Study of the suitability and supporting technology of high ridge and plastic film mulching technology for flue-cured tobacco in Chenzhou city

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.08.021

Abstract

Abstract: Using the low ridge and no plastic film mulching as control, high ridge and plastic film mulching as treatment, the suitability of high ridge and plastic film mulching technology in tobacco-growing area in Chenzhou city was investigated, the suitable transplanting period and depth was found. Two factors, transplanting time and transplanting depth, each with three gradients, were used to compare the agronomic characters, economic benefits, chemical composition, coordination and sensory evaluation quality of tobacco leaves in each experimental area at maturity by using the randomized block experiment. The results show that the high ridge and plastic film mulching technology can ensure the normal growth of tobacco plants under normal or dry climate. The agronomic traits, economic benefits, chemical components, coordination and sensory evaluation of tobacco plants with high ridge and plastic film mulching are better than the control tobacco plants. High ridge and plastic film mulching technology is suitable for tobacco-growing area in Chenzhou city. The yield and quality of tobacco would be the best by using D2S3 treatment （transplanting period is March 16, transplanting depth 20 cm）.

Key words: flue-cured tobacco, high ridge and plastic film mulching, transplanting period, transplanting depth, Chenzhou city

CLC Number:

S572

YANG Yang, ZHANG Shi-zhou, WAN Ding-hai, LIU Bi-rong, LIAO Jian-song, JIANG Chao-qiang, GONG Shuang, WU You-xiang. Study of the suitability and supporting technology of high ridge and plastic film mulching technology for flue-cured tobacco in Chenzhou city[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 59(8): 93-98.

References

[1] 罗登山,王兵,乔学义. 《全国烤烟烟叶香型风格区划》解析[J]. 中国烟草学报,2019,25(4):1-9.
[2] 匡传富. 湖南郴州植烟区气候特征及适宜性评价[J]. 现代农业科学,2019(17):284-286.
[3] 邝莎莉,谭必旺,范桉吉,等. 湖南省郴州市近60a雨季气候特征的分析与研究[J]. 北京农业,2016(1):141-142.
[4] 容开定. 郴州市气候资源与气象服务在烤烟生产上的分析[J]. 耕作与栽培,2013(6):59-60.
[5] 匡传富. 湖南郴州植烟区耕地状况分析及对策[J]. 湖南农业科学,2010(15):59-61.
[6] 王振坤,金文华,张保占,等. 烤烟起垄栽培技术[J]. 烟草科技,1987(4):31-32,27.
[7] 袁家富,毕庆文,彭成林,等. 黔北旱地烤烟适宜起垄高度研究[J]. 湖北农业科学,2008,47(10):1179-1182.
[8] 夏海乾,杜德强,冯焕华,等. 不同起垄方式及覆膜对烤烟生长发育和产质的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学,2007,35(6):74-76.
[9] 张敏,张四平,陆坤. 烤烟种植适宜起垄高度与施肥方式研究[J]. 作物研究,2015,29(1):42-46.
[10] 陈振国,杨艳华,李进平,等. 不同垄作覆盖方式对烤烟根际环境及产量影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2012,31(3):135-138.
[11] 袁文彬,宗钊辉,谢晋,等. 高垄和膜下移栽对烤烟田间成熟度及产质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2018,46(27):45-49.
[12] 蔡奇. 起垄方式和种植密度对烤烟生长及烟叶产量、质量的影响研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学,2009.
[13] 李伟,陆魁东,周清明,等. 湖南烤烟适宜移栽期分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,38(2):135-139.
[14] 樊芬,刘泓翔,王建波,等. 适期早栽和追肥前移对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学,2016(10):32-36,40.
[15] 杨晃. 移栽期和移栽方式对靖州县烤烟生长发育和产质量的影响[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学,2016.
[16] 张炜. 烤烟井窖式移栽的适宜深度和播栽期研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学,2015.
[17] 高卫锴,徐岩,刘海业,等. 移栽深度及覆膜和培土方式对烤烟产质量形成的影响[J]. 作物研究,2018,32(1):35-41.
[18] YC/T 159-2002,烟草及烟草制品水溶性糖的测定连续流动法[S].
[19] YC/T 468-2013,烟草及烟草制品总植物碱的测定连续流动(硫氰酸钾)法[S].
[20] YC/T 161-2002,烟草及烟草制品总氮的测定连续流动法[S].
[21] YC/T 217-2007,烟草及烟草制品钾的测定连续流动法[S].
[22] YC/T 162-2002,烟草及烟草制品氯的测定连续流动法[S].
[23] 王彦亭,谢剑平,李志宏,等. 中国烟草种植区划[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009.
[24] YC/T 138-1998,烟草及烟草制品感官评价方法[S].
[25] 杨洋,彭黔荣,张晓敏,等. 卷烟原料的感官质量与化学成分的关系研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2018,9(20):5416-5422.
[26] 孙梦媛,刘景辉,赵宝平,等. 全膜垄作对旱作马铃薯土壤含水率、酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2017,36(4):1-8.
[27] 周建云,钱晓刚,朱晓伟. 不同垄作措施与烤烟生长研究I对农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报,2007,26(3):193-197.
[28] 夏海乾. 贵州优质烟叶氮素调控技术研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学,2006.
[29] 孙敏,黎娟,周清明,等. 湖南浓香型烤烟常规化学成与外观质量关系分析[J]. 天津农业科学,2016,22(1):101-105.
[30] 苏德成,王元英,王树声,等. 中国烟草栽培学[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005.
[31] 刘青丽. 土壤供氮特征及其对烤烟氮素营养的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2009.
[32] 李广才,余玉梅,胡建军,等. 湖南烤烟主要化学成分与评吸质量的非线性关系解析[J]. 中国烟草学报,2012,18(4):17-26.