不同拌根剂对滇黄精生长、品质及土壤理化性质的影响

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.01.018

湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (1): 105-110.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.01.018

不同拌根剂对滇黄精生长、品质及土壤理化性质的影响

张明仙¹, 王立华¹, 陈子涵¹, 施本义¹, 郭力维¹, 李涛², 何霞红¹, 朱有勇¹, 赵宇¹

1.云南农业大学植物保护学院/云南农业大学农业生物多样性与病虫害控制教育部重点实验室,昆明 650201;
2.个旧市林业和草原局,云南个旧 661000

收稿日期:2025-09-04 出版日期:2026-01-25 发布日期:2026-02-10
通讯作者: 赵宇,男,云南大理人,讲师,博士,主要从事生物多样性与植物病害控制,(电子信箱)23285255@qq.com。
作者简介:张明仙(2000-),女,贵州兴仁人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为生物多样性与植物病害控制,(电子信箱)2644269578@qq.com。
基金资助:
云南省农业基础研究联合专项(202401BD070001-055); 云南省院士及科技领军人才专项-院士自由探索项目(202405AA350011)

Effects of different root dressing agents on the growth, quality, and soil physicochemical properties of Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl.

ZHANG Ming-xian¹, WANG Li-hua¹, CHEN Zi-han¹, SHI Ben-yi¹, GUO Li-wei¹, LI Tao², HE Xia-hong¹, ZHU You-yong¹, ZHAO Yu¹

1. College of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biodiversity and Pest Management of Ministry of Education, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China;
2. Gejiu Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Gejiu 661000, Yunnan, China

Received:2025-09-04 Published:2026-01-25 Online:2026-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为筛选高效拌根剂配比,探究其对滇黄精(Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl.)生长、品质及土壤理化性质的影响,以两年生滇黄精种苗为材料,将9种杀菌剂复配为4种拌根处理(A1至A4)及对照(CK)。结果表明,与CK相比,拌根剂处理显著提高了滇黄精出苗率、存苗率及抗病能力。其中A1处理(四霉素80%+福美双5%+克菌丹15%)效果最优,出苗率和存苗率分别为95.75%、95.25%,8月与9月根腐病发病率(1.25%、4.75%)显著低于CK(34.00%、49.25%);株高(114.58 cm)和产量(4 675 kg/hm²)较CK分别提高15.57%和168%;多糖、总黄酮及总皂苷含量较CK分别提升16.30%、32.46%和15.11%。此外,拌根剂提高了土壤pH和碱解氮含量,但导致土壤有机质含量下降。

关键词: 滇黄精(Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl.), 拌根剂, 农艺性状, 药用成分, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: To screen high-efficiency root dressing agent formulations and investigate their effects on the growth, quality, and soil physicochemical properties of Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl., two-year-old seedlings of Polygonatum kingianum were used as experimental materials. Nine fungicides were combined into four root dressing treatments (A1 to A4) and a control (CK). The results showed that, compared with CK, the root dressing treatments significantly improved the emergence rate, seedling survival rate, and disease resistance of Polygonatum kingianum. Among them, treatment A1 (80% tetramycin + 5% thiram + 15% captan) performed the best, with emergence and seedling survival rates of 95.75% and 95.25%, respectively. The incidence of root rot in August and September (1.25%, 4.75%) was significantly lower than that of CK (34.00%, 49.25%). Plant height (114.58 cm) and yield (4 675 kg/hm²) increased by 15.57% and 168%, respectively, compared to CK. The contents of polysaccharides, total flavonoids, and total saponins increased by 16.30%, 32.46%, and 15.11%, respectively, compared to CK. Additionally, the root dressing agent increased soil pH and alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen content but led to a decrease in soil organic matter content.

Key words: Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl., root dressing agent, agronomic traits, medicinal components, soil physicochemical properties

中图分类号:

张明仙, 王立华, 陈子涵, 施本义, 郭力维, 李涛, 何霞红, 朱有勇, 赵宇. 不同拌根剂对滇黄精生长、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(1): 105-110.

ZHANG Ming-xian, WANG Li-hua, CHEN Zi-han, SHI Ben-yi, GUO Li-wei, LI Tao, HE Xia-hong, ZHU You-yong, ZHAO Yu. Effects of different root dressing agents on the growth, quality, and soil physicochemical properties of Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl.[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2026, 65(1): 105-110.

参考文献

[1] 中国药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典第一部[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020.319-320.
[2] 柳威,林懋怡,刘晋杰,等.滇黄精研究进展及黄精研究现状[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2017,23(14):226-234.
[3] 苏文田,刘跃钧,蒋燕锋,等.黄精产业发展现状与可持续发展的建议[J].中国中药杂志,2018,43(13):2831-2835.
[4] 张磊,李辉山,杨枝中,等.云南滇黄精根茎腐病病原鉴定[J].植物病理学报,2021,51(6):1000-1004.
[5] 史云云,吴晓刚,陆占军,等.不同拌种剂对银北地区大豆农艺性状及产量的影响[J].现代农业科技,2024(23):46-48.
[6] KARDAVA K,TETZ V,VECHERKOVSKAYA M,et al.Seed dressing with M451 promotes seedling growth in wheat and reduces root phytopathogenic fungi without affecting endophytes[J].Frontiers in plant science, 2023,14:1176553.
[7] 郭峰,李庆凯,么传训,等.不同拌种剂对连作花生出苗质量、叶部病害及产量的影响[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(3):117-120.
[8] ZALLER J G,KÖNIG N,TIEFENBACHER A,et al. Pesticide seed dressings can affect the activity of various soil organisms and reduce decomposition of plant material[J].BMC ecology,2016,16(1):37.
[9] ULLAH A,ALI M,SHAHZAD K,et al.Impact of seed dressing and soil application of potassium humate on cotton plants productivity and fiber quality[J].Plants,2020,9(11):1444.
[10] KEAWKHAM T,SIRI B,HYNES R K.Effect of polymer seed coating and seed dressing with pesticides on seed quality and storability of hybrid cucumber[J].Australian journal of crop science,2014,8(10):1415-1420.
[11] CAPO L C,ZAPPINO A,REYNERI A,et al.Role of the fungicide seed dressing in controlling seed-borne Fusarium spp. infection and in enhancing the early development and grain yield of maize[J].Agronomy, 2020,10(6):784.
[12] 徐飞,韩自行,宋玉立,等.几种杀菌剂对小麦茎基腐病的防治效果[J].植物保护,2022,48(2):296-302.
[13] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[14] 尤新军,郭蕊,王琳,等.黄精总皂苷超声提取工艺研究[J].西北林学院学报,2010,25(3):163-166.
[15] 龙杰凤,胡秀虹,周邦华,等.黔东南道地黄精总黄酮的超声辅助提取工艺研究[J].贵州科学,2020,38(6):28-33.
[16] 马维思,郭兰萍,王馨,等.滇黄精根状茎腐烂病致病新种的分离鉴定[J].中国中药杂志,2021,46(21):5606-5613.
[17] 朱明,张如标,潘勇,等.不同拌种剂对玉米纹枯病的防治效果初探[J].上海农业科技,2023(5):137-138,143.
[18] 康敏,赵剑锋,顾中量,等.4种药剂拌种对白背飞虱的防治效果[J].植物保护,2016,42(2):220-224.
[19] 闫锋. 适于防治谷子粒黑穗病的拌种剂及药种比筛选[J].中国植保导刊,2024,44(10):85-88.
[20] 罗成. 微生物源杀菌剂对三七生长及缓解三七连作障碍的效果研究[D].昆明:云南农业大学,2022.
[21] 陈乐乐,郭贝贝,李北兴,等.四霉素对番茄叶霉病菌的毒力效应及田间防治效果[J].农药学学报,2017,19(3):324-330.
[22] REN J,CUI Y Q,ZHANG F,et al.Enhancement of nystatin production by redirecting precursor fluxes after disruption of the tetramycin gene from Streptomyces ahygroscopicus[J].Microbiological research,2014,169(7-8): 602-608.
[23] 钟丽娟,赵新海,张庆华,等.四霉素诱导水稻对稻瘟病的抗性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(12):6263-6264,6344.
[24] 许彦,曹剑,刘露,等.4种生物农药对党参根腐病菌的室内毒力测定[J].植物医生,2021(2):18-22.
[25] 成世杰,范昆,张彬彬,等.苹果轮纹病菌对甲基硫菌灵、克菌丹和代森联的敏感性[J].果树学报,2017,34(12):1590-1598.
[26] 刘伟,王立达,马晨,等.仙客来枯萎病药剂防治效果初探[J].中国植保导刊,2022,42(1):74-76.
[27] 何伟,罗文芳,周军辉,等.不同种衣剂对花生根腐病和白绢病病原菌抑菌效果及田间药效试验[J].农药,2024,63(8):609-614.
[28] 常晖,靳鹏博,马存德,等.不同方法炮制黄精后其化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J].世界中医药,2023,18(21):3125-3135.
[29] LIU R L,ZHANG X L,CAI Y H,et al.Research progress on medicinal components and pharmacological activities of polygonatum sibiricum[J].Journal of ethnopharmacology,2024,328:118024.
[30] WANG Q P, ZHANG C, WU X M, et al.Chitosan augments tetramycin against soft rot in kiwifruit and enhances its improvement for kiwifruit growth, quality and aroma[J].Biomolecules,2021, 11(9):1257.
[31] 陈子涵,何涛,施本义,等.黄精轮作改善土壤微生物群落缓解三七连作障碍潜力分析[J].植物病理学报,2024,54(4):787-798.

不同拌根剂对滇黄精生长、品质及土壤理化性质的影响

Effects of different root dressing agents on the growth, quality, and soil physicochemical properties of Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl.

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵彩霞, 王晋雄, 南志强, 李施蒙, 杨广环. 不同类型油菜光合生理特性及其与农艺性状的相关分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(8): 42-47.
[2]	张泽志, 尚芳, 刘姝, 封海东. 化肥与虎杖渣对27月龄虎杖生长发育的影响对比[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(8): 147-151.
[3]	乔祥梅, 王志龙, 刘列, 程加省, 黄廷芝, 程耿, 李红艳, 夏艳波, 王志伟. 西南麦区不同小麦品种（系）氮效率利用评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(7): 10-14.
[4]	周芳菊, 张道荣, 凌冬, 汤清益, 孙华卫, 唐清, 王志顺, 刘先斌, 王鑫, 汤三明. 小麦株高、旗叶和穗部性状的遗传特性及相关分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(4): 46-50.
[5]	王雯, 吴腾帅, 刘梦圆, 白海庆, 刘柏林. 氮、钾肥减量对沙地马铃薯农田土壤理化性质及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(4): 64-69.
[6]	姜成红, 周元委, 陈俊丞, 李双华, 李建民, 潘龙其. 不同抗根肿病位点对油菜的抗病性、农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(3): 74-78.
[7]	尹桂芳, 王艳青, 孙道旺, 隆文杰, 卢文洁, 王莉花. 云荞1号与米苦荞人工去雄杂交及其杂交后代农艺性状分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 38-41.
[8]	詹亚斌, 潘巧云, 刘波, 潘炜铭, 杨马, 李辉, 石倩满, 何志刚. 连作对潜江半夏土壤理化性质、养分及重金属含量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 52-55.
[9]	孙瑞敏, 陈立娜, 腊贵晓, 理向阳, 杨铁钢. 六种山药农艺性状、营养品质及抗氧化功能的比较[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 156-160.
[10]	闫振华, 黄晓莉, 戴宝生, 张华崇, 赵树琪, 张欣, 李蔚. 52份早熟棉品系农艺性状及产量构成综合评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(10): 10-15.
[11]	吴伯萍, 霍柳青, 马海杰, 高永彬, 徐凯. 施用生物炭对猕猴桃园土壤理化性质和果实品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(1): 100-103.
[12]	张泽志, 陈盛虎, 周才华, 马兆成, 赵晓武, 罗湘胤, 张升明, 张勇洪, 封海东. 红乌杂交天麻栽培及其不同海拔的质量比较[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(9): 114-118.
[13]	刘明, 梁均平, 张迪, 何欢. 不同植物生长延缓剂对切花向日葵农艺性状的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(7): 83-86.
[14]	刘东海, 毛庆华, 邓辉, 梅亮贤, 罗杰, 乔艳, 张智, 胡诚. 秸秆还田配施化肥下麦田土壤理化性质和酶活性的变化[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(5): 12-16.
[15]	张智英, 张旺林, 张连水. 有机无机肥配施显著改善枣园土壤理化性质及金丝小枣产量和品质[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(4): 17-23.