湖北农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (3): 7-8.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.03.002

• 专题:农业新质生产力研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新质生产力-乡村振兴的耦合协调发展与时空演化研究——以黄河流域55个地市为例

付景昊1, 张智舵2, 郑兵兵1, 许秀梅1   

  1. 1.青岛农业大学经济管理学院(合作社学院),山东 青岛 266109;
    2.上海交通大学设计学院,上海 200240
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-05 发布日期:2025-04-17
  • 通讯作者: 许秀梅(1978-),女,江苏徐州人,教授,博士,主要从事农业创新管理研究,(电子信箱)shareshareshare@163.com。
  • 作者简介:付景昊(1999-),男,山东滨州人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为农业创新管理,(电话)17865578865(电子信箱)2453540649@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    山东省社科规划研究专项(22CZTJ22); 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR202204020035)

Study on the coupled coordinated development and spatio-temporal evolution of new quality productivity-rural revitalization: Taking 55 cities in the Yellow River Basin as an example

FU Jing-hao1, ZHANG Zhi-duo2, ZHENG Bing-bing1, XU Xiu-mei1   

  1. 1. College of Economics and Management(College of Cooperatives), Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, Shandong, China;
    2. School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Received:2024-12-05 Online:2025-04-17

摘要: 基于2012—2021年黄河流域55个地市的面板数据,利用耦合协调度模型、探索性时空数据分析方法(ESTDA)和障碍度模型,揭示了黄河流域新质生产力-乡村振兴协调发展的时空演变规律。结果表明,①在时序变化上,2012—2021年,研究区新质生产力与乡村振兴的耦合协调度指数均值位于0.4~0.6,位于中度协调水平,且呈逐年上升趋势;在空间分布上,耦合协调水平由流域上游向中游、下游递增,多数地市耦合协调度水平逐年上升,但地市之间耦合协调度水平差异大。②时空动态分析表明,研究期内黄河流域新质生产力-乡村振兴耦合协调度的空间格局具有较高的相对稳定性,但空间格局演化的整合性较弱,地区间协同发展效应不明显;时空跃迁矩阵表明,研究期耦合协调度时空流动概率较低,二者协调发展水平存在跃迁惰性,短期内各地市间的局域协作格局较为固定。③障碍因子分析表明,研究期内科技创新能力、农村经济收入与乡村绿化问题逐渐成为制约黄河流域新质生产力与乡村振兴两个子系统发展的因素。为此,需要采取措施补齐地区发展短板,实现黄河流域新质生产力与乡村振兴的协调和可持续发展。

关键词: 新质生产力, 乡村振兴, 耦合协调, 时空演化, 黄河流域

Abstract: Based on the panel data from 55 cities in the Yellow River Basin from 2012 to 2021, the coupling coordination degree model, exploratory spatio-temporal data analysis (ESTDA) method, and obstacle degree model were used to reveal the spatio-temporal evolution patterns of the coordinated development between new quality productivity and rural revitalization in the Yellow River Basin. The results showed that, ① in terms of timing changes, from 2012 to 2021, the average coupling coordination degree index between new quality productivity and rural revitalization in the study area ranged from 0.4 to 0.6, indicating a moderate coordination level, with a yearly increasing trend. In terms of spatial distribution, the coupling coordination level increased from the upstream to the midstream and downstream areas of the basin. Most cities showed a yearly increase in the coupling coordination level, but significant differences existed among cities. ②Spatio-temporal dynamic analysis indicated that the spatial pattern of the coupling coordination degree between new quality productivity and rural revitalization in the Yellow River Basin remained relatively stable during the study period. However, the integration of spatial pattern evolution was weak, and the synergistic development effect among regions was not obvious. The spatio-temporal transition matrix indicated that the spatio-temporal mobility probability of the coupling coordination degree was low during the study period, with inertia in the coordinated development levels, resulting in a relatively fixed local collaboration pattern among cities in the short term. ③Obstacle factor analysis revealed that during the study period, technological innovation capability, rural economic income, and rural greening issues gradually became factors restricting the development of the two subsystems of new quality productivity and rural revitalization in the Yellow River Basin. Therefore, measures needed to be taken to address regional development shortcomings to achieve coordinated and sustainable development of new quality productivity and rural revitalization in the Yellow River Basin.

Key words: new quality productivity, rural revitalization, coupling and coordination, spatio-temporal evolution, Yellow River Basin

中图分类号: