Yield performance and economic benefits of facility morel under different fertilization types

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.02.011

Abstract

Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of different fertilization treatments on the yield and economic benefits of morel[Morchella esculenta （L.） Pers.], no fertilization was set as the control group, and humic acid bio organic fertilizer （10 000 kg/hm²）, organic enzyme fertilizer （10 000 kg/hm²）, peat （5 000 kg/hm²）, and plant ash （5 000 kg/hm²） were used as the experimental groups. The yield and morphological characteristics of morel fruiting bodies were measured, and their economic benefits and yield input ratio were calculated. The results showed that the yield （dry weight） of morel fruiting bodies in different fertilization treatments from high to low was peat （1 335.38 kg/hm²）, plant ash （1 170.54 kg/hm²）, control （1 096.03 kg/hm²）, organic enzyme fertilizer （881.62 kg/hm²）, and humic acid bio organic fertilizer （855.49 kg/hm²）. The yield of morel was significantly increased in the treatment of peat and plant ash, and the overall performance of morel in peat treatment was better than that in plant ash treatment. However, the yield of morel decreased instead of increasing in organic enzyme fertilizer and humic acid bio organic fertilizer treatment. Compared with the control treatment, the yield （dry weight） of morel treated with peat increased by 21.84%, the total output value increased by 21.84%, the economic benefits increased by 24.29%, and the production to investment ratio increased by 5.85%. Applying peat was beneficial for increasing the yield and economic benefits of morel.

Key words: morel[Morchella esculenta （L.） Pers.], fertilization types, yield, economic benefits

CLC Number:

S646

DU Can, WANG Feng, LI Ying-tao, WANG Yu-peng. Yield performance and economic benefits of facility morel under different fertilization types[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2025, 64(2): 69-74.

References

[1] 朱永乐, 高梦祥. 羊肚菌的栽培、液体发酵及开发利用研究进展[J]. 中国食用菌,2022, 41(11): 1-7.
[2] 么越,荣丹,唐梦瑜,等. 羊肚菌药用价值及产品开发现状[J]. 中国食用菌,2022, 41(7):13-17,21.
[3] ROTZOLL N, DUNKEL R, HOFMANN T.Quantitative studies, taste reconstitution, and omission experiments on the key taste compounds in morel mushrooms (Morchella deliciosa Fr.). Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2006, 54(7):2705-2711.
[4] 蔡英丽, 马晓龙, 刘伟. 羊肚菌营养价值与保健功能综述[J]. 食药用菌,2021, 29(1):20-27.
[5] 兰进, 曹文芩, 徐锦堂. 中国羊肚菌属真菌资源[J]. 资源科学,1999 (2):58-63.
[6] 朱斗锡. 羊肚菌人工栽培成功[J]. 中国食用菌,1993(4):46.
[7] 易文林,李喜珍. 羊肚菌人工栽培方法[J]. 农业科技通讯,1994(9):18.
[8] 刘伟, 何培新, 时晓菲, 等. 我国羊肚菌栽培历程及相关基础研究进展[J]. 食药用菌,2022, 30(4): 261-270.
[9] 任亚丽. 羊肚菌工厂化栽培探索[J]. 南方农机,2024, 55(2):73-75,102.
[10] 谭方河. 阐释我国羊肚菌外营养袋栽培技术的发展历程[J]. 食药用菌,2019, 27(4):257-263.
[11] 程旭, 杨青, 余海忠, 等. 2022年襄阳市羊肚菌产业调研报告[J]. 湖北农业科学,2022, 61(S1):234-236,240.
[12] 刘福阳,王爱仙,巫仁高,等. 南方羊肚菌高产栽培技术研究[J]. 热带作物学报,2021, 42(11):3199-3205.
[13] OWER R.Notes on the development of the morel ascocarp: Morchella esculenta[J]. Mycologia, 2018, 74(1):142-144.
[14] 刘天海, 羊淑琴, 刘付彭, 等. 麦秸鸡粪发酵有机肥对六妹羊肚菌连作的影响[J]. 生物技术通报,2022, 38(12):263-273.
[15] TAN H, YU Y, TANG J, et al.Build your own mushroom soil: Microbiota succession and nutritional accumulation in semi synthetic substratum drive the fructification of a soil-saprotrophic morel[J]. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12:656656.
[16] 沈彤, 杜军, 李鸣雷, 等. 不同栽培基质对羊肚菌产量和营养成分的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2021, 41(3):187-192.
[17] 朱毅, 华秀爱. 沂蒙山区羊肚菌的资源状况与生境条件[J]. 中国食用菌,2006(1):11-13.
[18] 王永元, 李岩龙, 徐寅, 等. 土壤改良与搭建拱棚在羊肚菌人工栽培中的作用探索[J]. 食药用菌,2019, 27(5):328-330.
[19] 刘瑶琳. 六妹羊肚菌大田栽培优良菌株筛选及高产栽培研究[D]. 四川雅安:四川农业大学,2023.
[20] 郜惠苹, 田芳, 李宾, 等. 不同浓度草木灰对六妹羊肚菌菌丝生长及菌核形成的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯,2020(11):100-101,104.
[21] 沈新芬,夏洁明,沈渊. 双孢蘑菇不同覆土材料比较试验[J].食用菌,2014, 36(6):30-31.
[22] 朱金霞, 孔德杰, 冯锐, 等. 不同配方的外源营养袋对羊肚菌产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国食用菌,2023, 42(4):120-124,130.
[23] 米晓田,石磊,何刚,等. 陕西省小农户作物生产的减肥潜力及经济效益评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2021,54(20):4370-4384.