Abstract: Based on the panel data of 33 pilot areas of the national homestead reform, the annual per capita disposable income of farmers was used as the explanatory variable, the DID model was used to compare the impact of the “three rights separation” reform of homestead on rural revitalization, and the results were tested for robustness and analyzed for heterogeneity. The results showed that the reform of the “three rights separation” of homestead had a positive effect on promoting rural revitalization, but due to the difference in regional economic level and the lag in policy implementation, the promotion effect in some areas was not significant.

Key words: homestead reform, rural revitalization, “three rights separation”, differences-in-differences