Research on the evaluation and influencing factors of regional eco-efficiency in Dabie Mountain：Based on the perspective of digital economy

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.09.038

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the panel data of 47 counties in Dabei Mountain area from 2011 to 2020, the SBM model, ML index and its decomposition index were used to calculate and evaluate the static efficiency and dynamic efficiency, and the Tobit model was used to analyze the influencing factors. The results showed that the ecological static efficiency of Dabie Mountain showed an increasing trend and differentiated development characteristics. The ecological dynamic efficiency of Dabie Mountain showed a fluctuating growth trend, which was mainly due to the gain effect of technological progress. Digital economy, green innovation, economic development, industrial structure and environmental regulation promoted the improvement of ecological efficiency, while energy consumption and population size were inhibiting factors. Therefore, it was necessary to make good use of digital technology to enable ecological protection and tackle key problems of green and low-carbon technology; improve regional environmental regulations and foster new driving forces for green development; promote high-quality development of the regional economy and accelerate the green transformation of the industrial structure.

Key words: ecological efficiency, digital economy, Dabie Mountain area, superefficiency SBM-ML index, Tobit model

CLC Number:

F124.5

XING Yu, XIA Qing-li, ZHANG Ming-ru, XIAO Xiang-xia, CHANG Tian-tian. Research on the evaluation and influencing factors of regional eco-efficiency in Dabie Mountain：Based on the perspective of digital economy[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 63(9): 227-233.

References

[1] 黄小勇,查育新.绿色发展效率的测度评价与驱动因素研究——以长江经济带为例[J].价格理论与实践,2022(6):7-11,42.
[2] 何弦佳. 我国环境治理效率评估及其影响因素分析[D].广州:广东省社会科学院,2021.
[3] 翁异静,汪夏彤,陈思静.浙江三大城市群绿色发展效率时空分异及影响机理[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(2):509-516.
[4] 邓霞. 区域生态效率评价研究——以长江经济带为例[J].价格理论与实践,2019(11):133-137.
[5] 张展,廖小平,李春华,等.湖南省县域农业生态效率的时空特征及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2022,42(2):181-189.
[6] 刘传明. 环境信息公开对绿色发展效率的影响效应研究[J].山东财经大学学报,2021,33(5):25-42.
[7] 何维达,温家隆,张满银.数字经济发展对中国绿色生态效率的影响研究——基于双向固定效应模型[J].经济问题,2022(1):1-8,30.
[8] 梁琦,肖素萍,李梦欣.数字经济发展提升了城市生态效率吗?——基于产业结构升级视角[J].经济问题探索,2021(6):82-92.
[9] 刘习平,管可.湖北长江经济带绿色发展效率测度与评价[J].统计与决策,2018,34(18):103-106.
[10] 黄萍,于海翔.基于SBM-Malmquist模型的江苏省绿色经济效率特征分析[J].经营与管理,2020(12):123-127.
[11] 刘健,刘鸿福,姚西龙.我国煤炭产业绿色发展效率研究[J].工业技术经济,2015,34(10):145-150.
[12] 杨楠. 江苏省绿色发展效率及影响因素研究[D].南京:中共江苏省委党校,2018.
[13] 田光辉,李江苏,苗长虹,等.基于非期望产出的中国城市绿色发展效率及影响因素分析[J].经济地理,2022,42(6):83-91.
[14] 罗良文,张万里.区域绿色技术创新效率对生态效率的影响分析[J].湖北社会科学,2017(3):69-78.
[15] 顾典,徐小晶.中国产业结构优化升级对生态效率的影响[J].生态经济,2020,36(6):58-67.
[16] 于连超,孙帆,毕茜,等.环境保护费改税有助于提升企业产能利用率吗?-来自《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验证据[J].上海财经大学学报,2021,23(4):32-47.
[17] 郭峰,王靖一,王芳,等.测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征[J].经济学(季刊),2020,19(4):1401-1418.
[18] 傅春,欧阳欢蕤,赵雪茹.基于DEA及Malmquist指数模型的江西省绿色发展效率测度与评价[J].生态经济,2020,36(6):51-57,172.
[19] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020,36(10):65-76.
[20] 刘军,杨渊鋆,张三峰.中国数字经济测度与驱动因素研究[J].上海经济研究,2020(6):81-96.
[21] 钱振华,成刚.数据包络分析SBM超效率模型无可行解问题的两阶段求解法[J].数学的实践与认识,2013,43(5):171-178.
[22] TONE K,TSUTSUI M.An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA-A third pole of technical efficiency[J].European journal of operational research,2010(3):1554-1563.
[23] 周杰文,蒋正云,李凤.长江经济带绿色经济发展及影响因素研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(12):47-53,69.
[24] CHUNG Y H, FARE R, GROSSKOPF S.Productivity and undesirable outputs:A directional distance function approach[J].Journal of environmental management, 1997, 51(3):229-240.
[25] 罗宣,金瑶瑶,王翠翠.转型升级下资源型城市绿色发展效率研究——以中部地区为例[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(6):77-83.
[26] 刘青利,夏彩瑞,张曼.河南省工业绿色发展效率测算及影响因素研究[J].信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),2021,34(3):394-400.
[27] 范正根,邓志康,张普伟,等.生态文明试验区绿色发展效率测度及其影响机理[J].统计与决策,2022,38(5):75-79.