Comparison of anesthetic effect of MS-222 and eugenol on Xenocypris davidi

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.08.021

Abstract

Abstract: In order to study the anesthesia effect of MS-222 and eugenol on Xenocypris davidi, the Xenocypris davidi with a body weight of （20.10±1.28） g was selected and the anesthesia effect of the Xenocypris davidi was observed under different conditions. The results showed that with the increase of the concentrations of the two anesthetics, the time spent in anesthesia for Xenocypris davidi showed a decreasing trend, the recovery time of the MS-222 group was shortened, and the recovery time of eugenol was prolonged. When the mass concentration of MS-222 was 120 mg/L, or the mass concentration of eugenol was 30~60 mg/L, the Xenocypris davidi could be anesthetized within 3 minutes and resuscitated within 5 minutes. With the increase of the concentration of the two anesthetics, the respiratory rate of the experimental fish first increased and then decreased. Under the condition of the same mass concentration of the two anesthetics, with the continuous increase of the water temperature, the anesthesia time of the Xenocypris davidi showed a decreasing trend. And the recovery time of the eugenol treatment group continued to shorten, while the recovery time after MS-222 anesthesia was not significantly different at 10~20 ℃, and was significantly prolonged at 25 ℃（P<0.05）. After anesthesia, with the increase of exposure time in the air, the resuscitation time of the MS-222 group showed a continuously prolonged trend, and the resuscitation time of the eugenol group was shortened at 4 minutes, and then continued to prolong. The MS-222 of 120 mg/L and eugenol of 30~60 mg/L had good anesthesia effect on Xenocypris davidi, and both could be used as ideal anesthetics for Xenocypris davidi.

Key words: Xenocypris davidi, anesthesia time, recovery time, respiratory rate, MS-222, eugenol

CLC Number:

S917

CHEN Jun-ping, WU Hui-hui, SHEN Fang-fang, ZHANG Jia-xin, YU Ruo-meng, FU Yong-jie, ZHAO Dao-quan, XIE Guo-qiang, SUN Wen-xi. Comparison of anesthetic effect of MS-222 and eugenol on Xenocypris davidi[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2023, 62(8): 133-139.

References

[1] 黄邦星. 黄尾密鲴生物学特性及养殖技术[J]. 水产养殖,2006(3):32-34.
[2] 谢晶, 曹杰. 渔用麻醉剂在鱼类麻醉保活运输中应用的研究进展[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2021, 30(1): 189-196.
[3] MATTSON N S,RIPLE T H.Metomidate, a better anesthetic for cod (Gadus morhua) in comparison with benzocaine, MS-222, chlorobutanol, and phenoxyethanol[J]. Aquaculture,1989,83(1-2):89-94.
[4] 严银龙, 施永海, 张海明,等. MS-222、丁香酚对刀鲚幼鱼的麻醉效果[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2016, 25(2): 177-182.
[5] 郝长杰, 庄平, 赵峰, 等. MS-222和丁香酚对暗纹东方鲀幼鱼麻醉效果的比较研究[J]. 海洋渔业,2019,41(5): 546-554.
[6] 王文豪,董宏标,孙永旭, 等. MS-222和丁香酚在大口黑鲈幼鱼模拟运输中的麻醉效果[J]. 南方水产科学,2018,14(6):52-58.
[7] 杨乐, 张晓林, 刘贤德. 丁香油、MS-222和异丙酚对大黄鱼的麻醉效果分析[J]. 渔业现代化, 2021, 48(2): 91-96.
[8] 陈德芳,汪开毓,肖丹,等. 丁香酚对鲫鱼麻醉效果的研究[J]. 水产科技情报, 2010, 37(6): 288-291.
[9] MARKING L L, MEYER F P.Fisheries are better anesthetics needed in fisheries?[J]. Fisheries, 1985, 10(6): 2-5.
[10] 刘长琳, 何力, 陈四清, 等. 鱼类麻醉研究综述[J]. 渔业现代化, 2007, 34(5): 21-25.
[11] WOOLSEY J, HOLCOMB M, INGERMANN R.Effect of temperature on clove oil anesthesia in steelhead fry[J]. North American journal of aquaculture, 2004, 66(1): 35-41.
[12] DEVI A A, KAMILYA D.Efficacy and effects of clove oil and MS2 on the immune‐biochemical responses of juvenile rohu Labeo rohita[J]. Aquaculture research, 2019, 50(3):957-963.
[13] 关健, 官曙光, 郑永允, 等. 2-苯氧乙醇和丁香酚对许氏平鲉幼鱼麻醉效果的实验研究[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2010, 31(6): 22-28.
[14] 周裕华, 潘桂平, 周文玉. 丁香酚对鲻鱼麻醉效果研究[J]. 水产科技情报, 2016, 43(6): 332-334.
[15] ANDERSON W G, MCKINLEY R S, COLAVECCHIA M.The use of clove oil as an anesthetic for rainbow trout and its effects on swimming performance[J]. North American journal of fisheries management, 1997, 17(2): 301-307.
[16] 何蓉, 谢晶. 水产品保活技术研究现状和进展[J]. 食品与机械, 2012, 28(5): 243-246.
[17] 张建明, 田甜, 姜伟. 丁香酚对长薄鳅幼鱼麻醉效果的研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(2): 451-456.
[18] 赵明, 柳学周, 徐永江, 等. MS-222麻醉圆斑星鲽成鱼效果研究[J]. 海洋科学进展, 2010, 28(4): 531-537.
[19] 胡发文, 李莉, 刘元文, 等. 丁香油和MS-222对大泷六线鱼幼鱼的麻醉效果[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(6): 671-675.
[20] 曹晓聪, 黄小林, 孙莘溢, 等. 丁香酚对黄斑篮子鱼幼鱼麻醉效果的研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2019, 15(3): 50-56.
[21] 黄小林, 戴超, 虞为, 等. 丁香酚对卵形鲳鲹幼鱼的麻醉效果[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2020, 40(4): 124-131.
[22] 王万良, 王金林, 曾本和, 等. 丁香酚对异齿裂腹鱼的麻醉效果[J]. 水产学杂志, 2019, 32(5): 60-65
[23] 王维鑫, 崔爱君, 徐永江, 等. MS-222和丁香油对黄条(鱼师)麻醉效果研究[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2021, 42(6): 205-214.
[24] 李乐, 樊英, 王晓璐, 等. 不同温度下MS-222对硬头鳟幼鱼的麻醉效果[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(3):155-160.
[25] 张民强, 汪开毓, 王均, 等. MS-222对斑点叉尾鮰麻醉效果的研究[J]. 水产科技情报, 2014, 41(1): 21-25,31.
[26] 包杰,姜宏波,卢焕云,等. 丁香油对泥鳅麻醉效果的研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2014, 45(5): 621-624.
[27] 包杰, 冯帆, 于业辉, 等. 丁香油对孔雀鱼麻醉效果的研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(12): 162-163.
[28] 杜浩,危起伟,杨德国,等. MS-222、丁香油、苯唑卡因对养殖美洲鲥幼鱼的麻醉效果[J]. 大连水产学院学报,2007,22(1):20-26.