Preliminary research on evaluation index system for comprehensive potential of natural resources in China

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.09.004

Abstract

Abstract: Taking into account the administrative management requirements for unified and classified natural resources, the development potential of land, forest, grassland, wetland and water resources was evaluated based on resource attributes, natural conditions and disaster risk. On this basis, a systematic, reasonable and objective evaluation index system for comprehensive potential of natural resources was constructed. Combining multiple statistical data and remote sensing data, the comprehensive potential of natural resources of Chinese provincial-level regions was evaluated, and potential zoning was conducted using the dominant factor method. The empirical results showed that the western region, the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and the northeast had high comprehensive potential of natural resources; and regions with low comprehensive potential of natural resources such as Beijing and Tianjin needed to leverage their economic development advantages. The evaluation index system for the comprehensive potential of natural resource proposed in this study was applicable to the evaluation of natural resource development potential in regions of different scales, and could effectively identify the types of superior natural resources in regions, which provided support for local natural resource management and optimization adjustment of main functional areas.

Key words: natural resources, comprehensive potential, potential evaluation, indicator system, unified management, China

CLC Number:

F062.1

DING Shou-yi, JIA Qi-qi, LI Qing-jia, LIU Ze-jin. Preliminary research on evaluation index system for comprehensive potential of natural resources in China[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 63(9): 15-21.

References

[1] KLINGEBIEL A A M P H. Landcapability classification[M]. State of New Jersey: Soil conservation service, 1961.
[2] FAO. A framework for land evaluation[M]. Rome, Italy: FAO, 1976.
[3] 张刚. 负债表制度下的门头沟区耕地质量等级评价与现状分析[J].安徽农学通报, 2020,26(20):119-122.
[4] 袁政祥,王祎,蔡立群.基于GIS的凉州区耕地生产潜力评价[J].甘肃农业科技, 2013(4):3-5.
[5] 黄志蕾, 朱纹君, 齐善忠.近30年黄河下游城市后备可利用土地资源时空演变分析——以济南市为例[J].水土保持研究, 2022,29(5):276-282.
[6] 姜蓝齐, 张丽娟, 赵慧颖, 等.松嫩平原自然宜垦性及耕地后备资源开发潜力[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(10):15-25.
[7] WU Z, ZHANG Z, WANG J.Estimating the productive potential of five natural forest types in northeastern China[J]. Forest ecosystems, 2019,6(4):42.
[8] 刘智军, 朱丽艳, 吴恒, 等.基于清查数据的立地质量评价方法准确性分析[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2019,39(5):127-135.
[9] 陈铭捷, 陈敏, 刘萍.基于森林资源连续清查数据的广东桉树人工林立地质量评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022,50(11):61-69.
[10] SUHARTANTO B, WIDODO S, KUSTANTINAH,et al. Potential of forage production on dry land agriculture with mixed cropping pattern[J]. IOP conference series:Earth and environmental science, 2019,387(1):12061.
[11] 陈乐乐, 施建军, 王彦龙, 等.高寒地区不同退化程度草地群落结构特征研究[J].草地学报, 2016,24(1):210-213.
[12] 贾嵘, 沈冰.水资源可持续开发利用与管理研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2001,29(4):85-89.
[13] 欧阳志云, 王如松.生态系统服务功能、生态价值与可持续发展[J].世界科技研究与发展, 2000(5):45-50.
[14] ZHU L, CHEN Y, GONG H, et al.Economic value evaluation of wetland service in Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve, Beijing[J]. Chinese geographical science, 2011,21(6):744-752.
[15] 吕建树,刘洋.黄河三角洲湿地生态旅游资源开发潜力评价[J].湿地科学, 2010,8(4):339-346.
[16] 李岩, 王珂, 才琪, 等.浙江省县域森林生态承载力评价及时空演变分析[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(3):554-564.
[17] 余建忠, 董翊明, 田园, 等.基于自然资源整合的浙江省全域土地综合整治路径研究[J].规划师, 2021,37(22):17-23.
[18] 袁开升, 何太蓉.秦巴山区县域资源环境综合承载力动态评价研究——以重庆市城口县为例[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022,39(4):51-60.
[19] 秦琴, 黄佺, 黄瑞祥, 等.生态文明背景下滇西北体育旅游资源开发潜力评价及空间特征[J].生态经济, 2020,36(7):131-139.
[20] 赵媛媛,何春阳,李晓兵,等.干旱化与土地利用变化对中国北方草地与农牧交错带耕地自然生产潜力的综合影响评价[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(1):123-135.
[21] 王雪军,张煜星,黄国胜,等.赣州市林地质量评价及生产潜力研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2014,36(5):1159-1166.
[22] 红梅,吴海珍,赵萌莉.基于GIS的内蒙古草地牧草生产潜力评价研究——以正镶白旗为例[J].草业与畜牧, 2014(2):18-23.
[23] 吕建树,刘洋,张祖陆,等.鲁北滨海湿地生态旅游资源开发潜力评价及开发策略[J].资源科学,2011,33(9):1788-1798.
[24] 秦大庸,罗翔宇,陈晓军,等.西北干旱区水资源开发利用潜力分析[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(2):143-150.