湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (9): 12-16.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.09.003

• 育种·栽培 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同干旱胁迫下种植模式对棉花生长、产量形成及纤维品质的影响

侯慧杰1, 吉春容2, 孙帅3, 彭靖婷1, 胡皓楠1, 吴思怡4, 杨明凤1   

  1. 1.乌兰乌苏农业气象试验站,新疆 石河子 832000;
    2.新疆维吾尔自治区气候中心,乌鲁木齐 830000;
    3.中国气象局乌鲁木齐沙漠气象研究所,乌鲁木齐 830000;
    4.石河子气象局,新疆 石河子 832000
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-18 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-17
  • 通讯作者: 杨明凤(1985-),女,河南信阳人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事农业气象研究,(电子信箱)490109498@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:侯慧杰(1993-),女,河南周口人,工程师,硕士,主要从事农业气象研究,(电子信箱)2465492360@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    第八师石河子市农业气象重点实验室建设项目(2025PT01)

Effects of planting patterns on cotton growth, yield formation and fiber quality under different drought stresses

HOU Hui-jie1, JI Chun-rong2, SUN Shuai3, PENG JING-ting1, HU Hao-nan1, WU Si-yi4, YANG Ming-feng1   

  1. 1. Wulanwusu Agrometeorological Experimental Station, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China;
    2. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Climate Center, Urumqi 830000, China;
    3. Urumqi Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830000, China;
    4. Shihezi Meteorological Bureau, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2026-06-18 Published:2026-09-25 Online:2026-09-17

摘要: 为探究不同干旱胁迫条件下种植模式对棉花生长、产量形成及纤维品质的影响,以新疆干旱区主栽棉花品种新陆早78号为试验材料,采用两因素裂区试验设计,以干旱胁迫为主区,种植模式为副区,设置正常灌溉(W1)、中度干旱(W2)和重度干旱(W3)3个水分处理及“宽早优”(M1)和“矮密早”(M2)2个种植模式处理,系统分析了不同干旱胁迫下种植模式对棉花生长、产量形成及纤维品质的影响。结果表明,干旱胁迫、种植模式及其交互作用均对棉花株高、茎粗、果枝台数、干物质量、单株结铃数、单铃重、皮棉产量、衣分及纤维品质产生显著(P<0.05)或极显著(P<0.01)影响。具体表现为,随着干旱程度加重,棉花株高、茎粗、果枝台数、干物质量、产量、衣分及纤维品质整体呈下降趋势。在相同干旱条件下,M1株高、果枝台数、单株结铃数、单铃重及皮棉产量均显著高于M2,其中在W2下皮棉产量提高13.96%。同时,M1下棉花马克隆值较低,而断裂比强度、上半部平均长度和长度整齐度指数均高于M2,表明其纤维品质表现更优。综合分析认为,“宽早优”种植模式能够有效缓解干旱胁迫对棉花生长、产量形成及纤维品质的不利影响,更适宜在新疆干旱区棉花生产中推广应用。

关键词: 棉花, 干旱胁迫, 种植模式, 生长特性, 产量, 纤维品质

Abstract: To investigate the effects of planting patterns on cotton growth, yield formation and fiber quality under different drought-stress conditions, the dominant cotton cultivar Xinluzao 78 in arid regions of Xinjiang was used as experimental material. A two-factor split-plot experimental design was adopted, with drought stress as the main-plot factor and planting pattern as the sub-plot factor. Three water treatments, including well-watered condition (W1), moderate drought (W2) and severe drought (W3), and two planting patterns of “wide-row, early-maturing and optimal-management” (M1) and “dense-planting, dwarf-cultivation and early-maturing” (M2) were set up. The influences of planting patterns on cotton growth, yield formation and fiber quality under different drought stresses were systematically analyzed. The results showed that drought stress, planting pattern and their interaction exerted significant (P<0.05) or extremely significant (P<0.01) effects on plant height, stem diameter, number of fruiting branches, dry matter accumulation, boll number per plant, single boll weight, lint yield, lint percent and fiber quality of cotton. Overall, plant height, stem diameter, fruiting branch number, dry matter weight, yield, lint percent and fiber quality decreased with the aggravation of drought stress. Under identical drought conditions, M1 exhibited significantly higher plant height, fruiting branch number, boll number per plant, single boll weight and lint yield than M2, with the lint yield increased by 13.96% under W2. Meanwhile, cotton under M1 had a lower micronaire value, yet higher breaking tenacity, upper-half mean length and length uniformity index compared with M2, indicating better fiber quality. Comprehensive analysis demonstrated that the “wide-row, early-maturing and optimal-management” planting pattern could effectively alleviate the adverse impacts of drought stress on cotton growth, yield formation and fiber quality, which was more suitable for popularization and application in cotton production in arid regions of Xinjiang.

Key words: cotton, drought stress, planting patterns, growth traits, yield, fiber quality

中图分类号: