空间公正视角下新疆县域城乡融合发展质量多维评价

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.05.032

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于马克思空间正义理论,综合构建城乡融合发展质量多维评价体系,对新疆83个县域城乡政治、经济、社会、文化与生态的融合发展质量进行分析和测算,划分县域城乡融合发展类型,探索实现城乡经济社会空间公正自主融合的机制与路径。结果表明,研究区各地人口与公共服务资源空间配置基尼系数差异较大,县域公共服务资源人均占有率与基尼系数不完全吻合;公共交通空间可达性整体偏低,这与县域规模、等级、职能以及与中心城市的距离等因素有关;研究区县域城乡融合发展整体起步晚,水平低,程度浅,融合质量偏低,且因各县域发展基础、发展条件不同而呈现多元化发展趋势与特点;新疆83个县域城乡融合可划分为交通制约城乡融合发展型、公共服务制约城乡融合发展型、城乡融合全面良好型、城乡融合潜力优势型以及城乡融合全面滞后型5种类型;保障县域城乡要素自主流动与优化配置融合、推进城乡空间规划与功能融合、实施城乡产业互动融合、提升城乡公共服务全面均衡融合、重视城乡生态资源综合治理可持续融合,是实现城乡协调均衡与公平合理发展诉求的保障机制。

关键词: 空间公正, 城乡融合, 发展质量, 县域, 多维评价, 新疆

Abstract: Based on Marx’s theory of spatial justice, a multidimensional evaluation system for the quality of urban-rural integrated development was comprehensively constructed. The political, economic, social, cultural, and ecological integration development qualities across 83 counties in Xinjiang were analyzed and measured. The types of urban - rural integration were classified, and the realization mechanisms and pathways for achieving fair and autonomous socio - economic spatial integration between urban and rural areas were explored. The results showed that there were significant disparities in the Gini coefficients of population-public service resource allocation across the study area, and the per capita availability of public service resources did not fully align with the Gini coefficients.The overall spatial accessibility of public transportation remained relatively low, which was influenced by factors such as county size, administrative level, functional role, and distance from central cities. Generally, urban-rural integration in the study area started late, remained at a low level, and was shallow in development, with the overall integration quality being suboptimal. Due to varying developmental foundations and conditions, the counties demonstrated diverse trends and characteristics in their integration processes. The 83 counties in Xinjiang were categorized into five types of urban-rural integration: Transportation-constrained integration type, public service-constrained integration type, comprehensive well-integrated type, potential-advantaged integration type and comprehensive lagging integration type. The guarantee mechanisms for achieving coordinated, balanced, and equitable development between urban and rural areas included: Ensuring the free flow and optimal allocation of urban-rural production factors at the county level, promoting the integration of spatial planning and functions between urban and rural areas, implementing interactive industrial integration, enhancing comprehensive and balanced public service integration, and prioritizing sustainable ecological resource management.

Key words: spatial justice, urban-rural integration, development quality, county-level regions, multidimensional evaluation, Xinjiang

中图分类号:

F293
F299.27

吴文婕, 付雪, 陈俏, 阿也提古丽·斯迪克, 阿力木江·吐斯依提, 赵艳梅. 空间公正视角下新疆县域城乡融合发展质量多维评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(5): 207-214.

WU Wen-jie, FU Xue, CHEN Qiao, Ayetiguli Sidike, Alimujiang Tusiyiti, ZHAO Yan-mei. County-level multi-dimensional evaluation on the quality of urban-rural integration development in Xinjiang from the perspective of spatial justice[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2025, 64(5): 207-214.

参考文献

[1] 王立胜,朱鹏华.以县城为重要载体的城镇化建设的内涵、挑战与路径[J].中央财经大学学报,2023,43(6):3-11.
[2] 赵伟佚,潘玮,李裕瑞.县域内城乡融合发展:理论内涵与研究进展[J].地理研究,2023,42(6):1445-1464.
[3] 夏支平,战湘凝.优化县域治理全力推进乡村振兴[J].中国行政管理,2023,43(4):155-157.
[4] 姚石. 基于县域单元的浙江省城乡融合发展评价研究[D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2021.
[5] 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯全集[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[6] UNWIN T.Urban-rural interaction in developing countries: A theoretical perspective[A].POTTER R,UNWIN T. The geography of urban-rural interaction in developing countries[M].London,UK:Routledge,2017.
[7] GU H.Research on the development of rural social undertakings during the process of the integration of urban and rural areas[J].Scientific development,2012(10):6-10.
[8] MA L B,LIU S C,FANG F,et al.Evaluation of urban-rural difference and integration based on quality of life[J].Sustainable cities and society,2020,54:131-139.
[9] CASTLE E N,WU J J,WEBER B A.Place orientation and rural - urban interdependence[J].Applied economic perspectives and policy,2011,33(2):179-204.
[10] BOUDET F,MACDONALD G K,ROBINSON B E,et al.Rural-urban connectivity and agricultural land management across the Global South[J].Global environmental change,2020,60:101201-101211.
[11] TACOL I.The links between urban and rural development[J].Environment & urbanization,2003,15(1):3-12.
[12] 韩磊,王术坤,刘长全.中国农村发展进程及地区比较——基于2011—2017年中国农村发展指数的研究[J].中国农村经济,2019(7):2-20.
[13] 叶超,于洁.迈向城乡融合:新型城镇化与乡村振兴结合研究的关键与趋势[J].地理科学,2020,40(4):528-534.
[14] 贾秀飞. 重塑多维空间正义:中国城乡关系的演进实践与未来延展[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(4):16-27.
[15] 刘卫东. 马克思空间正义思想及其对当代城乡空间正义建构的启示[J].中北大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(1):83-89.
[16] 曹莉莉,林滨.马克思恩格斯空间正义理论视域下中国城乡融合问题研究[J].理论导刊,2020,42(8):48-54.
[17] 马光川,林聚任.空间视域下县域城乡融合发展与乡村振兴——以国家城乡融合发展试验区莱西市为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(1):42-49.
[18] 林妙萍. “流空间” 视域下广州市城乡融合水平评价与影响因素[D].广州:广州大学,2022.
[19] 周佳宁,毕雪昊,邹伟.“流空间” 视域下淮海经济区城乡融合发展驱动机制[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(8):1881-1896.
[20] 张凤超,张明.乡村振兴与城乡融合——马克思空间正义视阈下的思考[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018 (2):70-75,191-192.
[21] 薛亮,赵倩,龚超.基于集聚度和基尼系数的天津市公共卫生服务资源配置研究[J].中国公共卫生管理,2020,36(2):153-157.
[22] SOJA E W.Seeking spatial justice[M].Minneapolis,USA: University of Minnesota press,2010.
[23] 陈淇瑶,廖和平,刘愿理,等.重庆市县域交通可达性与多维贫困耦合关系研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2020, 42(4):12-24.
[24] 杨文静. 山东半岛城市群中心城市交通可达性对城乡融合水平的影响研究[D].山东烟台:烟台大学,2020.
[25] 苗毅,戴特奇,宋金平,等.交通优势度内涵扩展与方法改进及应用——以西藏自治区为例[J].地理学报,2023,78(6):1515-1529.
[26] 周群,肖鸣.湛茂阳城市带县域综合交通可达性研究[J].综合运输,2021,43(1):133-137.
[27] 周清香,何爱平.中国城乡融合发展的历史演进及其实现路径——马克思主义城乡关系理论的视角[J].西安财经大学学报,2022,35(2):29-38.
[28] 张扬金,邓观鹏.城乡空间融合的意蕴及其正义建构[J].浙江社会科学,2021(2):72-80.
[29] 刘守英,龙婷玉.城乡融合理论:阶段、特征与启示[J].经济学动态,2022(3):21-34.
[30] 文军,陈雪婧.城乡融合发展中的不确定性风险及其治理[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,40(3):18-33.
[31] 张永奇,单德朋.“流空间” 透视:数字经济赋能县域城乡融合的时空效应——基于2703个县域的经验证据[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,40(4):1-10.
[32] 杨爱君,宋李毅.县域城乡融合推进乡村生态振兴的路径研究[J].农业经济,2023,43(4):37-38.