Exploration of the reasons for the large difference in hydraulic parameters of red soil in Yunnan Province

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.12.005

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the reasons for the large difference in the hydraulic parameters of red soil between Yunnan Province and the surrounding areas, the basic hydraulic parameters of red soil were measured by sampling in undisturbed soil farmland and farmland after land leveling. At the same time, a two-hour field surface drip irrigation infiltration test was carried out. The soil profile was divided into four layers of 0~15 cm, 15~25 cm, 25~40 cm and 40~55 cm. Based on the Kosugi empirical model of HYDRUS-1D model, different inversion models were constructed to analyze the effects of these methods on soil hydraulic parameters. In order to ensure the convergence of the inversion model under field conditions, the contact radius of the emitter was assumed to be in the range of （1.0 ± 0.2） cm, which was calibrated by the trial and error method, and the conditions with the highest accuracy were selected for subsequent analysis. The results showed that the simulation accuracy of the inversion model was the highest when the irrigation flow rate of 0.84 L/h was calibrated by the trial and error method, the contact radius of the emitter was 0.9 cm and the constant flux of the upper boundary was 2.75 cm/min, and the R² was 0.926 18, the AIC value was -65.62, and BIC value was -62.04. The inversion method suitable for red soil in the field was that the fitting parameters were inverted by fixing the measured saturated water content, residual water content and saturated hydraulic conductivity of each layered soil. In view of the fact that the surface layer of red soil would form a water blocking layer during drip irrigation in the field, the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the surface soil also needed to be inverted. In addition, this study found that the undisturbed red soil in Yunnan Province had high water retention and strong water permeability due to factors such as geography, ultraviolet radiation, and dry and wet season climate. However, sampling of farmland after soil leveling or inversion based on inaccurate soil parameters through numerical models might lead to the conclusion that red soil had poor water retention and permeability.

Key words: red soil, soil hydraulic parameters, parameter inversion, surface drip irrigation, numerical simulation, Yunnan Province

CLC Number:

S152.7

WANG Ying, LI Chong-qing, LIU Qing-sheng, LU Qi-ling. Exploration of the reasons for the large difference in hydraulic parameters of red soil in Yunnan Province[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 63(12): 24-30.

References

[1] 付晓莉. 土壤水分特征曲线测定过程中的压实效应研究[D]. 陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.
[2] 廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,等.杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2022,55(8):1546-1556.
[3] 叶瀛韬,李占玲,王蕙.不同含量砾石嵌套对红壤入渗特性的影响[J]. 节水灌溉,2022(5):1-6.
[4] 张川,张玉锴,李淑芳,等.干湿交替下木纤维重构红壤的水力特性分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(8):103-110.
[5] 聂可祎,吴治康,刘继超.不同土地利用条件下红壤持水能力研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2022,50(18):64-67.
[6] 靳泽文. 生物质炭与氮肥配施对旱地红壤土壤肥力主控因素及作物产量的持续影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2019.
[7] 余杨,杨振杰,张建生,等.不同根部微灌水器对云南红壤和黄沙土水分分布的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2015,31(19):84-90,315.
[8] 黄凯,蔡德所,潘伟,等.广西赤红壤甘蔗田间滴灌带合理布设参数确定[J]. 农业工程学报,2015,31(11):136-143.
[9] 冷暖. 南亚热带赤红壤团聚体稳定性及其降雨溅蚀响应[D]. 南宁:广西大学,2022.
[10] TOMASELLA J,HODNETT M G, ROSSATO L.Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of soil water retention in brazilian soils[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2000, 64:327-338.
[11] ELNESR M N, ALAZBA A A.Computational evaluations of HYDRUS simulations of drip irrigation in 2D and 3D domains (i-Surface drippers)[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture,2019,162: 189-205.
[12] 李美婷,武红旗,蒋平安,等.利用土壤的近红外光谱特征测定土壤含水量[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析,2012,32(8): 2117-2121.
[13] 徐俊增,刘玮璇,卫琦,等.基于HYDRUS-2D的负压微润灌土壤水分运动模拟[J]. 农业机械学报,2021,52(8): 287-296.
[14] 涂安国,聂小飞,李英,等.层状红壤水分入渗特征试验与模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2021,39(12):1243-1249.
[15] 彭建平,邵爱军.基于Matlab方法确定VG模型参数[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2006(6):25-28.
[16] 石文豪,李奇,韩琼,等.基于不同优化算法的土壤水分特征曲线模型模拟性能分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2020, 31(4):157-165.
[17] SIMUNEK J.The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the movement of water,heat,and multiple solutes in variably saturated media[M]. California: University of California Riverside,2013.
[18] AL-OGAIDI A J M, WAYAYOK A, ROWSHON M K, et al. Wetting patterns estimation under drip irrigation systems using an enhanced empirical model[J]. Agricultural water management, 2016, 176: 203-213.
[19] 樊贵盛,党志良.土壤间歇入渗特性的大田试验研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,1992(4):56-61.
[20] 俞明涛,张科峰.基于HYDRUS-2D软件的土壤水力特征参数反演及间接地下滴灌的土壤水分运动模拟[J]. 浙江农业学报,2019,31(3):458-468.
[21] YANG C X, LI J, SHI C D, et al.Effect of light on soil microstructure and soil elements[J]. Journal of physics: Conference series, 2020, 1549(2):022084.
[22] 潘剑君. 我国南方第四纪红色粘土低丘红壤的保水性能研究初报[J]. 南京农业大学学报,1991(3):122-123.
[23] ABID M, LAL R.Tillage and drainage impact on soil quality: Ⅱ. Tensile strength of aggregates, moisture retention and water infiltration[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2009, 103(2): 364-372.
[24] 吴杨,邵伟,马燮铫,等.云南西双版纳热带季雨林土壤水分运动模拟及参数变化特征[J]. 水文,2021,41(5):59-64.
[25] 高跃. 基于HYDRUS模型的红壤坡耕地水分动态研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2013.
[26] 艾天成,李方敏,万健民,等.不同有机肥对土地平整后土壤肥力及水稻生育的影响[J]. 湖北农学院学报,2002(3):206-209.
[27] 范王涛. 土地整治项目对渭北台塬区土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 粮食科技与经济,2020,45(3):142-144.
[28] 云南省人民政府门户网站. 2023年云南夏粮生产再获丰收EB/OL]. (2023-07-27])[2023-09-20]. https://www.yn.gov.cn/sjfb/sjtj/202307/t20230727_267101.html.
[29] 陈云芬.云麦114刷新我国西南麦区小麦单产纪录[N]. 云南日报,2022-06-09(001).
[30] 云南网.昭通小麦单产提升样板区测产结束平均亩产370公斤[EB/OL]. (2024-04-16)[2023-09-20]. https://zhaotong.yunnan.cn/system/2024/04/16/033014603.shtml.
[31] 新华网. 依法合规科学利用好“坡耕地”——全国农技中心、耕地质量中心负责人就“水稻上山”等话题答记者问[EB/OL]. (2023-06-24)[2023-09-20]. http://www.news.cn/fortune/2023-06/24/c_1129714224.htm.