烟台产区不同品种干红葡萄酒理化指标及抗氧化活性分析

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.01.023

湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (1): 137-143.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.01.023

烟台产区不同品种干红葡萄酒理化指标及抗氧化活性分析

李欣蔚¹, 孔维府^1,2, 沙坤^1,2

1.中国农业大学烟台研究院,山东烟台 264670;
2.烟台市葡萄酒风味技术重点实验室,山东烟台 264670

收稿日期:2025-09-01 出版日期:2026-01-25 发布日期:2026-02-10
通讯作者: 沙坤（1978-）,女,吉林吉林人,副教授,博士,主要从事食品加工与质量安全方面研究,（电话）18612423122（电子信箱）kun.sha@163.com。
作者简介:李欣蔚（2003-）,女,山东济南人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为葡萄与葡萄酒工程,（电话）18553157106（电子信箱）1983441611@qq.com。
基金资助:
基于现代产业学院目标要求的葡萄与葡萄酒工程专业建设项目

Analysis of physical and chemical index and antioxidant activity of different varieties of dry red wine in Yantai producing area

LI Xin-wei¹, KONG Wei-fu^1,2, SHA Kun^1,2

1. Yantai Institute of China Agricultural University, Yantai 264670, Shandong, China;
2. Yantai Key Laboratory of Wine Flavour Technology, Yantai 264670, Shandong, China

Received:2025-09-01 Published:2026-01-25 Online:2026-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究烟台产区不同品种干红葡萄酒的理化指标及抗氧化活性差异,选取了烟台产区的赤霞珠、蛇龙珠、西拉、品丽珠4个品种的干红葡萄酒作为研究对象,以ABTS自由基清除能力、DPPH自由基清除能力、铁氰化钾还原力作为体外抗氧化活性分析指标,研究不同品种干红葡萄酒抗氧化能力差异,同时测定了包括总酚、pH、可滴定酸度、总糖在内的多个理化指标,并分析其相关性。结果表明,总多酚含量与pH呈极显著负相关（P<0.01）,与DPPH自由基清除率以及果糖含量呈显著正相关（P<0.05）,pH与DPPH自由基清除率和果糖含量呈显著负相关（P<0.05）。可滴定酸度与密度呈显著正相关（P<0.05）,而与乙醇呈显著负相关（P<0.05）。苹果酸与丙三醇以及葡萄糖酸呈显著正相关（P<0.05）。总糖与果糖呈显著正相关（P<0.05）,与黄酮含量呈显著负相关（P<0.05）,果糖与黄酮含量也呈显著负相关（P<0.05）。在各抗氧化指标中,ABTS自由基清除率以及铁氰化钾还原力与各理化指标没有显著相关性（P>0.05）,同时各抗氧化指标相互之间不存在显著相关性（P>0.05）。可以看出,在本试验中与干红葡萄酒抗氧化能力直接相关的指标是总多酚含量,而pH与果糖含量则是通过影响总多酚含量而间接影响葡萄酒的抗氧化能力。

关键词: 烟台产区, 葡萄品种, 干红葡萄酒, 抗氧化

Abstract: In order to investigate the differences in physicochemical indexes and antioxidant activity of different varieties of dry red wine in Yantai producing area, four different varieties of dry red wine produced in Yantai, including Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischt, Syrah and Cabernet Franc, were selected as the research objects,and the antioxidant activity of different dry red wines was studied by using the ABTS free radical scavenging ability, DPPH free radical scavenging ability, and potassium ferricyanide reduction capacity as the indexes of antioxidant activity in vitro. Multiple physicochemical parameters including total phenols, pH, titratable acidity, and total sugar were also measured, and their correlation was analyzed. The results showed that the content of total phenol was negatively correlated with pH (P<0.01), and positively correlated with DPPH free radical scavenging rate and fructose content (P<0.05). pH exhibited a significant negative correlation with both DPPH scavenging rate and fructose content (P<0.05). Titratable acidity showed a significant positive correlation with density (P<0.05),but a significant negative correlation with ethanol content (P<0.05). Malic acid demonstrated significant positive correlations with glycerol and gluconic acid (P<0.05). Total sugar showed a significant positive correlation with fructose (P<0.05) and a significant negative correlation with flavonoid content (P<0.05), while fructose also exhibited a significant negative correlation with flavonoid content (P<0.05). Among various antioxidant parameters, the ABTS free radical scavenging capacity and potassium ferricyanide reducing power showed no significant correlation with physicochemical indicators (P>0.05), nor did they exhibit significant correlations among themselves (P>0.05). The results indicated that total polyphenol content directly correlated with red wine’s antioxidant capacity in this study, while the pH and fructose content indirectly influenced wine’s antioxidant capacity through their effects on total polyphenol content.

Key words: Yantai production area, grape variety, dry red wine, antioxidant

中图分类号:

TS262.6

李欣蔚, 孔维府, 沙坤. 烟台产区不同品种干红葡萄酒理化指标及抗氧化活性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(1): 137-143.

LI Xin-wei, KONG Wei-fu, SHA Kun. Analysis of physical and chemical index and antioxidant activity of different varieties of dry red wine in Yantai producing area[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2026, 65(1): 137-143.

参考文献

[1] 赵旭,张欣珂,陈新军,等.葡萄酒中的酚类物质Ⅱ:辅色效应与生物活性研究进展[J].食品科学,2019,40(17):284-294.
[2] 刘谖. 红酒人生[J].经济视角,2011(5):50-53.
[3] 陈鑫龙,张媛媛,徐令斌,等.用多酚类指标表征干红葡萄酒味感质量的模型构建[J].农业工程学报,2024,40(8):281-289.
[4] 游蕴竹,张亚蕾,杨薇熹,等.我国五个产区‘赤霞珠’和‘美乐’干红葡萄酒的香气特征差异解析[J].中国酿造,2024,43(4):29-38.
[5] ROCHA-PARRA D F, LANARI M C, ZAMORA M C, et al. Influence of storage conditions on phenolic compounds stability, antioxidant capacity and colour of freeze-dried encapsulated red wine[J]. LWT-Food science and technology, 2016, 70: 162-170.
[6] MARQUEZ A, SERRATOSA M P, LOPEZ-TOLEDANO A, et al.Colour and phenolic compounds in sweet red wines from Merlot and Tempranillo grapes chamber-dried under controlled conditions[J]. Food chemistry, 2012, 130(1): 111-120.
[7] 常甜甜. 干红葡萄酒中酚类物质和抗氧化性的研究[D].山东烟台:烟台大学,2020.
[8] HE F, MU L, YAN G L, et al.Biosynthesis of anthocyanins and their regulation in colored grapes[J]. Molecules, 2010, 15(12): 9057-9091.
[9] 范文来,徐岩,李记明,等.应用HS-SPME技术分析葡萄果皮与果肉挥发性香气物质[J].食品与发酵工业,2011,37(12):113-118.
[10] 丁建才. 河北昌黎产区干红葡萄酒品质及真菌群落多样性的比较研究[D].江苏扬州:扬州大学,2021.
[11] 李雨陶,何怀华,曹圆,等.贺兰山东麓不同红葡萄品种与葡萄酒花色苷组分分析[J].中国酿造,2024,43(5):47-52.
[12] 王巧莉. 贺兰山东麓5个红色酿酒葡萄品种的果实与葡萄酒品质比较研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2021.
[13] 周鹤,张佳佳,时蒙蒙,等.冷浸渍时间和发酵温度对西拉桃红葡萄酒品质的影响[J].中国酿造,2022,41(6):178-183.
[14] 赵旗峰,谭伟,董志刚,等.‘品丽珠’、‘西拉’和‘黑比诺’3个酿酒葡萄品种不同营养系果实品质比较分析[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(28):56-60.
[15] CRUCIANI S, TRENTA M, RASSU G, et al.Identifying a role of red and white wine extracts in counteracting skin aging: Effects of antioxidants on fibroblast behavior[J]. Antioxidants,2021,10(2):227.
[16] 闻雯. 干红葡萄酒代谢产物的核磁共振分析及抗氧化性研究[D].江苏扬州:扬州大学,2012.
[17] DI MAJO D,GIAMMANCO M,LA GUARDIA M,et al.Flavanones in Citrus fruit:Structure-antioxidant activity relationships[J]. Food research international, 2005, 38(10): 1161-1166.
[18] 王晶,万智博,许超丽,等.新疆产区酿酒葡萄果实中有机酸的比较分析[J].现代食品科技,2020,36(2):249-254,69.
[19] DESHAIES S, CAZALS G, ENJALBAL C, et al.Red wine oxidation: Accelerated ageing tests, possible reaction mechanisms and application to syrah red wines[J]. Antioxidants, 2020, 9(8): 663.
[20] MILOŠEVIĆ T, MILOŠEVIĆ N, MLADENOVIĆ J. Soluble solids, acidity, phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of fruits and berries cultivated in Serbia[J]. Fruits,2016,71(4):239-248.
[21] CÔTÉ J, CAILLET S, DOYON G, et al. Effects of juice processing on cranberry antioxidant properties[J]. Food research international, 2011, 44(9): 2907-2914.
[22] WANG S, MANTILLA S M O, STOKES J R, et al. pH dominates the temporal perception of astringency sub-qualities and saliva friction response-a study under iso-pH and iso-titratable acidity conditions in model wine[J]. Food hydrocolloids, 2024, 146: 109274.
[23] 胡博然,闻雯,阴淑贞,等.电子顺磁共振波谱仪分析干红葡萄酒DPPH清除能力及其与总酚含量的关系[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(1):135-141.
[24] MAHMOOD T, ANWAR F, BHATTI I A, et al.Effect of maturity on proximate composition, phenolics and antioxidant attributes of cherry fruit[J]. Pakistan journal of botany,2013,45(3):909-914.
[25] SERRANO M, GUILLÉN F, MARTÍNEZ-ROMERO D, et al. Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2005, 53(7): 2741-2745.
[26] SANNA D, DELOGU G, MULAS M, et al.Determination of free radical scavenging activity of plant extracts through DPPH assay: An EPR and UV-Vis study[J]. Food analytical methods, 2012, 5(4): 759-766.
[27] NEMETH T, DE WILD T, GUBLER L, et al.Impact of substitution on reactions and stability of one-electron oxidised phenyl sulfonates in aqueous solution[J]. Physical chemistry chemical physics, 2022, 24(2): 895-901.

烟台产区不同品种干红葡萄酒理化指标及抗氧化活性分析

Analysis of physical and chemical index and antioxidant activity of different varieties of dry red wine in Yantai producing area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高翔, 郑润愽, 朱越, 李宇, 王晴芳, 罗凯, 何美军, 石爱华. 恩施州不同海拔五倍子没食子酸含量与生物活性评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(1): 111-115.
[2]	郭志明, 余子铭, 程繁杨, 陈德林, 程长松, 姜华, 余佑文, 訾化彬, 涂修亮. 不同桂花品种对桂花绿茶生化成分与抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(9): 96-101.
[3]	杨栋渊, 蔡华勇, 李孟霞, 苏丕仁, 普兆山, 熊普娟, 陈洪, 汤开武, 刘锋, 耿少武. 不同磷水平对烤烟生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(8): 79-84.
[4]	樊力华, 李金洲, 李梦琪, 周广运, 邓青梅, 魏江存, 陈勇. 当归藤原花青素的纯化工艺及体外抗氧化活性[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(6): 155-160.
[5]	李明珠, 袁磊, 张学真, 颜晓倩. 龙牙草多酚提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(5): 128-133.
[6]	于旺堂, 许明月, 唐培鑫. 亚临界萃取光皮木瓜果皮精油的工艺优化及抗氧化活性[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(4): 158-163.
[7]	胡若群, 杨卓生, 王舟帆, 郑庆华, 游永彬, 解叶龙, 兰坤霖, 陈莹. 外源甜菜碱对NaCl胁迫下大红三角梅生理特性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(3): 86-91.
[8]	江舒, 郑玉凤, 吴芳, 张锦凡, 熊佳怡, 胡婷. 微波辅助提取松乳菇多糖及其抗氧化性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(3): 138-143.
[9]	叶晨英, 王敏, 何婷, 莫意龙, 周改莲, 李海霞. 肉桂挥发油热稳定性研究及其抗氧化剂筛选[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(3): 149-155.
[10]	田占萍, 王宇, 吉舒仪, 谭峻杰, 姚军, 沈静. 荒漠肉苁蓉总低聚糖提取工艺优化及生物活性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(2): 156-161.
[11]	姚敏敏, 张荣祥, 唐海燕, 倪德江, 陈玉琼. 青砖茶饼干的研制[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(2): 162-165.
[12]	王葳锐, 卫炳安, 潘乔丹, 黄元河, 赵丽阳, 徐影影. 赤苍藤茎叶多糖的组成及活性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 146-151.
[13]	孙瑞敏, 陈立娜, 腊贵晓, 理向阳, 杨铁钢. 六种山药农艺性状、营养品质及抗氧化功能的比较[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 156-160.
[14]	熊军波, 张鹤山, 田宏, 陆姣云, 吴新江, 刘洋. 铝胁迫对四种苜蓿属植物种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 170-174.
[15]	黄少军, 黄诗娅, 李泰球, 黄浩, 周兰, 李婉. 广西地不容黄酮超声辅助提取工艺优化及抗氧化性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 175-180.