Study on Constructional Land Transition in Rural Area——Yichang City as an Example

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2018.09.033

Abstract

Abstract: Through the analysis of the transfer potential of rural collective construction land in Yichang city, it can not only provide a scientific and reasonable index system for the calculation of the transfer potential, but also provide assistance for the development of the circulation and the formulation of relevant policies, and plays a key role in the development and construction of urban and rural areas in Yichang city. A revised model of rural collective construction land transfer potential to correct the consolidation potential of rural residential areas in Yichang city was constructed, and obtains the scale of rural collective construction land transfer potential in counties and cities in Yichang city and explores the order of its circulation. The results show that, the urban areas have the scale of 85.660 6 km² for the transition and it is the highest potential in Yichang. In addition, the potential of Wufeng County is the least in Yichang and its scale is 0.132 8 km². In the aspect of the order,Yuanan County and Zhijiang have the same scale of transition,while Zhijiang is more suitable than Yuanan County. Through the analysis of the finding,the potential of transition among counties and cities in Yichang varies significantly. Combined with the incongruity between the rank and the order of transition potential,it reveals that the socioeconomic development in some counties and cities stands in the way for the realization of transition. To overcome the dilemma,government in Yichang is supposed to coordinate the relations of various fields,expedite economic and social development and to release the potential of rural collective construction land transition,so as to mobilize transition with the development of society and economy and vice versa.

Key words: Yichang city, rural constructional land, potential of transition, rural residential areas, levels

CLC Number:

F323

WU Wen-jun, WANG Dong-yan, YIN Xiao-chen. Study on Constructional Land Transition in Rural Area——Yichang City as an Example[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2018, 57(9): 137-144.

References

[1] 饶永辉. 农村集体建设用地流转问题研究——以宁波市鄞州区姜山镇为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2013.
[2] 刘建生. 农村居民点整治之模式识别、潜力测算与布局优化研究——以浙江省吴兴区为例[D].南京:南京农业大学,2013.
[3] 晏坤,艾南山.当前我国农村集体建设用地流转存在的问题及对策[J].国土经济,2003(7):33-35.
[4] 郭玲霞. 对放开农村集体建设用地流转的若干思考[J].天津农业科学,2016,22(2):100-102,139.
[5] 李宪文,张军连,郑伟元,等.中国城镇化过程中村庄土地整理潜力估算[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(4):276-279.
[6] 陈荣清,张凤荣,孟媛,等.农村居民点整理的现实潜力估算[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(4):216-221.
[7] 刘筱非,杨庆媛,廖和平,等.西南丘陵山区农村居民点整理潜力测算方法探讨——以重庆市渝北区为例[J].西南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,2(4):1-4.
[8] 施开放,刁承泰.重庆市永川区农村集体建设用地流转现实潜力估算[J].热带地理,2012,32(3):269-273.
[9] 鲁春阳,文枫,杨庆媛,等.农村集体建设用地流转潜力估算[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(5):305-312.
[10] 张英男,王冬艳,祝元丽,等.县域农村集体建设用地入市流转潜力研究——以吉林省安图县为例[J].安徽农业科学,2015, 43(16):307-310.
[11] 刘名冲,张祥义,马鹰,等.基于熵权可拓模型的农村居民点整理潜力研究——以河北省太行山山前平原区为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(9):1166-1172.
[12] 游黎,周就猫,邓京虎,等.基于物元可拓法的土地整治项目综合评价——以江西省樟树市光明村项目为例[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(32):20167-20169.
[13] 刘小波,彭春艳,魏丽,等.重庆市荣昌县集体建设用地流转驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):182-191.
[14] 石诗源,张小林.江苏省农村居民点用地现状分析与整理潜力测算[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(9):52-58.
[15] 马锐,韩武波,吕春娟,等.城乡交错带居民点整理潜力研究——以山西省太原市晋源区为例[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(21):192-194.
[16] 刘朋辉. 农村集体建设用地利用现状评价及整理潜力测算——以陕西省合阳县为例[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015.
[17] 江恩赐,集体建设用地流转价格评估研究——以吉林省四平市为例[D].吉林四平:吉林师范大学,2013.
[18] 陈伟珂,龙昭琴.基于熵权和可拓理论在评标中的应用[J].石家庄铁道大学学报(社会科学版),2011,5(3):5-11.