Quality evaluation and regional difference analysis of new urbanization in the core area of Huaihai economic zone

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.05.039

Abstract

Abstract: According to the development characteristics and actual situation of new urbanization in the core area of Huaihai economic zone, the comprehensive evaluation index system for the quality of new urbanization was established from three aspects of urbanization development, urban-rural overall planning, and resources and environment. The entropy method, difference coefficient and GIS spatial analysis method were used to reveal the temporal and spatial evolution process of new urbanization quality level in the core area of Huaihai economic zone from 2010 to 2018. The results showed that the quality of new urbanization in the core area of Huaihai economic zone was on the rise as a whole, and the quality difference within the region was obvious. The urbanization quality level of Xuzhou City had always maintained a leading position and belonged to the high quality with medium speed development mode; Jining City, Zaozhuang City, Lianyungang City and Suqian City had medium quality level of urbanization, and the development modes were medium quality with low speed, medium quality with medium speed, medium quality with medium speed and medium quality with low speed, respectively; Shangqiu City, Huaibei City and Suzhou City had relatively low urbanization quality level, and their development modes were low quality with low speed, low quality with high speed and low quality with low speed, respectively.

Key words: new urbanization, core area of Huaihai economic zone, entropy method, regional temporal and spatial differences

CLC Number:

F299.27

LIU Xin-ran, XI Yan-tao. Quality evaluation and regional difference analysis of new urbanization in the core area of Huaihai economic zone[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2023, 62(5): 227-232.

References

[1] 王新越,秦素贞,吴宁宁.新型城镇化的内涵、测度及其区域差异研究[J].地域研究与开发,2014,33(4):69-75.
[2] 徐莉. 新型城镇化发展水平评价及其空间特征分析——以江苏省常州市为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):61-66.
[3] 陆大道,陈明星.关于“国家新型城镇化规划(2014—2020)”编制大背景的几点认识[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):179-185.
[4] 蓝庆新,刘昭洁,彭一然.中国新型城镇化质量评价指标体系构建及评价方法——基于2003—2014年31个省市的空间差异研究[J].南方经济,2017(1):111-126.
[5] 李玉光,肖潇.基于改进熵值法的唐山市新型城镇化质量评价体系的构建[J].价值工程,2020,39(20):74-76.
[6] 奚萍子. 安徽省新型城镇化质量评价体系研究[J].现代商贸工业,2020,41(28):13-14.
[7] 崔木花. 中原城市群9市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):72-78.
[8] 朱文龙,张欣雨,孙乾翔.淮海经济区城镇化与生态环境耦合协调发展分析[J].中外建筑,2020(8):127-130.
[9] 欧向军,甄峰,叶磊,等.江苏省城市化质量的区域差异时空分析[J].人文地理,2012,27(5):76-82.
[10] 杨洋,黄聪,何春阳,等.山东半岛城市群新型城镇化综合水平的时空变化[J].经济地理,2017,37(8):77-85.
[11] 王怡睿,黄煌,石培基.中国城镇化质量时空演变研究[J].经济地理,2017,37(1):90-97.
[12] 刘继为,陈会然,谢中起,等.基于熵值法的河北省地级市城镇化质量评价研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2020,50(2):73-81.
[13] 张蕊,邱亮亮.基于TOPSIS模型的天津市城镇化质量评价研究[J].绿色科技,2020(14):246-250.
[14] 祖丽皮努尔·依马木.新疆城市化发展质量的综合测度与区域差异分析[J].市场周刊,2020(3):58-61.
[15] 贾兴梅,李俊,贾伟.安徽省新型城镇化协调水平测度与比较[J].经济地理,2016,36(2):80-86.
[16] 杨坤矗,毕润成,孙然好,等.京津冀地区城市化发展时空差异特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(12):3998-4007.
[17] 马奔,薛阳.京津冀城市群城镇化质量评价研究[J].宏观经济研究,2019(4):73-83,170.
[18] 张祥. 成渝城市群城镇化质量与协调性研究[D].四川绵阳:西南科技大学,2020.
[19] 李景,何建华.新型城镇化视角下武汉城市圈城镇化质量研究[J].特区经济,2020(3):39-43.
[20] 周蓓蓓,欧向军,李自鹏,等.淮海经济区高质量发展系统耦合协调分析[J].资源开发与市场,2020,36(11):1239-1245.
[21] 臧宏宽,薛文博,徐毅,等.淮海经济区核心区污染排放对重点区域城市PM_2.5贡献研究[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(9):3112-3119.
[22] 韩世静. 淮海经济区发展的政治战略研究[D].江苏徐州:中国矿业大学,2019.
[23] 廖中举,张志英.省际新型城镇化发展水平测度与比较[J].统计与决策,2020,36(20):168-171.
[24] 李燕娜. 湖南省新型城镇化质量指标体系构建及评价研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(2):172-177.
[25] 甘海侠. 中国城镇化质量的评价研究[D].西安:西北大学,2017.
[26] 刘秋艳,吴新年.多要素评价中指标权重的确定方法评述[J].知识管理论坛,2017,2(6):500-510.
[27] 刘超,黄克红,陆媛媛,等.贵州省城市化发展质量测度及区域差异分析[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(1):61-66.