Users satisfaction evaluation of urban slow moving system：Taking Nanming river slow moving system in Guiyang city as an example

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.01.037

Abstract

Abstract: Slow moving system is a kind of linear space type with special composite function in urban public space.From the perspective of user experience,the evaluation of slow moving system can supplement the theoretical research of slow moving system and provide basis for project practice.Taking Nanming river slow moving system of Guiyang city as the research object,this study investigated and obtained data from users,built a user satisfaction evaluation model with AHP,and used fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate.The results showed that the satisfaction of users to the slow moving system of Nanming river in Guiyang city reached the basic satisfaction level;The satisfaction of three project levels was that the environmental traffic was higher than the supporting facilities and higher than the recreational experience;In the index layer,18 evaluation indicators were divided into key improvement indicators,key maintenance indicators,maintenance improvement indicators and follow-up improvement indicators by using importance satisfaction analysis method,and put forward targeted improvement strategies and suggestions.

Key words: environmental planning, slow moving system, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, degree of satisfaction, Nanming river

CLC Number:

U491

HONG Hai-lin, WU Zhi-gang, GUO Wen-xia, QIU Hui. Users satisfaction evaluation of urban slow moving system：Taking Nanming river slow moving system in Guiyang city as an example[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 60(1): 178-183.

References

[1] 叶彭姚,陈小鸿.雷德朋体系的道路交通规划思想评述[J].国际城市规划,2009,24(4):69-73.
[2] LARSEN K.Research in progress:The Radburn idea as an emergent concept:Henry Wright's regional city[J].Planning perspectives,2008,23(3):381-395.
[3] 卡门·哈斯·克劳,陈祯耀.交通安宁:前联邦德国道路交通的新概念[J].国外城市规划,1993(1):32-36.
[4] 彼得·卡尔索普,杨保军,张泉.TOD在中国——面向低碳城市的土地使用与交通规划设计指南[J].江苏城市规划,2014(7):49.
[5] 上海市人民政府.上海市城市交通白皮书[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
[6] 李晔.《上海市慢行交通系统规划》解读[J].建设科技,2009(17):56-59.
[7] 熊文,陈小鸿,胡显标.城市慢行交通规划刍议[J].城市交通,2010,8(1):44-52,80.
[8] 云美萍,杨晓光,李盛.慢行交通系统规划简述[J].城市交通,2009,7(2):57-59.
[9] 万军,张航.基于低碳理念的城市慢行交通发展模式研究[J].西部交通科技,2010(7):75-79.
[10] 余伟,钱科烽,高奖,等.杭州市慢行交通系统规划与设计指引[J].城市交通,2009,7(2):44-56.
[11] HASS-KLAU C.The pedestrian and city traffic[M].London:Belhaven press,1990.
[12] 卢柯,潘海啸.城市步行交通的发展——英国、德国和美国城市步行环境的改善措施[J].国外城市规划,2001(6):39-43.
[13] 简·雅各布斯.美国大城市的死与生[M].金衡山,译.南京:译林出版社,2005.
[14] 克利夫·芒福汀.街道与广场(第2版)[M].张永刚,陈卫东,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
[15] 邵隽,李昭.慢城的可持续发展[J].城市发展研究,2015,22(1):66-71,78.
[16] 朱晓清,甄峰,蒋跃庭.国外慢城发展情况及对中国城市发展的启示[J].城市发展研究,2011,18(4):84-90.
[17] 李萍,周彬,CHRIS RYAN,等.基于模糊综合评价的徒步休闲满意度研究——以浙江省宁波市为例[J].旅游学刊,2018,33(5):44-55.
[18] 许晓玲,朱志鹏,陈梓茹,等.城市森林步道游客综合评价——以福道为例[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(4):109-115.
[19] 齐闫夙,周春波.徐州市主城区慢行交通研究[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,42(9):139-143.
[20] 卢飞红,尹海伟,孔繁花.城市绿道的使用特征与满意度研究——以南京环紫金山绿道为例[J].中国园林,2015,31(9):50-54.
[21] 邢权兴,孙虎,管滨,等.基于模糊综合评价法的西安市免费公园游客满意度评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1645-1651.
[22] 孙化蓉,王浩.基于模糊综合评价的绿道骑行者满意度调查——以句容绿道为例[J].福建林业科技,2016,43(4):195-201.
[23] 马光艳,朱洪革.城市绿化工程质量的模糊综合评价[J].中国园林,2004(4):68-70.
[24] 高长波,陈新庚,韦朝海,等.熵权模糊综合评价法在城市生态安全评价中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2006(10):1923-1927.
[25] 刘德晶,邓立斌,陈端吕,等.模糊综合评价法在九万山自然保护区综合评价中的应用[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(7):7-11.
[26] 廉同辉,余菜花,包先建,等.基于模糊综合评价的主题公园游客满意度研究——以芜湖方特欢乐世界为例[J].资源科学,2012,34(5):973-980.