Correlation analysis of tobacco leaf appearance quality and sensory coziness

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.23.024

Abstract

Abstract: In order to study the effect of tobacco appearance quality on sensory comfort, simple correlation analysis and typical correlation analysis were used to analyze the appearance quality and sensory comfort evaluation data of 170 representative tobacco samples from 16 flue-cured tobacco growing provinces in the five major tobacco regions of my country. The results indicated that there were wide variations in the appearance quality of 170 selected samples, and the sensory comfort evaluation results were generally in line with the normal distribution; The results of simple correlation analysis showed that the color, flexibility, gloss intensity , thickness, resilience and total score in the appearance quality were extremely significantly positively related to the following sensory characterisitcs,i.e.,sweetness, clear, smooth, mellow, alcohol, clean, refreshing, moist and total sensory score; The results of the typical correlation analysis and the simple correlation analysis are basically the same, but mainly the correlation between the thickness, color and resilience in sensory comfort index is very significant. In a word, the color, thickness and resilience of tobacco leaf are very important for sensory comfort.

Key words: tobacco leaf, appearance quality, sensory coziness, correlation analysis

CLC Number:

S572

YAN Tie-jun, MA Jun-tao, LIU Wen-feng, XU Zi-cheng, ZHOU Hong-shen, PANG Zhe, PAN Ting-ting, WANG Lin, SHAO Hui-fang. Correlation analysis of tobacco leaf appearance quality and sensory coziness[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 60(23): 109-113.

References 26

[1]	胡战军,马林,程昌新,等.烤烟外观质量与感官评吸指标间的关系分析[J].云南农业大学学报,2011,26(6):809-814.
[2]	梁洪波,李念胜,元建,等.烤烟烟叶颜色与内在品质的关系[J].中国烟草科学,2002,23(1):9-11.
[3]	王欣. 湖北烟区烤烟质量综合评价及与国内外优质烤烟的差异分析[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2008.
[4]	邓国宾,曾晓鹰,薛红芬,等.烤烟香味成分与其感官质量的典型相关分析[J].中国烟草科学,2011,32(5):14-19.
[5]	潘义宏,李佳佳,蒋美欣,等. 烟叶外观质量、常规化学成分与其感官质量的典型相关分析[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(10):384-388.
[6]	黄清芬,张延军.烟叶评吸质量与外观质量的相关性分析[J].江西农业学报,2011,23(11):89-90.
[7]	彭友兵. 烤烟外观质量与感官质量的灰色关联分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2014,42(7):2116-2117.
[8]	王欣,毕庆文,许自成,等.湖北烟区烤烟质量综合评价及典型相关分析[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2007,22(5):27-32.
[9]	沈利臣,卢晓华,刘元德,等. 不同烟区烟叶外观质量与其感官评吸质量的关系分析[J].安徽农学通报,2019,25(17):34-37.
[10]	闫克玉,赵献章. 烟叶分级[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003. 111-116.
[11]	蔡宪杰,王信民,尹启生.成熟度与烟叶质量的量化关系研究[J].中国烟草学报,2005,11(4):42-46.
[12]	尹启生,陈江华,王信民,等. 2002年度全国烟叶质量评价分析[J].中国烟草学报,2003(增刊):59-70.
[13]	杨立均. 河南省不同产烟区烟叶质量评价[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学,2003.
[14]	于川芳,李晓红,罗登山,等. 玉溪烤烟外观质量因素与其主要化学成分之间的关系[J].烟草科技,2005(1):5-7.
[15]	ENZELL C R,WAHLBERG I.Leaf composition in relation to smoking quality and aroma[J]. Rec Adv Tob Sci,1980(6):64-122.
[16]	于建军,章新军,毕庆文,等. 烤烟烟叶理化特性对烟气烟碱、CO、焦油量的影响[].中国烟草科学,2003,24(3):5-8.
[17]	闰克玉,袁志永,吴殿信. 烤烟质量评价指标体系研究[J].郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版),2001,16(4):58-61.
[18]	蔡宪杰,王信民,尹启生.烤烟外观质量指标量化分析初探[J].烟草科技,2004(6):37-39,42.
[19]	闫洪洋,闫洪喜,吉松毅,等.河南烤烟外观质量与感官质量的相关性[J].烟草科技,2012(7):17-23.
[20]	斯童. 叩开现代统计分析的大门──评《现代统计分析知识与写作》[J].江苏统计,2018(10):47,43.
[21]	史松奇.试析现代统计分析方法及其应用[J].科技经济导刊,2019(36):177,179.
[22]	王竞, 顾毓敏, 徐天养,等. 烤烟外观质量与其感官评吸质量关系研究[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(3):131-133.
[23]	KELLEY W T, DANEHOWER D A, BOWMAN D T.A color scale for rapid measurement of relative pigment concentation in burley tobacco leaves[J]. Tobacco international,1990(34):22-24.
[24]	程占省. 烟叶分级工[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2001. 393-406.
[25]	王卫康. 《烤烟》国标中分级因素的概念及把握[J].烟草科技,2004(5):44-48.
[26]	朱尊权. 烟叶分级和烟草生产技术的改革(一)[J].烟草科技, 1990(3):3-8.