Field control effects of different insecticide application methods on the borers of ratoon sugarcane

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.20.011

Abstract

Abstract: In order to clarify the field control effects of different insecticide application methods on ratoon sugarcane borers, the field efficacy test of 30% chlorantraniliprole·thiamethoxam SC on ratoon cane borers with four different application methods including foliar spray, spraying cane stump, applying at soil furrow and drenching irrigation at cane stump were conducted in 2019 and 2020. The results showed that spraying cane stump had better efficacy on controlling sugarcane borers at the seedling and harvest stage of sugarcane, and could increase the number of effective cane stems and the yield of sugarcane. The average yield of sugarcane in two years increased by 29.46% compared with the control without any insecticide. There were significant differences on controlling sugarcane borers of foliar spay and spraying cane stump at seedling stage, while there were no significant differences at harvest stage. The average yield of sugarcane in two years of foliar spay and spraying cane stump increased by 15.58% and 9.08%, respectively, compared with the control without any insecticide. However, there was no significant difference in the yield of sugarcane between the treatment of applying at soil furrow to control borers and the control without any insecticide. According to the actual situation, drenching irrigation at cane stump, foliar spray and spraying cane stump could be used to prevent and control the ratoon sugarcane borers, and the effect of drenching irrigation at cane stump was the best.

Key words: ratoon sugarcane, sugarcane borers, insecticide application methods, control effect

CLC Number:

S482.3

LUO Ya-wei, QIN Zhen-qiang, LI De-wei, LIANG Tian, LI Tao, HUANG Xing, GAO Yi-jing. Field control effects of different insecticide application methods on the borers of ratoon sugarcane[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(20): 60-63.

References

[1] 覃振强,邓展云,黄冬发,等.几种杀虫剂防治甘蔗螟虫田间药效试验[J].广东农业科学,2012,39(16):72-74.
[2] 罗霆,黄有总,唐仕云,等.桂中蔗区甘蔗生长前期螟虫抗性评价[J].福建农业学报,2017,32(10):1135-1139.
[3] 李杨瑞. 现代甘蔗学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2010.313-333.
[4] 罗亚伟,梁阗,覃振强,等.专用缓释肥在宿根蔗上一次性施用的效果[J].亚热带农业研究,2020,16(2):73-77.
[5] 韦昌联. 广西蔗区新台糖22号种性退化现状分析及对策措施[J].南方农业学报,2012,43(12):2113-2117.
[6] 李文凤,尹炯,黄应昆,等.甘蔗螟虫为害损失研究[J].植物保护,2016,42(4):205-210.
[7] 罗亚伟,覃振强,梁阗,等. 30%度锐悬浮剂防治宿根蔗螟虫和绵蚜的田间药效试验[J].中国糖料,2015,37(1):28-30.
[8] 罗亚伟,王维赞,梁阗,等. 30%度锐悬浮剂防治宿根蔗螟虫的药效试验[J].广西蔗糖,2012(2):9-10.
[9] 杨世常,许三绵,蔺乔,等.甘蔗害虫防治试验初报[J].中国糖料,2015,37(2):47-48,50.
[10] 李言春,石红军,罗国玖,等.高效低毒农药防治甘蔗螟虫示范试验[J].中国糖料,2015,37(3):42-43.
[11] 杨绍聪,杨云伟,柴茂林,等.高效低毒农药防治甘蔗害虫试验[J].中国糖料,2014(1):46-47.
[12] 黄卫,李仕龙,玉子应,等.几种新型杀虫剂对甘蔗产量和品质性状的影响及对甘蔗螟虫的防治效果[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(35):13566-13567.
[13] 薛晶,罗志明,张会华,等.3种杀虫剂防治甘蔗害虫试验初报[J].中国糖料,2013(1):38-39,41.
[14] 伍彩云,孙涛,李艳芳,等.30%度锐悬浮剂及40%福戈水分散粒剂防治甘蔗害虫药效研究[J].现代农业科技,2013(16):94-95.
[15] 梁阗,方锋学,罗亚伟,等. 30%度锐悬浮剂防治甘蔗螟虫药效试验[J].广东农业科学,2012,39(2):72-73.
[16] 刘暮莲,黄向荣,陈富启.几种药剂对甘蔗螟虫的防治效果探究[J].广西植保,2015,27(2):27-28.
[17] 周浩承,欧宗喜.不同杀虫剂防治甘蔗螟虫的效果比较[J].广西糖业,2018(3):12-15.
[18] 刘为林,胡平华,康宏波.农药的科学施用方法[J].现代农业科技,2016(7):134-135.
[19] 伍苏然,杨乃博,杨本鹏,等.甘蔗螟虫综合防治技术研究进展[J].热带生物学报,2013,4(3):289-295.
[20] 杨世常,夏银果,陈寿宏,等.20%康宽悬浮剂防治甘蔗螟虫田间药效试验总结[J].甘蔗糖业,2010(2):14-19.
[21] 张梅凤,范金勇,张宏伟,等.新烟碱类杀虫剂的研究进展[J].世界农药,2009(1):22-25,52.
[22] 陶贤鉴,黄超群,罗亮明,等.新一代烟碱类杀虫剂—噻虫嗪的合成研究[J].现代农药,2006,5(1):11-13.
[23] 周至宏,王助引,陈可才.甘蔗病虫鼠草防治彩色图志[M].南宁:广西科学技术出版社,1998.78-831.
[24] 陈文耀. 广西甘蔗栽培[M].南宁:广西科学技术出版社,1991.334-341.