Study on the evolution of symbiotic behavior pattern of multi-agents in tourism community governance：Taking Huzhu Tu Nationality Homeland Park in Qinghai province as an example

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.24.052

Abstract

Abstract: Based on symbiosis theory, this study took Huzhu Tu Nationality Homeland Park in Qinghai province as the case, selected government, enterprises, residents and tourists as the symbiotic main units, analyzed and discussed the symbiotic behavior pattern and evolution of multi-agents in tourism community governance through two field survey data. The results showed that,①there was a positive symbiotic relationship between different governance agents in 2012 and 2017; ② there were differences in the interaction and influence between different governance agents in the two periods; ③compared with 2012, the symbiotic correlation among government-enterprises, government-tourists, residents-enterprises and residents- tourists in 2017 was strengthened, the symbiotic correlation between government-residents and enterprises-tourists in 2017 was weaken; ④the symbiotic behavior pattern has evolved from the R-G-E-T pattern in 2012 to the E-R-G-T pattern in 2017.

Key words: community governance, multiple agents, symbiotic behavior pattern, evolution, Huzhu Tu Nationality Hometown Park

CLC Number:

F592.7

SHAO Li, TANG Zhong-xia, XIANG Cheng, REN Xi-xian, CHAI Jian. Study on the evolution of symbiotic behavior pattern of multi-agents in tourism community governance：Taking Huzhu Tu Nationality Homeland Park in Qinghai province as an example[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 59(24): 236-241.

References

[1] 孙九霞,史甜甜.旅游商业化的社区治理研究--以新疆喀纳斯社区为例[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,32(3):47-52.
[2] 刘艳,邹再进.旅游治理国内外研究综述[J].农村经济与科技,2017,28(1):94-97.
[3] MURPHY P E.Community driven tourism planning[J].Tourism management,1988,9(2):96-104.
[4] BRAMWELL B.Governance,the state and sustainable tourism: A political economy approach[J].Journal of sustainable tourism,2011,19(4-5):459-477.
[5] FOSSEN A V. Lafferty G .Contrasting models of land use regulation: Community,government and tourism development[J].Community development journal,2001,36(3):198-211.
[6] GÖYMEN K. Tourism and governance in Turkey[J].Annals of tourism research,2000,27(4):1025-1048.
[7] 乌铁红,陈田.旅游者与旅游地社区主体的旅游地意象感知差异分析--以内蒙古草原旅游地为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(1):203-208.
[8] 徐艳晴. 政府主导型旅游发展模式再审视:基于文献分析的视角[J].中国行政管理,2013(12):39-43.
[9] 徐莉,马阳,孙艳.旅游扶贫背景下民族社区治理的多元权力结构探究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2018,39(10):198-202.
[10] 黄爱莲. 分权与旅游治理:基于欠发达地区的实证分析[J]. 广西民族研究,2012(2):178-183.
[11] 王汝辉,刘旺.民族村寨旅游开发的内生困境及治理路径--基于资源系统特殊性的深层次考察[J].旅游科学,2009,23(3):1-5.
[12] 闵学勤. 精准治理视角下的特色小镇及其创建路径[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2016,27(5):55-60.
[13] 陈钢华. 旅游度假区的可持续发展--治理能力视角的思考[J].旅游学刊,2014,29(3):8-9.
[14] 葛继宏. 全域旅游治理的路径探索--以杭州淳安县为例[J].浙江社会科学,2017(03):142-147,160.
[15] 李嬴铭,宁永丽,黄潮.民族村寨旅游扶贫冲突与治理--以勾蓝瑶寨为例[J].广西民族研究,2018(6):148-153.
[16] 周永博,沈敏,吴建,等.迈向优质旅游:全域旅游供需错配及其治理--苏州吴江案例研究[J].旅游学刊,2018,33(6):36-48.
[17] MARGULIS L.Symbiosis in cell evolution[M].Germany Stuttgart:W.H.Freeman & Co Ltd,1981.
[18] 周慧玲. 旅游共生的研究述评[J].资源开发与市场,2014,30(9):1134-1137.
[19] 袁纯清. 共生理论--兼论小型经济[M].天津:经济科学出社,1998.
[20] 戴雄武. 深度开发湖泊资源,发挥多种功能效益--兼谈“千湖之省”的治湖战略[J].农业现代化研究,1988(6):34-36.
[21] 钟俊.共生:旅游发展的新思路[J].重庆师专学报,2001(3):17-19.
[22] 张俊英. 民族地区旅游产业与文化产业融合发展现状及对策--以青海互助县为例[J].大连民族大学学报,2017,19(2):130-133,148.
[23] 何梅青,胡凡.民族村寨传统文化利用与保护预警系统研究--以青海省互助县小庄村为例[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,37(2):71-78.
[24] 互助县政府. 2018年互助县人民政府工作报告[EB/OL].http://www.ahmhxc.com/gongzuobaogao/11022.html,2018-07-03.
[25] 唐仲霞,刘梦琳,向程,等.旅游社区治理多主体共生模式研究--基于青海省两个典型社区实例[J].人文地理,2018,33(6):125-131.
[26] 青海新闻网.深挖潜力提档升级,互助土族故土园打造国家5A级景区[EB/OL].http://www.sohu.com/a/27642000_115496,2015 -08-16.
[27] 李渊,赖晓霞,王德.基于居民空间利益分析的社区型景区提升策略--行为视角与鼓浪屿案例研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2017,33(3):120-127.