湖北农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (6): 28-32.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.06.006

• 育种·栽培 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同栽培模式下小麦养分生产效率及土壤环境风险

叶灵1, 相殿国2, 苗锋1, 纪明妹1, 刘珊1, 王胜蕊1   

  1. 1.沧州市农林科学院,河北 沧州 061001;
    2.南皮县农业农村局,河北 沧州 061500
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-20 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-07-18
  • 通讯作者: 王胜蕊(1986-),女,河北南皮人,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事作物育种研究,(电子信箱)wangshengrui317@163.com。
  • 作者简介:叶 灵(1984-),女,河北青县人,农艺师,硕士,主要从事土壤环境质量研究,(电子信箱)512623808@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    沧州市农林科学院青年基金项目(202007)

Nutrient production efficiency of wheat and soil environmental risk under different cultivation patterns

YE Ling1, XIANG Dian-guo2, MIAO Feng1, JI Ming-mei1, LIU Shan1, WANG Sheng-rui1   

  1. 1. Cangzhou Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Cangzhou 061001, Hebei, China;
    2. Agriculture and Rural Bureau of Nanpi Country, Cangzhou 061500, Hebei, China
  • Received:2024-09-20 Published:2025-06-25 Online:2025-07-18

摘要: 为使河北省平原地区小麦的水肥投入得到高效利用,设置4种栽培管理模式,分别为处理A(当地农民习惯管理,N 266 kg/hm2、P2O5 200 kg/hm2,总灌水量300 mm)、处理B(高产推荐管理,N 220 kg/hm2、P2O5 152 kg/hm2、K2O 150 kg/hm2,总灌水量195 mm)、处理C(水肥高投入管理,N 300 kg/hm2、P2O5 225 kg/hm2、K2O 300 kg/hm2,总灌水量270 mm)、处理D(水肥高效管理,N 270 kg/hm2、P2O5 184 kg/hm2、K2O 270 kg/hm2,总灌水量215 mm),通过测定产量和养分利用率确定最佳栽培模式。结果表明,处理C和处理D的产量分别为 9 881、10 360 kg/hm2,显著高于处理A(P<0.05),比处理A分别增产20.2%、26.0%;处理C和处理D的植株养分含量均高于处理A和处理B,而子粒对养分的需求量未随产量的增加而上升。处理D的土壤硝态氮累积量为43.15 kg/hm2,低于处理B和处理C,表明氮素有效转移至植株,降低了淋溶风险。综合考虑产量、水肥投入及环境风险,认为处理D为可行的高产栽培模式。

关键词: 小麦(Triticum aestivum L.), 水肥效率, 栽培模式, 养分生产效率, 土壤硝态氮, 土壤环境风险

Abstract: In order to make efficient use of water and fertilizer inputs for wheat in the plain area of Hebei Province, four cultivation management patterns were set up, including treatment A (customary management of local farmers: N application rate of 266 kg/hm2, P2O5 of 200 kg/hm2,with a total irrigation amount of 300 mm), treatment B (recommended management of high yield: N application rate of 220 kg/hm2, P2O5 of 152 kg/hm2, K2O of 150 kg/hm2, with a total irrigation amount of 195 mm), treatment C (high input management of water and fertilizer: N application rate of 300 kg/hm2, P2O5 of 225 kg/hm2, K2O of 300 kg/hm2, with a total irrigation amount of 270 mm), and treatment D (efficient management of water and fertilizer: N application rate of 270 kg/hm2, P2O5 of 184 kg/hm2, K2O of 270 kg/hm2, with a total irrigation amount of 215 mm), and the optimal cultivation pattern was determined by measuring the yield and nutrient utilization efficiency. The results showed that the yields of treatment C and treatment D were significantly higher than those of treatment A(P<0.05), reaching 9 881 kg/hm2 and 10 360 kg/hm2, respectively, which increased by 20.2% and 26.0% compared with treatment A. The nutrient content of plants under treatments C and D was higher than that under treatments A and B, while the nutrient demand of grain did not increase along with the yield. The accumulation of soil nitrate nitrogen under treatment D was 43.15 kg/hm2, which was lower than that under treatments B and C, indicating that nitrogen had been effectively transferred to plants and the risk of leaching was reduced. Considering the yield, water and fertilizer input, and environmental risks, it was suggested that the treatment D could be used as a feasible high-yield cultivation pattern.

Key words: wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), water and fertilizer efficiency, cultivation pattern, nutrient production efficiency, soil nitrate nitrogen, soil environmental risk

中图分类号: