湖北农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (7): 82-86.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.07.015

• 园艺·特产 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于熵权法评价湖北孝感市九个桃品种果实品质

朱虹娴1, 吴宁宁1, 唐松1, 简晓英1, 程琪2, 覃芳1, 李解1, 汤亚东1, 彭裕超1, 徐浩1, 刘洪斌1, 王艳树1   

  1. 1.孝感市农业科学院,湖北 孝感 432000;
    2.湖北七仙红园区管理服务有限公司,湖北 孝昌 432900
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-28 出版日期:2025-07-25 发布日期:2025-08-22
  • 通讯作者: 王艳树(1981-),男,内蒙古赤峰人,高级农艺师,博士, (电话)15502723700 (电子信箱)15502723700@163.com。
  • 作者简介:朱虹娴(1996-),女,山东烟台人,农艺师,硕士,主要从事果树栽培生理与品质调控的研究工作,(电话)13627262050(电子信箱)534054139@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中央引导地方科技发展资金(Z135050009017); 孝感“七仙红”桃科技创新基地建设项目(ZYYD2022000043)

Evaluation of the fruit quality of nine peach varieties in Xiaogan City, Hubei Province based on the entropy weight method

ZHU Hong-xian1, WU Ning-ning1, TANG Song1, JIAN Xiao-ying1, CHENG Qi2, QIN Fang1, LI Jie1, TANG Ya-dong1, PENG Yu-chao1, XU Hao1, LIU Hong-bin1, WANG Yan-shu1   

  1. 1. Xiaogan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xiaogan 432000, Hubei, China;
    2. Hubei Qixianhong Industrial Park Management Service Co., Ltd, Xiaochang 432900, Hubei, China
  • Received:2025-02-28 Published:2025-07-25 Online:2025-08-22

摘要: 通过对湖北省孝感市不同品种桃(Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)果实品质进行分析与综合评价,为本地优良桃品种的选育与推广提供依据。在果实成熟期,对桃果实单果重、纵径、横径、可溶性固形物含量及果实硬度等指标进行测定,运用熵权法计算各项指标的综合得分,并进行差异显著性分析。结果表明,不同桃品种在果实品质上存在明显差异。其中,春蜜、春美和中桃9号在单果重方面表现突出,显著高于其他品种(P<0.05);大红袍和中油金帅可溶性固形物含量较高,甜度更优;中油蟠5号的果实硬度最大;在纵径、横径及果形指数方面,各品种也展现出不同的特点。综合评价结果显示,中桃9号、春蜜、春美3个品种的品质较好。

关键词: 桃(Prunus persica (L.) Batsch), 孝感市, 果实品质, 熵权法

Abstract: By analyzing and comprehensively evaluating the fruit quality of different varieties of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) in Xiaogan City, Hubei Province, this study provided a basis for the selection and promotion of local excellent peach varieties. During the ripening period of the fruit, the indicators such as single fruit weight, longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter, soluble solids content, and hardness of the peach fruit were measured. The entropy weight method was used to calculate the comprehensive scores of each indicator, and significant differences were analyzed. The results indicated that there were obvious differences in fruit quality among different peach varieties. Among them, Chunmi, Chunmei and Zhongtao No. 9 showed outstanding performance in terms of single fruit weight, significantly higher than other varieties(P<0.05); Dahongpao and Zhongyou Jinshuai had higher soluble solids content and better sweetness; the fruit hardness of Zhongyoupan No. 5 was the highest; in terms of longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter, and fruit shape index, each variety also exhibited different characteristics. The comprehensive evaluation results showed that the quality of three varieties, Zhongtao No. 9, Chunmi and Chunmei, was relatively good.

Key words: peach(Prunus persica (L.) Batsch), Xiaogan City, fruit quality, entropy weight method

中图分类号: