湖北农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (5): 229-235.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.05.039

• 经济·管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于用途与级别的集体建设用地入市增值收益分配研究

袁晨光, 王令超, 宋艳华, 王自威, 王磊   

  1. 河南省科学院地理研究所,郑州 450052
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-07 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-06-04
  • 作者简介:袁晨光(1993-),男,河南驻马店人,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事土地利用评价研究,(电话)15939661600(电子信箱)736509535@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省软科学研究计划项目(242400410573); 河南省科学院科技智库研究项目(240701008); 河南省科学院基本科研业务费项目(210601043)

Research on value-added income distribution of collective construction land entering the market based on land use and classification

YUAN Chen-guang, WANG Ling-chao, SONG Yan-hua, WANG Zi-wei, WANG Lei   

  1. Institute of Geographical Sciences, Henan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou 450052, China
  • Received:2022-03-07 Published:2024-05-25 Online:2024-06-04

摘要: 将影响集体建设用地入市增值收益的因素分为外部因素和内在因素,其中外部影响因素分为政府影响因素和集体影响因素,政府影响因素反映政府对增值收益的贡献,集体影响因素和内在因素共同反映集体对增值收益的贡献。以集体建设用地、农用地基准地价评估的过程数据为基础,计算影响因素分值,建立增值收益与影响因素的回归模型,依据政府、集体对增值收益的贡献,测算分用途、分级别的分配比例。结果表明,不同级别增值收益分配比例有较大差异,政府分配比例随级别的降低而减少,集体分配比例则随级别的降低而增加,每降低一个级别商业服务业用地、工矿仓储业用地,政府分配比例平均分别减少2.66%、2.34%,集体分配比例则平均分别增加2.66%、2.34%;政府在商业服务业用地增值收益中的平均分配比例为31.58%,远高于在工矿仓储业用地增值收益中23.68%的平均分配比例。

关键词: 集体建设用地, 增值收益, 分配比例, 影响因素, 用途, 级别

Abstract: The factors affecting value-added income of collective construction land entering the market were divided into external factors and internal factors. The external factors were divided into government influence factors and collective influence factors, and the government influence factor reflected the government’s contribution to value-added income. Collective influence factors and internal factors reflected collective contribution to value-added income. Based on the process data of collective construction land and agricultural land benchmark land price evaluation, the influence factor score was calculated and the regression model of value-added income and influencing factors was established. According to the contribution of government and collective to value-added income, the proportion of allocation by land use and classification was calculated. The results showed that there were great differences in the distribution proportion of value-added income at different levels, the proportion of government allocation decreased with the decrease of class, and the proportion of collective allocation increased with the decrease of class. For each decrease in the class level, the proportion of government allocation of the commercial service land, the industrial, mining and storage land would decrease by 2.66% and 2.34% respectively, and the proportion of collective distribution increased by 2.66% and 2.34% respectively. For the commercial service land, the average distribution proportion of government in the value-added income was 31.58%, which was significantly higher than 23.68% in the industrial, mining and storage land.

Key words: collective construction land, value-added income, allocation proportion, influencing factors, use, classification

中图分类号: