Farmers' adoption behavior and influencing factors of saline-alkali cultivated land treatment technologies: A case study of Awati County, Xinjiang

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2025.06.038

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the micro-research data from 245 rural households in Awati County, Xinjiang, the adoption behavior, adoption intensity and influencing factors of salinized cultivated land treatment technologies by rural households were systematically explored through theoretical and empirical analyses. The results showed that regarding whether farmers adopted salinized cultivated land treatment technologies, the total area of cultivated land, cultivated land quality protection subsidies, and salinization treatment training all had a significant positive impact on farmers' adoption decision. Regarding farmers' adoption intensity of salinized cultivated land treatment technologies, household characteristics (number of agricultural laborers), cultivated land characteristics (total cultivated land area), external environmental characteristics (impact of sand - dust weather, rationality of agricultural product prices), and policy-oriented characteristics (cultivated land quality protection subsidies, salinization treatment training) all significantly influenced the adoption intensity. The heterogeneity analysis indicated that individual farmer characteristics (education level), household characteristics (number of agricultural laborers), cultivated land characteristics (total cultivated land area), and policy-oriented characteristics (cultivated land quality protection subsidies, salinization treatment training) had differential impacts on farmers' adoption of physical improvement technology, chemical improvement technology, hydraulic improvement technology, and biological improvement technology. Based on the above-mentioned analyses, policy suggestions such as constructing a systematic promotion system for salinized cultivated land treatment technologies and implementing a diversified technology collaborative treatment model were put forward.

Key words: farmers, salinized cultivated land treatment technologies, adoption behavior, influencing factors, Awati County, Xinjiang

CLC Number:

TU Jiao-yang, Abudureheman Abudikeranmu, GUO Yong-chao, MA Yu-qin, ZHANG Qing, WANG Jin-yi. Farmers' adoption behavior and influencing factors of saline-alkali cultivated land treatment technologies: A case study of Awati County, Xinjiang[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2025, 64(6): 240-246.

References

[1] 王晓兵. 推动农业机械化智能化,强化粮食安全装备支撑[J].农业经济与管理,2023(1):21-23.
[2] 刘伟,陈彦斌.以高质量发展实现中国式现代化目标[J].中国高校社会科学,2022(6):33-40,155.
[3] 朱生堡,乌尔古丽·托尔逊,唐光木,等.新疆盐碱地变化及其治理措施研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2023,55(3):158-165.
[4] 李瑞云,鲁纯养,凌礼章.植物耐盐性研究现状与展望[J].盐碱地利用,1989,19(1):38-41.
[5] 王健,李傲瑞.我国盐碱地改良技术综述[J].现代农业科技,2019(21):182-183,185.
[6] 邵丹丹,艾海舰.浅谈定边县盐碱地形成原因及改良技术[J].榆林学院学报,2023,33(2):47-51.
[7] 白建铎,彭杰,史舟,等.基于多源数据的干旱区盐渍化农田精准管理分区研究[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(2):646-655.
[8] 马奔,黄贤金,陈志刚,等.区域盐碱地改良技术的农户选择意愿及影响因素——基于江苏省滨海盐碱区133户农户的调查[J].中国农业大学学报,2013,18(2):202-210.
[9] D'SOUZA G,CYPHERS D,PHIPPS T. Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices[J]. Agricultural and resource economics review,1993,22(2):159-165.
[10] 朱红根,翁贞林,康兰媛.农户参与农田水利建设意愿影响因素的理论与实证分析——基于江西省619户种粮大户的微观调查数据[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(4):539-546.
[11] 杨志海,王雨濛.不同代际农民耕地质量保护行为研究——基于鄂豫两省829户农户的调研[J].农业技术经济,2015(10):48-56.
[12] 谢婉菲. 农户参与耕地保护程度评价及影响因素分析——以四川省彭州市为例[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2012.
[13] ARELLANES P,LEE D R.The determinants of adoption of sustainable agriculture technologies: Evidence from the hill sides of Honduras[A].Proceedings of the 25th international conference of agricultural economists[C].Durban,South Africa: Event dynamics,2003.693-699.
[14] 王景立,韩楠楠,冯伟志,等.东北苏打盐碱地整治工程技术与装备研究综述[J].农业与技术,2018,38(23):1-4.
[15] ADNAN N, MD NORDIN S, RAHMAN I, et al.Adoption of green fertilizer technology among paddy farmers: A possible solution for Malaysian food security[J].Land use policy,2017,63:38-52.
[16] 高明秀,薛敏,王洪莹.环渤海盐碱地可持续利用路径决择与政策建议[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(S2):228-231.
[17] ECHEVERRIA J,PIDOT J.Drawing the line: Striking a principled balance between regulating and paying to protect the land[J].Envtl L Rep News & Analysis,2009,39:10868.