江汉平原大豆玉米带状复合种植模式优化与品种筛选

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.06.005

湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (6): 26-30.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.06.005

江汉平原大豆玉米带状复合种植模式优化与品种筛选

马盛峰¹, 何莉莉², 池立军¹, 田平平¹, 李先梅¹, 孙勇胜¹, 熊婷¹, 周登文²

1.公安县农业农村科技服务中心,湖北公安 434300;
2.荆州市农业技术推广中心,湖北荆州 434020

收稿日期:2025-12-25 出版日期:2026-06-25 发布日期:2026-06-26
通讯作者: 周登文（1973-）,男,湖北仙桃人,农艺师,主要从事农作物栽培技术推广工作,（电子信箱）jzzbzdw@163.com。
作者简介:马盛峰（1986-）,男,河南淮滨人,农艺师,主要从事种植业生产与农业技术推广工作,（电子信箱）253290801@qq.com。
基金资助:
公安县2024年大豆玉米带状复合种植项目

Optimization of strip intercropping patterns and variety screening for soybean and maize in the Jianghan Plain

MA Sheng-feng¹, HE Li-li², CHI Li-jun¹, TIAN Ping-ping¹, LI Xian-mei¹, SUN Yong-sheng¹, XIONG Ting¹, ZHOU Deng-wen²

1. Gongʼan County Agricultural and Rural Science and Technology Service Center, Gongʼan 434300, Hubei, China;
2. Jingzhou Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Jingzhou 434020, Hubei, China

Received:2025-12-25 Published:2026-06-25 Online:2026-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为筛选适宜江汉平原大豆玉米带状复合种植的高效模式与优良品种组合,以缓解粮豆“争地”矛盾,于2024年在湖北省公安县采用裂区试验设计,主区设置3种种植模式（M1:4行玉米+7行大豆,带宽480 cm;M2:4行玉米+6行大豆,带宽450 cm;M3:2行玉米+4行大豆,带宽250 cm）,副区为9个玉米和大豆品种组合。结果表明,种植模式与品种组合的主效应对大豆产量和系统效益指标影响均达显著（P<0.05）或极显著（P<0.01）水平,二者交互作用不显著（P>0.05）。主效应分析显示,M1模式的大豆产量、总产值、净利润及土地当量比均显著优于M2和M3模式,且净利润是玉米或大豆单作的2倍以上。玉米品种康农玉8009与大豆品种中豆63或南农60的组合在所有组合中综合表现都较佳,其系统产量、总产值和土地当量比均显著高于其他多数组合。综合比较所有处理,M1模式与“康农玉8009+中豆63”或“康农玉8009+南农60”组合表现较优,其总产值分别达24 211、24 209元/hm²,且该模式机械化适应性好,因此推荐这2种组合作为江汉平原地区大豆玉米带状复合种植的主推模式。

关键词: 大豆[Glycine max(Linn.) Merr.], 玉米（Zea mays L.）, 带状复合种植模式, 品种筛选, 交互作用, 土地当量比

Abstract: To screen the high-efficiency mode and excellent variety combination suitable for soybean-maize strip compound planting in the Jianghan Plain, so as to alleviate the land competition between grain and soybean crops, a split-plot field experiment was conducted in Gong’an County, Hubei Province in 2024. Three planting patterns were arranged in the main plots: M1 (4 rows of maize + 7 rows of soybean, with a strip width of 480 cm), M2 (4 rows of maize + 6 rows of soybean, with a strip width of 450 cm), and M3 (2 rows of maize + 4 rows of soybean, with a strip width of 250 cm). Nine maize-soybean variety combinations were assigned to the subplots. The results showed that the main effects of planting pattern and variety combination on soybean yield and system benefit indexes were significant (P<0.05) or extremely significant (P<0.01), and the interaction between the two was not significant (P>0.05). The main effect analysis showed that the soybean yield, total output value, net profit and land equivalent ratio of M1 were significantly better than those of M2 and M3, and its net profit was more than twice that of maize or soybean monoculture. The combination of maize variety Kangnongyu 8009 and soybean varieties Zhongdou 63 or Nannong 60 had better comprehensive performance in all combinations, and its system yield, total output value and land equivalent ratio were significantly higher than those of most other combinations. Based on comprehensive comparison of all treatments, pattern M1 combined with ‘Kangnongyu 8009 + Zhongdou 63’ or ‘Kangnongyu 8009 + Nannong 60’ performed optimally, with total output values reaching 24 211 yuan/hm² and 24 209 yuan/hm², respectively. In addition, this pattern showed good adaptability to mechanized operation. Therefore, these two combinations are recommended as the dominant models for soybean-maize strip intercropping in the Jianghan Plain region.

Key words: soybean[Glycine max(Linn.) Merr.], maize (Zea mays L.), strip intercropping pattern, variety screening, interaction effect, land equivalent ratio

中图分类号:

马盛峰, 何莉莉, 池立军, 田平平, 李先梅, 孙勇胜, 熊婷, 周登文. 江汉平原大豆玉米带状复合种植模式优化与品种筛选[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 26-30.

MA Sheng-feng, HE Li-li, CHI Li-jun, TIAN Ping-ping, LI Xian-mei, SUN Yong-sheng, XIONG Ting, ZHOU Deng-wen. Optimization of strip intercropping patterns and variety screening for soybean and maize in the Jianghan Plain[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2026, 65(6): 26-30.

[1]	李阳, 田茂涛, 张作林, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 谢艺, 程建平. 长江中游地区再生稻品种丰产性和稻米品质分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 1-8.
[2]	李昌焱, 王建宇, 胡容, 张作林, 付冬, 周浩, 田贵生, 游艾青, 陈志军, 周雷. 基于52份优质籼型杂交稻的湖北省再生稻适宜品种筛选[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 9-13.
[3]	张超一, 纪元, 刁红霞, 宋海妹. 海藻提取物配施液体肥对旱作玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 20-25.
[4]	洪俊, 刘春山, 李翠, 彭征途, 陈晨, 方烈, 朱士波, 杨利. 镉低积累水稻在鄂东地区的产量表现与糙米元素吸收特征[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(4): 37-43.
[5]	朱祥芬, 王静, 杨秀乾, 刘好梁, 周兴, 李江, 刘传兵. 适宜湖北省恩施州种植的高产优质糯玉米新品种筛选[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(1): 12-16.
[6]	余启芝, 胡建林, 薛莲, 郑兴飞, 董华林, 汪本福, 王红波, 彭宣国, 钟余平, 邬文晖, 徐得泽. 潜江市虾稻共作模式水稻品种筛选试验[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(12): 42-46.
[7]	朱杰, 温海霞, 方治国, 宿秀丽, 张杰, 吴峰, 李晓敏, 王文建. 不同马铃薯品种产量及营养品质分析与评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(12): 33-37，68.
[8]	祝静雪, 王莹, 房晓琨, 陈展宇. 不同N、P、K配比对玉米光合生理特性、光合产物及子粒产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(10): 13-21.
[9]	于华丽, 温四民, 张桂玲, 董传洁, 程乾. 重金属胁迫对向日葵种子萌发特征影响评价及花海品种筛选[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(1): 122-127.
[10]	钱建财, 付金存, 赵才能, 吴佳, 王猷胜, 韩云龙. 基于品牌应用的阿根廷烟叶品种筛选研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(3): 112-116.
[11]	陈琴, 郭元元, 张力, 李洋, 刘贻坤, 周生茂, 车江旅, 陈振东. 不同香葱品种富硒能力鉴定评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(22): 94-98.
[12]	李洪臣, 常剑波, 彭润润, 李举旭, 张继帅, 张小全, 陈彦春. 三门峡市灵宝烟区烤烟适宜品种评价与筛选[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(13): 82-86.
[13]	陈宇, 袁宏安, 韩芳, 郑太波, 张强, 王海龙. 不同间作方式对谷子间作大豆群体结构的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(24): 37-40.
[14]	张继卫, 王玉凤, 张翼飞, 李庆, 杨克军, 唐子淳. 耕作方式对松嫩平原半干旱区玉米子粒灌浆特性及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(13): 26-30.
[15]	余长平, 周华平, 叶青松, 肖能武, 肖丽丽, 刘永忠, 秦光明. 玉米华玉11丰产、稳产、适应性分析及高产栽培技术[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(9): 15-19.

江汉平原大豆玉米带状复合种植模式优化与品种筛选

Optimization of strip intercropping patterns and variety screening for soybean and maize in the Jianghan Plain

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价