water environment safety in the Yellow river basin of Shanxi province

ZHOU Xuan¹, HOU Xiang-ying¹, GUO Pi-bin²

1. School of Economics and Management,North University of China,Taiyuan 030051,China;
2. Taiyuan Normal University,Taiyuan 030619,China

Received:2020-03-19 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-07-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于灾害风险理论和水环境安全概念内涵,利用层次分析法对山西省黄河流域水环境安全风险状况进行了综合评价。结果表明,黄河流经的9个地级市水环境安全风险等级划分为极高、高、中等、低、极低5个层次,在致灾因素的危险属性里,晋城和长治两市分属于极高和高危险等级,朔州市属于中等风险,这主要是由水质恶化所致;在承灾因子的暴露属性里,忻州市和朔州市分属于极高和高暴露等级,晋中市和临汾市则属于中暴露等级,这主要是由水量减少、人口密度增加所致;在承灾因素脆弱属性里,运城市属于极高等级,晋城市和临汾市则属于高脆弱等级,属于中等脆弱性的是吕梁和朔州两市,这主要是由降水减少、人均水资源量不足所致。最后,通过综合分析,发现晋城市的总体风险最高,需要相关部门重点关注。

关键词: 黄河流域, 水环境安全, 风险评价

Abstract: Based on the disaster risk theory and the concept of water environment security, the risk situation of water environment security in the Yellow river basin of Shanxi province was evaluated by AHP. The results showed that the water environment safety risk levels of the nine prefectural-level cities along the Yellow river were divided into five levels：Extremely high, high, medium, low and extremely low, Jincheng city and Changzhi city were classified as very high and high risk, while Shuozhou city was classified as medium risk, mainly due to deterioration of water quality. Xinzhou city and Shuozhou city were classified as very high and high risk, respectively, in the exposure attribute of hazard-bearing factors, Jinzhong city and Linfen city were in the middle, mainly due to reduced water supply and increased population density; Yuncheng city was at the very high level of vulnerability, while Jincheng city and Linfen city were at the high level of vulnerability, among the medium vulnerable were the cities of Lyuliang city and Shuozhou city, mainly due to reduced precipitation and insufficient water resources per capita. Finally, through the comprehensive analysis, it was found that the Jincheng's overall risk was the highest, and the relevant departments needed to focus on.

Key words: Yellow river basin, water environment safety, risk assessment

中图分类号:

X824

周璇, 侯向英, 郭丕斌. 山西省黄河流域水环境安全风险评价研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(12): 35-40.

ZHOU Xuan, HOU Xiang-ying, GUO Pi-bin. Study on risk assessment of water environment safety in the Yellow river basin of Shanxi province[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 60(12): 35-40.

参考文献

[1] 赵桂香,赵彩萍,李新生,等.近47a来山西省气候变化分析[J].干旱区研究,2006,23(3):500-505.
[2] 孙金华,王思如,朱乾德,等.水问题及其治理模式的发展与启示[J].水科学进展,2018,29(5):607-613.
[3] ZHANG Y Y,SHE D X,XIA J,et al.Causal analysis on the specified paroxysmal water pollution incidents in the Huai River Basin,China[J].Environmental engineering and management journal,2014,14(1):139-151.
[4] 胡耘通,何佳楠.水环境审计评价指标体系构建研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(8):13-18.
[5] 王扬祖. 目前我国水环境状况与水污染防治工作重点[A].中国土木工程学会水工分会第四届理事会第一次会议论文集[C].2002.
[6] 张宁宁,粟晓玲,周云哲,等.黄河流域水资源承载力评价[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(8):1759-1770.
[7] 刘卫,王克军,李敬伟,等.黄河(内蒙古段)流域生态风险评价[J].环境与发展,2016,28(2):27-31.
[8] 张士锋,陈俊旭,华东,等.水资源系统风险构成及其评价——以北京市为例[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(11):1855-1863.
[9] 梁缘毅,吕爱锋.中国水资源安全风险评价[J].资源科学,2019,41(4):775-789.
[10] 刘晓晖,王永,董文平,等.流域尺度水环境污染风险评估[J].科技导报,2016,34(7):134-138.
[11] ZHANG X,XU K,ZHANG D.Risk assessment of water resources utilization in Songliao Basin of Northeast China[J]. Environmental earth sciences,2012,67(5):1319-1329.
[12] KAPLAN S,GARRICK B J.On the quantitative definition of risk[J].Risk analysis,1981,1(1):11-27.
[13] 史培军. 三论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报,2002,11(3):1-9.
[14] DILLEY M,CHEN R S,DEICHMANN U,et al.Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis[J].The world bank hazard management unit,2005,20(4):1-145.
[15] VÖRÖSMARTY C J,MCINTYRE P B,GESSNER M O,et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity[J].Nature, 2010,467(7315):555-561.
[16] PLUMMER R,DE LOE R,ARMITAGE D.A systematic review of water vulnerability assessment tools[J].Water resources management,2012,26(15):4327-4346.
[17] 苏金豹,张维,满鑫.盘龙山森林景区生态旅游开发环境分析与对策[J].林业经济,2017(3):42-45.

山西省黄河流域水环境安全风险评价研究

Study on risk assessment of water environment safety in the Yellow river basin of Shanxi province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	荀佳常, 聂聪, 徐栋, 方贺. 基于多源空间数据的市域洪涝灾害风险评价——以山西省临汾市为例[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(8): 189-196.
[2]	孙贵艳, 代云川. 2000—2020年重庆市土地利用变化及景观生态风险评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(7): 38-43.
[3]	吴小阳. 黄河流域旅游产业-人口城镇化-区域经济耦合协调及空间溢出效应研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(7): 190-196.
[4]	冯晨, 孔千慧. 基于LMDI和脱钩模型的黄河流域农业用水驱动因素研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(4): 37-42.
[5]	余飞, 余京, 王佳彬, 徐姝姝, 罗恺, 李瑜, 王宇, 王锐, 张云逸. 重庆南部碳酸盐岩地区耕地土壤镉含量特征与风险评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(3): 40-46.
[6]	石国伟, 李亚松, 刘雅慈, 曹胜伟, 敦宇. 南阳市某畜禽养殖场地下水污染因子识别及风险评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(3): 157-164.
[7]	王蕾, 詹濮源, 郭悦. 黄河流域三生空间耦合协调的时空演化分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(3): 173-181.
[8]	邓素炎, 叶晖, 罗松英, 李秋霞, 李一锋, 洪嘉欣, 梁晓琪, 黄诗涵. 入海排污口处红树林土壤重金属污染评价及来源解析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(7): 41-47.
[9]	王香花, 杨梦佳. 黄河流域农村产业融合发展水平测度及影响因素研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(6): 188-194.
[10]	陈嘉洛, 魏峣, 汪涛. 沱江流域地表水中重金属含量分布及风险评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(5): 76-82.
[11]	蔡紫薇. 黄河流域乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(4): 212-217.
[12]	王宝英, 齐爱云, 王子莎. 黄河流域与长江经济带种植业碳足迹供需平衡对比研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(3): 53-59.
[13]	杨婕琳, 张飞云. 南疆脱贫农户返贫风险评价研究——以和田地区Y乡为例[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(23): 267-272.
[14]	姚晶晶, 吴旋, 李葳, 王明锐, 崔文文, 张惠贤, 易甜. 湖北省某地区不同种植模式下土壤与稻米中重金属含量和污染风险评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(22): 146-151.
[15]	张钰宁. 基于熵权-TOPSIS的黄河流域农业绿色发展水平评价及其空间差异[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(16): 230-236.