湖北农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (4): 184-191.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.04.031

• 经济·管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

异质性环境分权、环境规制对生态福利绩效的影响——基于双向固定效应模型分析

郑然, 李莉, 王志强, 张萌萌   

  1. 新疆农业大学公共管理学院(法学院),乌鲁木齐 830052
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-20 出版日期:2025-04-25 发布日期:2025-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 李莉(1972-),女,重庆荣昌人,副教授,博士,主要从事资源经济与管理研究,(电子信箱)466347947@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:郑然(1997-),男,江苏南京人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为资源经济与管理,(电子信箱)1357903550@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72164035); 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2022D01A85); 新疆维吾尔自治区高校基本科研业务费项目(XJEDU2022J005)

The impact of heterogeneous environmental decentralization and environmental regulation on ecological welfare performance:Analysis based on bidirectional fixed effect model

ZHENG Ran, LI Li, WANG Zhi-qiang, ZHANG Meng-meng   

  1. School of Public Administration(Law School), Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
  • Received:2024-01-20 Published:2025-04-25 Online:2025-05-12

摘要: 测度了2010—2021年中国省域生态福利绩效,采用双向固定效应模型实证了环境分权、环境规制对生态福利绩效的影响,并在此基础上进行区域性与环境分权程度的异质性检验。结果表明,研究期内中国生态福利绩效表现为平缓的倒“U”形发展趋势,整体上呈下降态势,区域按绩效水平排序为东部>中部>西部;环境分权对生态福利绩效有显著激励作用;环境规制对绩效的改善具有直接效应,二者交互项也促进了生态福利绩效水平的提高;在分区域检验中,环境分权对东部、中部、西部区域绩效的影响分别为显著为正、显著为负与负向不显著;高分权程度地区与低分权程度地区则分别促进和抑制了生态福利绩效的提升,且低分权程度相较于高分权程度地区其负向影响更大。基于研究结果提出建议,即建立合理的财权与事权划分制度;调整环境规制强度,因地制宜地确定各省环境税率;优化政绩考核体系,避免地方政府将“援助之手”转变为损害人民福祉的“攫取之手”。

关键词: 环境分权, 环境规制, 生态福利绩效, 固定效应模型

Abstract: The ecological welfare performance (EWP) of China’s provinces from 2010 to 2021 was measured, and the impacts of environmental decentralization and environmental regulation on EWP were empirically examined by employing a two-way fixed effects model. Furthermore, heterogeneity analyses were conducted based on regional differences and varying degrees of environmental decentralization. The results showed that China’s ecological welfare performance exhibited a gentle inverted “U” shape over the study period, with an overall declining trend. The regions were ranked as east > middle > west by performance level. Environmental decentralization had a significant incentive effect on ecological welfare performance. Environmental regulation had a direct effect on the improvement of ecological welfare performance, and their interaction also promoted the improvement of ecological welfare performance. In the regional tests, the impacts of environmental decentralization on the performance of the eastern, central, and western regions were significantly positive, significantly negative, and negatively insignificant respectively; regions with high decentralization and regions with low decentralization promoted and inhibited the improvement of ecological welfare performance respectively, and the negative impact of regions with low decentralization was greater than that of regions with high decentralization. Based on the research results, the following suggestions were put forward: Establish a rational division of fiscal and administrative powers; appropriately adjust the intensity of environmental regulation, coordinate environmental tax rates across provinces according to local conditions; improve the performance evaluation system to prevent local governments from turning a “helping hand” into a “grabbing hand” that harmed people’s well-being.

Key words: environmental decentralization, environmental regulation, ecological welfare performance, fixed effect model

中图分类号: